Guest guest Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 Country Analysis: India 05-03-03 The Republic of India (India), the world's sixth largest energy consumer, plans major energy infrastructure investments to keep up with increasing demand -- particularly for electric power. India also is the world's third-largest producer of coal, and relies on coal for more than half of its total energy needs. Information contained in this report is the best available as of March 2003 and can change. India's economic growth is currently recovering from a mild slowdown in 2002, which was mainly attributable to weak demand for manufactured exports and the effects of a drought on agricultural output. Real growth in the country's gross domestic product (GDP) was 4.8 % for 2002, and is projected to rise to 5.7 % in 2003. (The Indian fiscal year for economic statistics begins on April 1.) The economic effects of recent political tensions in the region have been quite modest. After many years of pursuing economic policies based on import substitution and state ownership of key industries, India's government embarked on a series of economic reforms in the mid-1990s. Included in the reforms have been a relaxation of restrictions on foreign ownership in some sectors, and the privatisation of some industrial enterprises. After much delay, the Indian government decided in January 2003 to move forward with the sale of majority stakes in two downstream oil companies, which has been seen as a major development. India has a longstanding territorial dispute with Pakistan over the ownership of Kashmir, which has led to a tense relationship between the two countries since the partition of British India in 1947. After a large-scale mobilization of military forces along their border during most of 2002, tensions eased somewhat late in the year, and both sides have pulled back some of their forces from the border. India's rivalry with Pakistan has direct relevance to the country's energy sector, as it impedes plans for regional natural gas and/or oil pipelines (i.e., from Central Asia). India has implemented a series of policy changes since the mid-1990s to encourage foreign investment. Tariffs on imported capital goods have been lowered, and in some cases eliminated (such as equipment for large scale power generation projects). Restrictions on foreign ownership have been relaxed. Previously, foreign ownership usually had been limited to a minority ownership stake. Now, in many sectors, majority foreign ownership is permitted. In some areas, however, reform has been slow -- particularly the energy sector. Electricity consumption is still supported by heavy subsidies, and the formal end of the Administered Pricing Mechanism (APM) for petroleum products in April 2002 did not completely end government controls on petroleum product prices. Annual foreign direct investment (FDI) in India has hovered in the range of $ 3-4 bn over the last several years, though, compared to roughly $ 40 bn per year of FDI in China. Oil Oil accounts for about 30 % of India's total energy consumption. The majority of India's roughly 5.4 bn barrels in oil reserves are located in the Bombay High, Upper Assam, Cambay, Krishna-Godavari, and Cauvery basins. The offshore Bombay High field is by far India's largest producing field, with production of 203,000 bpd in 2001. India's average oil production level (total liquids) for 2002 was 759,000 bpd. India had net oil imports of over 1.2 mm bpd in 2002. Future oil consumption in India is expected to grow rapidly, to 3.2 mm bpd by 2010, from 2.0 mm bpd in 2002. India is attempting to limit its dependence on oil imports somewhat by expanding domestic exploration and production. To this end, the Indian government is pursuing the NELP, first announced in 1997, which permits foreign involvement in exploration, an activity long restricted to Indian state-owned firms. While the initial response to the 1999 tender was disappointing, with no bids received from the major multinational oil companies (causing an extension of the deadline for submission of bids), India proceeded with the award of 25 oil exploration blocks in early January 2000. The largest winner in the bidding round was India's domestic Reliance Industries, in partnership with independent Niko Resources of Canada, which received 12 blocks. British independent Cairn Energy, Russia's Gazprom, the US firm Mosbacher Energy, and Geopetrol of France were all awarded single blocks in partnership with Indian firms. India's state-owned ONGC was awarded eight blocks, three of which it will hold in partnership with other public-sector Indian firms. A second round of bidding, with a total of 25 blocks offered, concluded in March 2001. Sixteen of the blocks have been awarded to ONGC, and four blocks to Hardy Oil of the United Kingdom, in partnership with India's Reliance Petroleum. The others