Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Ten Questions to a missionary

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hare Krishna Ashutosh,

 

> To your point 6) It is to emphasize that god made man with his

inherited sin, according to Christianity we are all sinners.

 

God didn't make man sinful, it was and always is a question of free

will.

 

> One point I find also good is: Christianity teaches, that God send

his son to save the humanity. Only doe to the sacrifice of his own

son, Jesus, i.e. Accepting him as the only savior it is possible to

get into heaven. A) What did happen with all the billions of people in

the billions of years before Christ came after they died?

 

It can be understood when we accept that the same person known as

Jesus appeared many times before and was worshiped as Sankarshana in

Vedic context, as Baal-Serapis in Egypt, as Asclepius-Dionysos in

Greece, as Toba-Yahu in Israel, as Amitayus-Lokeshvara in Pure Land

Buddhism, etc. (as per Bhakti Ananda Maharaja's research). "Only

savior" means that He is the one who initiates into the spiritual

process, the Adi-guru. After all, Krishna says in the Gita that He

comes over and over again whenever dharma is declining.

 

> B) A few years ago Pope John-Paul the 2nd decided that non

Christians who never heard of the message of Christ, if they heard

about it and did not get converted, then too bad they had it, but the

others who did not hear about and lived a proper sinless live also can

get into heaven.

 

Obviously one who doesn't accept the mercy remains "on his own",

paying for one's karma.

 

> In short, the whole theology of Christianity is absurd. Look at it

from a non brain washed distance, with an objective mind it can

compete with the best comics books. Jesus is probably the most

misinterpreted, misunderstood person ever walking the earth, and his

teaching misused for power and tyranny for 2000 years.

 

This discussion refers to misinterpretation and misbehavior of one

group as if that one could reject its teachings this way. This kind of

shallow argumentation is always used by secularists against theists.

They want to divide and conquer that way. Why not to get to the

essence?

 

I always prefer to learn how to reconcile differences than to condemn

and ridicule the unknown. I recommend you to do the same if you can.

 

Your servant, Jan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...