Guest guest Posted March 20, 2003 Report Share Posted March 20, 2003 Namaskar Mitra, Did yu know that - 1. the Janata Party Government when in power 1977-79 had introduced a Constitutional Amendment defining the word Secularism but by virtue of its majority in the Rajya Sabha the Congress vetoed this proposed amendment. 2. In the Ayodhya Acquisition Case AIR 1995, Justice Ahmadi & Bharucha said giving a judgment in favor of the Hindus on whether a temple there would amount to being an unsecular decision. READ BELOW. · An attempt was made to define the word Secularism vide constitutional amendment 44. Quote from page 929 of Indian Constitutional Law by M P Jain “CA42 had introduced into the preamble of the Constitution the terms ‘secular’ & ‘socialist’ without however defining or explaining the significance of these terms. CB45 sought to define these terms. ‘Secular Republic’ was defined to mean a ‘republic’ in which there is equal respect for all religions. This definition clause did not appear in CA44. The reason for this: the Janata Government had a large majority in the Lok Sabha but it was in a minority in the Rajya Sabha. While the Lok Sabha passed CB45 as a whole, a few clauses had to be omitted there from in the Rajya Sabha which were voted down by the Congress Party”. Simply put the Congress did not agree to the definition of Secularism being part of the Indian Constitution. Pg 657 para 152 quote Justice Ahmadi & Bharucha, “The Act and the Reference, as stated hereinabove, favor one religious community and disfavor another, the purpose of the Reference is, therefore opposed to secularism & is unconstitutional. Besides, the Reference does not serve a constitutional purpose”. This is the perverse view of these two learned Judges that they would not answer the Presidential Reference on the existence or otherwise of a Hindu temple at the Babri structure because their decision favoring one religious community & disfavoring another would not be secular. In simple words meaning if they gave a judgment in favor of the Hindus it would not be a secular but communal decision. cheers & om sanjeev Discover your Indian Roots at - http://www.esamskriti.comTo mail - exploreindia (AT) vsnl (DOT) net, to Un write back.Long Live Sanatan / Kshatriya Dharam. Become an Intellectual KshatriyaGenerate Positive Vibrations lifelong worldwide.Aap ka din mangalmaya rahe or Shubh dinam astu or Have a Nice DayUnity preceedes Strength Synchronize your efforts, avoid duplication.THINK, ACT, INFLUENCE, to Un write back.Create Positive Karmas by being Focussed, controlling senses, will power & determinationNever boasts about yr victory and successKnowledge, Wealth, Happiness are meant to be sharedBe Open Minded, pick up what yu like from the world Stop cribbing, ACTION is what the Indian scriptures talk aboutTake the battle into the enemy camp, SET THE AGENDA, be proactiveIn an argument, no emotions, be detached, get yr facts right, then attack with the precision of a missile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.