were either awarded to smaller independent firms or failed to receive bids. As with the first round, no bids were received from major international oil companies. Bids for the third round were received in August 2002, with a total of 27 blocks offered. Awards under this third round were made in February 2003, with domestic Indian firms receiving most of the blocks. Reliance Industries received nine offshore blocks, one adjacent to the Krishna- Godavari Basin. ONGC was awarded 13 blocks, five offshore and eight onshore. The Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation received one. Low drilling recovery rates are a major part of the oil supply problem for India. Recovery rates average only around 30 % in currently producing Indian fields, well below the world average. It is hoped that allowing foreign investment will bring in technology that is not available to Indian state firms, thereby increasing overall recovery rates. ONGC currently is undertaking a project to increase recovery rates in the Bombay High offshore field and several others as well, aiming to boost the overall recovery rate for its production assets from 28 % to 40 %. Recent experience does not support an optimistic view about India's prospects for s sharp increase in oil production as no major new finds have been made in recent years. Analysts consider it likely that most of India's easily recoverable oil has been discovered. The main cause for hope is offshore exploration, and in particular deep water exploration. One onshore area which also has shown promise is western Rajasthan, and a small find was reported in early 2001 by Cairn Energy offshore from Gujarat which is believed to hold about 200 mm barrels of recoverable reserves. Most recent drilling, however, has found natural gas rather than crude oil. BG purchased a 30 % stake in the Panna, Mukta, and Tapti offshore oil and gas fields in February 2002, which had previously been held by Enron. A dispute between BG and ONGC, which owns a 40 % interest in the fields, over which firm would operate them was resolved in February 2003 with a "joint operatorship agreement." Reliance Industries holds the other 30 % stake. Downstream/refining For most of the 1990s, India imported a large quantity of refined products, lacking the refining capacity to keep up with growing demand. In 1999, refinery construction allowed India to close the gap. At the end of 2002, India had a total of 2.1 mm bpd in refining capacity, an increase of 970,000 bpd since 1998. In late summer 1999, Reliance Petroleum's huge Jamnagar refinery came onstream. It has since reached its full capacity of 540,000 bpd. Jamnagar does not have its own retail distribution network, but sells its product through three of the state-owned firms. It plans to build a retail network of its own in coming years. Refinery construction has been encouraged by regulatory changes by the Indian government, including a five-year tax holiday for refineries completed by 2003. Another major downstream infrastructure development is the construction of pipelines being undertaken by Petronet India, a company created by an agreement in 1998 between India's state-owned refineries, which will add 500,000 bpd to India's current 325,000 bpd capacity for pipeline transportation of refined products. Pipelines between refineries and major urban centres are replacing rail as the main mode of transportation. While retail gasoline sales are still controlled by state firms, several multinationals have entered the Indian lubricants market, which was deregulated five years ago. Over one-third of the market is currently held by such firms as Shell, ExxonMobil, and Caltex. While these operations are relatively small, they are seen as allowing the majors to study the Indian market, establish brand recognition, and prepare for the eventual deregulation of the Indian retail petroleum products sector. Still, a requirement that foreign firms invest at least $ 400 mm before entering the downstream market has served to limit their entry into petroleum products retailing. Industry restructuring and price deregulation The Indian government officially ended the Administered Pricing Mechanism (APM) for petroleum product prices in April 2002. Prior to this deregulation, the Indian government had tried to offset the effects of price changes in crude oil by maintaining an Oil Pool Account, which was to build financial reserves when crude oil prices fell and release them back as increased subsidies when crude oil prices rose. In practice, though, the April 2002 reforms have not completely removed government influence on petroleum product prices. Subsidies have been maintained on some products, such as kerosene, which is commonly used as a cooking fuel by low-income households in India. State-owned downstream companies also still must submit proposed price changes to the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas for approval. There have been some indications that this approval process has been used in late 2002 and early 2003 to curb increases in petroleum product prices as crude oil prices have risen. After an extended delay due to internal policy debates, the Indian government announced a decision in December 2002 to sell off majority stakes in two of the largest state-owned downstream oil companies, Hindustan Petroleum (HPCL) and Bharat Petroleum (BPCL). HPCL is slated to be sold off to a "strategic" buyer -- another major oil company. BPCL's shares will be offered through a public stock offering. The Indian federal government currently owns 51 % of HPCL and 66 % of BPCL. The divestments are planned for the second half of 2003. Natural gas Indian consumption of natural gas has risen faster than any other fuel in recent years. From only 0.6 tcf per year in 1995, natural gas use was nearly 0.8 tcf in 2000 and is projected to reach 1.2 tcf in 2005 and 1.6 tcf in 2010. A major development in December 2002 was the announcement by Reliance Industries of its discovery of a large amount of natural gas in the Krishna-Godavari Basin offshore from Andhra Pradesh along India's southeast coast. New reserves from this find are estimated at about 5 tcf. Cairn Energy also reported finds in late 2002 offshore from Andhra Pradesh as well as Gujarat, which contain reserves estimated at nearly 2 tcf. Even with these new reserves, India's domestic natural gas supply is not likely to keep pace with demand, and the country will have to import much of its natural gas, either via pipeline or as LNG. The main market impacts from the new finds will be on India's east coast, which currently lacks extensive natural gas infrastructure. While EIA's current forecast in the International Energy Outlook 2002 predicts a 6.1 % annual growth rate in natural gas consumption, this reflects a substantial downward revision from previous forecasts, which had projected consumption of 2.7 tcf per year by 2010. Problems with financing LNG import projects have dimmed some of the previous prospects for explosive growth in natural gas consumption in India, and helped to revive interest in pipeline import options. Financial problems in the power sector, the main consumer of natural gas, also have had a negative effect. Most of India's current natural gas production takes place in the Bombay High basin and the state of Gujarat. Current projects include enhancing natural gas production at the Tapti fields and recovering previously flared natural gas at the Bombay High oilfield. India is investing heavily in the infrastructure required to support increased use of natural gas. Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL), a government-owned entity, is in the process of doubling the throughput capacity on its main Hazira-Bijaipur-Jagdishpur (HBJ) Pipeline. Work on the capacity expansion began in 2002, and will eventually raise the capacity of the line from about 1.1 bn cfpd to 2.1 bn cfpd. GAIL also plans a new distribution network in West Bengal and a pipeline which would connect Calcutta with Chennai. Shell has signed a memorandum of understanding with the state government of Uttar Pradesh in northern India for the development of a natural gas distribution infrastructure. India's FIPB had approved 12 prospective LNG import terminal projects in the mid-to-late-1990s, but it was never considered likelythat all would be built in the near future, as their combined capacity would have exceeded even the most optimistic demand projections. The Indian government froze approvals of new LNG terminals in 2001, and the payment problems at the Enron-backed Dabhol Power Plant in Maharashtra have led many to question the financial viability of some of the LNG import projects. Since the main consumers of the imported gas would be power producers, the poor financial condition of most of the state power boards which purchase power and run the transmission grids is likely to be a major constraint on the development of LNG imports. The largest state sector projects are to be conducted by Petronet, a joint venture between ONGC, IOC, the Gas Authority of India Ltd. (GAIL), the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), and Gaz de France. Under the current plan, each of the state firms would own a 10 % stake, the Gujarat state government will own a 5 % stake, and the rest will be offered to private investors, possibly including an equity stake for Qatar's RasGas, the main supplier of LNG for the project. Petronet plans two import terminals, one at Dahej and the other at Cochin. The import terminal at Dahej currently is under construction, and is expected to be completed in late 2003. RasGas is to begin supplying LNG to Petronet when the Dahej terminal is completed. The Dahej terminal has had advantages over some of the other proposed projects, being tied in with the main state-owned natural gas company, GAIL, and the existing HBJ pipeline network. It is unclear whether sufficient demand will exist to support a planned 2007 completion date for the Cochin import terminal. Shell also has begun construction of its LNG import terminal at Hazira in Gujarat, and has contracted for LNG supplies from Oman. The facility is scheduled to begin operation in 2005. Like the Petronet Dahej terminal, it is to be signed into existing natural gas pipelines. The Dabhol LNG terminal was nearly finished at the time construction was halted in June 2001, and it will likely be completed by another firm once a buyer is found for the now-bankrupt Enron's 65 % share of the project. Two other American firms involved in the project, General Electric and Bechtel, which each now own 10 %, are reported to be in the final stages of negotiations to acquire the stake formerly held by Enron. In the wake of the problems with Dabhol, firms backing several other LNG projects pulled out in the second half of 2001. Dhaksin Bharat Energy, a consortium including CMS Energy and Unocal, also announced the cancellation of its planned LNG project at Ennore. TotalFinaElf has suspended further action on its planned LNG import terminal at Trombay. These LNG projects were cancelled largely in response to the Indian government's decision not to extend sovereign payment guarantees to power projects which were to have been among their largest customers. Another proposed project at Kakinada on India's east coast may be jeopardized by cheaper natural gas supplies which will become available once Reliance Industries offshore new offshore finds are developed. Aside from LNG imports, imports of natural gas by pipeline may play a role eventually in satisfying India's gas needs. One possibility would supply India with natural gas from Iran's huge South Pars field via a pipeline, either subsea or through Pakistan. Iran has discussed the proposal with India and Pakistan. Australia's Broken Hill Proprietary (BHP) is the main foreign backer of the idea. An offshore route bypassing Pakistan is under study by Snamprogetti of Italy. Pakistan had said in early 2001 that it would allow supplies to cross its territory, and Iran would bear the contractual responsibility for assuring gas supplies to India, but the project does not appear likely to be implemented in the near future due to the obvious security concerns for India. Another possible import route would link the natural gas reserves of Bangladesh into the Indian gas grid. Current proven reserves of natural gas in Bangladesh are at least 14 tcf, but the foreign firms involved in natural gas exploration in Bangladesh, which includes Unocal, believe that reserves are higher. Shell, which backs exports to India, has estimated Bangladeshi natural gas reserves at 38 tcf, and a study by the US Geological Survey put the country's probable reserves at 32 tcf. Bangladesh has been reluctant to approve exports to India, however, until all questions about reserves and its domestic supply have been resolved. Shell reportedly has been in negotiations with Unocal about possible imports of Bangladeshi gas for its distribution projects in Uttar Pradesh, and Unocal made a formal proposal to the Bangladeshi government for gas exports in October 2001. As of February 2003, the Bangladeshi government is still considering the idea, and has not reached a final decision. The new natural gas reserves discovered off Andhra Pradesh in 2002 could compete with imports from Bangladesh, thus increasing the pressure to reach a decision in the near future. India's government has been considering reforms in its natural gas pricing mechanism, which is currently set by the government. Deregulation has been delayed several times, and the recent increase in domestic reserves may lead to a tilt toward less regulation of prices, making LNG importers compete with domestic natural gas suppliers. Coal Coal is the dominant commercial fuel in India, satisfying more than half of India's energy demand. Power generation accounts for about 70 % of India's coal consumption, followed by heavy industry. Coal consumption is projected in the International Energy Annual 2002 to increase to 450 mm short tons in 2010, up from 369 mm short tons in 2000. This is a substantial increase in the rate of growth projected in previous forecasts. India is the world's third largest coal producer (after China and the United States), so most of the country's coal demand is satisfied by domestic supplies. Indian coal generally has a high ash content and low calorific value, so most coking coal must be imported. Major Indian coal fields are found in Bihar, West Bengal, and Madhya Pradesh. The Indian government controls almost all coal production, which has been plagued by low productivity, distribution problems, and loss of markets to higher quality, less expensive imports. Nearly all of India's 390 mines are under Coal India Ltd. (CIL), which accounts for about 90 % of the country's coal production. Current policy allows private mines only if they are "captive" operations which feed a power plant or factory. The current government has called off plans for further coal-sector liberalization in the face of strong opposition from labour unions. Electricity India is trying to expand electric power generation capacity, as current generation is seriously below peak demand. Although about 80 % of the population has access to electricity, power outages are common, and the unreliability of electricity supplies is severe enough to constitute a constraint on the country's overall economic development. The government had targeted capacity increases of 100,000 MW over the next ten years. As of January 2001, total installed Indian power generating capacity was 112,000 MW. The drive to increase the country's generating capacity, along with the general trend toward economic liberalization in India in the 1990s, led to much interest among foreign investors in setting up Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in India. While dozens of projects were approved, most of the largest projects have been stalled by delays in regulatory approvals and in some cases failure to secure adequate financing. India's state electricity boards (SEB's), which run the power distribution infrastructure and own most current generating capacity, are in very poor financial shape, with many of them technically insolvent. One reason is the sale of power at subsidized rates, which does not cover costs (particularly in the agricultural sector). Other problems include the high level of transmission and distribution losses and widespread power theft. Since the SEBs would be the main purchasers of power from IPP projects, resolving their financial problems is critical to attracting the capital necessary to ensure the country an adequate supply of electric power. While India currently does not have a unified national power grid, the country plans to link the SEB grids eventually, and has set up a state company, Powergrid, to oversee the unification. India also plans to establish national and state level regulatory bodies to set tariffs and promote competition. In July 1998, the Indian government announced an easing of rules related to foreign investment in the power sector. Proposals for investments up to 15 bn rupees (about $ 350 mm) involving up to 100 % foreign equity now will be approved automatically. Automatic approval will be given for investments in generation or distribution from hydroelectric, coal, lignite, oil, or gas power plants, but not for nuclear plants andassociated distribution networks. The earlier policy had allowed for only up to 74 % foreign equity. Still, the financial problems of the SEBs have prevented substantial foreign investment from flowing into India's electric power sector. India's government approved a large number of "mega- projects," defined as plants with capacity of more than 1,000 MW for thermal plants and more than 500 MW for hydroelectric plants, from the mid-to-late-1990s, but project approvals have often not led to construction. The 740-MW initial phase of the Dabhol LNG-fired power plant began operation in May 1999, and Phase II, which would add 1,440-MW of capacity, is about 90 % complete. Payment problems with the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), however, prompted Enron- backed Dabhol Power Corporation (DPC) to serve notice of breach of contract on MSEB in May 2001. Construction on Phase II was halted in June 2001. General Electric and Bechtel, each of which own existing 10 % stakes in DPC, have reportedly been negotiating in recent months for the purchase of the 65 % stake held by the now-bankrupt Enron, as well as payment guarantees from the Indian federal government. Due to the financial problems of the SEBs, a large number of foreign firms cancelled or delayed power generation projects in India between 1999 and 2001: The largest of the power projects which had obtained government approval, the $ 5 bn, 3,960-MW coal-fired Hirma Power Plant, was cancelled by Mirant Corporation in December 2001. A 1040-MW coal-fired plant at Vishakapatnam was planned by Hinduja Power and National Power (UK). In June 2001, however, the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) announced that it was withdrawing its loan to the project, throwing its future into doubt. Electricite de France has quit the coal-fired 1072-MW Bhadrawati project in Maharashtra state. The 1,886-MW LNG-fired unit at Ennore, with an associated LNG import terminal, was cancelled by CMS Energy in June 2001. CMS Energy also announced in October 2001 that it was pulling out of several smaller projects. India's National Thermal Power Company was planning a 2,000-MW LNG- fired plant at Pipavav, but the project has been shelved after BG withdrew from the LNG import terminal project in June 2001. Powergrid was planning a 1,320-MW coal-fired plant planned for Cuddalore, which was delayed indefinitely in early 2001. Cogentrix cancelled the 1,000-MW Mangalore coal-fired project in December 1999. South Korea's Daewoo Power and ABB Lummus cancelled plans for a 1,400-MW plant in Madhya Pradesh in August 2000. The DPC controversy is seen by many analysts as a test case for India's power sector, as it has demonstrated the lack of creditworthiness of the SEBs. The Dabhol plant, valued at $ 2.9 bn, is the largest single foreign investment in India. No major foreign- owned projects have been launched in the past year. The Indian government is attempting to implement reforms which would increase the financial strength of the SEBs in an attempt to attract capital back to electricity generation projects. New legislation on power sector reform was approved by the Indian cabinet in February 2002, and is to be introduced in the parliament. Environment India, the world's second most populous nation, has seen its population explode from 300 mm in 1947 to approximately 1 bn today. This rapidly growing population has placed a strain not only on India's infrastructure, but also on its environment. According to the World Health Organization, New Delhi is one of the top ten most polluted cities in the world. Two primary sources of air pollution in India are vehicular emissions and untreated industrial smoke. Coal is a major commercial energy source in India. Increased coal consumption over the past four decades has led to a nine-fold increase in energy-related carbon emissions. Environmental effects due to the relatively high use of coal in the energy mix are exacerbated by the low energy efficiency of coal-based electricity generating plants. Inefficient plants are one of the contributing factors to a steadily increasing energy consumption per unit of output (i.e. energy intensity). With the high costs associated with replacing existing coal-based plants, it is realistic to assume that these plants will continue running for the next couple of decades. India's per capita energy use and carbon emissions, while lower than the world average, result in a substantial percentage of world energy use and carbon emissions, due to the country's large population and heavy reliance on coal. Increased use of renewable energy is one means of reducing carbon emissions. Two major sources of renewable energy in India are wind power and hydroelectric plants. India's five year plan for 2002-2007 calls for 10 % of new electric generating capacity to come from renewable sources. India faces great challenges in energy and environment as it enters the 21st Century. A rapidly growing population will continue to increase demands for electricity generation and will place greater pressures on the environment to absorb increasing vehicular emissions. Source: for this report include: Business Line; CIA World Factbook 2002; Dow Jones News Wire service; Economist Intelligence Unit; Financial Times; Global Insight Asia Economic Outlook; Hindustan Times; India Today; Oil and Gas Journal; Petroleum Economist; Petroleum Intelligence Weekly; Press Trust of India wire service; Times of India; The Statesman; US Energy Information Administration; World Gas Intelligence. Country overview President: Abdul Kalam (since July 26, 2002) Prime Minister: Atal Behari Vajpayee (since March 19, 1998) Independence: August 15, 1947 (from the United Kingdom) Population (07/2002E): 1.0 bn (2nd most populous country) Location/size: Southern Asia/3.3 mm sq km 1.3 mm square miles), one- third the size of the United States Major cities: New Delhi (capital), Mumbai (Bombay), Calcutta, Chennai (Madras), Hyderabad, Bangalore, Ahmedabad Languages: Hindi, 17 other official languages, English Ethnic groups: Indo-Aryan (72 %), Dravidian (25 %), Mongoloid, other (3 %) Religions: Hindu (80 %), Muslim (14 %), Christian (2.4 %), Sikh (2 %), Buddhist (0.7 %), Jains (0.5 %), other (0.4 %) Defence (8/98): Army (980,000), Air Force (110,000), Navy (55,000), Jammu/Kashmir Border Security Force (185,000) Economic overview Currency: Rupee Exchange rate (2/24/02): $ 1 = 47.8 rupees Gross Domestic Product (GDP, FY2002E): $ 514.4 bn Real GDP growth rate (FY2002E): 4.8 % (FY2003E): 5.7 % Inflation rate (FY2002E): 3.6 % (FY2003E): 4.6 % Current account balance (FY2002E): -$ 0.9 bn Major trading partners: United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Germany, Russia Merchandise trade balance (FY2002E): -$ 7.3 bn Merchandise exports (FY2002E): $ 48.8 bn Merchandise imports (FY2002E): $ 56.1 bn Major export products: Gems and jewellery, engineering goods, clothing, cotton textiles, leather and leather manufactures, iron ore, chemicals, software Major import products: Petroleum and petroleum products, machinery, iron and steel, edible oils, chemicals, fertilizers Monetary reserves (FY 2002, non-gold): $ 46.8 bn External debt (FY2002E): $ 101.0 bn Note: FY (Fiscal Year) (FY 2002 April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003) Energy overview Energy-related ministries: Coal -- Ramvilas Paswan; Petroleum and natural gas -- Ram Naik; Electric power -- Anant Gangaram Geete Proven oil reserves (1/1/03E): 5.4 bn barrels Oil production (2002E): 759,000 bpd, of which 665,000 bpd was crude oil Oil consumption (2002E): 2.0 mm bpd Net oil imports (2002E): 1.2 mm bpd Crude oil refining capacity (1/1/03E): 2.1 mm bpd Natural gas reserves (1/1/03E): 26.9 tcf Natural gas production (2001E): 803 bn cf Natural gas consumption (2001E): 803 bn cf Recoverable coal reserves (12/31/96E): 82.4 bn short tons Coal production (2001E): 360 mm short tons Coal consumption (2001E): 339 mmst Net coal imports (2001E): 21 mmst Electric generation capacity (1/1/01E): 112 GW, including 83 GW thermal, 25 GW hydro, 2 GW nuclear Electricity generation (2001E): 533 bn kWh (79 % conventional thermal; 18 % hydro; 2 % nuclear) Environmental overview Minister for Environment and Forest: T. R. Baalu Total energy consumption (2001E): 12.8 quadrillion Btu* (3.2 % of world total energy consumption) Energy-related carbon emissions (2001E): 251.3 mm tons of carbon (3.8 % of world total carbon emissions) Per capita energy consumption (2001E): 12.6 mm Btu (vs. US value of 341.8 mm Btu) Per capita carbon emissions (2001E): 0.25 tons of carbon (vs. US value of 5.5 tons of carbon) Energy intensity (2001E): 25,307 Btu/$ 1995 (vs. US value of 10,736 Btu/ $ 1995)** Carbon intensity (2001E): 0.50 tons of carbon/thousand $ 1995 (vs. US value of 0.17 tons/thousand $ 1995)** Sectoral share of energy consumption (1998E): Industrial (41.0 %), transportation (9.5 %), residential (47.3 %),commercial (2.2 %) Sectoral share of carbon emissions (1998E): Industrial (67.3 %), transportation (15.6 %), residential (13.7 %), commercial (3.3 %) Fuel share of energy consumption (2001E): Coal (50.9 %), oil (34.4 %), natural gas (6.5 %) Fuel share of carbon emissions (2001E): Coal (64.5 %), oil (30.3 %), natural gas (5.2 %) Renewable energy consumption (1998E): 9,015 tn Btu* (2 % increase from 1997) Number of people per motor vehicle (1998): 142.9 (vs. US value of 1.3) Status in climate change negotiations: Non-Annex I country under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (ratified November 1st, 1993). Not a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol. Major environmental issues: Deforestation; soil erosion; overgrazing; desertification; air pollution from industrial effluents and vehicle emissions; water pollution from raw sewage and runoff of agricultural pesticides; tap water is not potable throughout the country; huge and rapidly growing population is overstraining natural resources. Major international environmental agreements: A party to the Antarctic-Environmental Protocol, Antarctic Treaty, Biodiversity, Climate Change, Desertification, Endangered Species, Environmental Modification, Hazardous Wastes, Law of the Sea, Nuclear Test Ban, Ozone Layer Protection, Ship Pollution, Tropical Timber 83, Tropical Timber 94, Wetlands and Whaling. * The total energy consumption statistic includes petroleum, dry natural gas, coal, net hydro, nuclear, geothermal, solar, wind, wood and waste electric power. The renewable energy consumption statistic is based on International Energy Agency (IEA) data and includes hydropower, solar, wind, tide, geothermal, solid biomass and animal products, biomass gas and liquids, industrial and municipal wastes. Sectoral shares of energy consumption and carbon emissions are also based on IEA data. **GDP based on EIA International Energy Annual 2001 Energy industry Organization: Petroleum -- ONGC, Oil India Ltd. (OIL), IOC; Natural gas -- Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL); Coal -- Coal India Limited (CIL); Electric power -- National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), National Hydroelectric Power Corporation, State Electricity Boards Major oil fields (2001 production): Bombay Offshore: Bombay High (203,355 bpd), B-38/Heera & S. Heera (48,000 bpd), Neelam (29,895 bpd); Eastern: Lakwa-Lakhmani (14,660 bpd); Western: Gandhar (40,000 bpd); Southern: Tiruvarur (51,165 bpd) Major oil terminals: Bombay, Cochin, Haldia, Kandla, Madras, Vizag Major oil refineries (1/1/03 capacity): Reliance-Jamnagar, 540,000 bpd, Koyali-Gujarat, 185,100 bpd; Mangalore, 180,000 bpd, Mathura- Uttar Pradesh, 156,000 bpd; Mahul-Bombay (Bharat Petroleum), 120,000 bpd; Madras, 130,660 bpd, Mahul-Bombay (Hindustan Petroleum), 111,700 bpd Major pipelines: Oil -- Salaya-New Delhi, Barauni-Digboi, Kandla- Bhatindu (products); Natural gas -- Hazira-Bijapur-Jagdishpur Source: EIA ---- ---------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.