Guest guest Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 US administration should pursue Vedic injunctions BY RAMESH SHARMA Buddha said, "He who fills his lamp with water will not dispel the darkness, and he who tries to light a fire with a rotten wood will fail." This is what is happening with Bush and the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussain. Trying to punish Saddam Hussain the Bush way is just like filling the lamp with water. In a similar vein, the manner in which the Bush administration is trying to proceed with its policy of disarmament can indubitably be likened to an attempt at lighting a fire with rotten wood. No doubt contemporary world is fraught with widespread tensions and conflicts. Relations among the nation states are touching the lowest ebb. There is hardly any region in the world today that is free from internecine standoffs. The legacy of the great wars that marked the twentieth century is threatening to bedevil our existence. Proliferation of weapons, both conventional and nuclear, has added to the escalating woes. The way apocalyptic politics has been unfolding itself seems to have warranted an urgent intercession on the part of spiritual realm. Spiritualism, in the present context, needs to be redefined against the perspective of twenty-first century realities. It should not be confined to the four walls of Mandir, Masjid, Church and Gumbas. In essence, spiritualism is something that wields the potentiality of bailing the world out of present smoldering impasse. Lord Krishna had promised: "Whenever righteousness declines and unrighteousness prevails, I manifest." In order to translate Lord Krishna's declaration into a reality, it is the duty of spiritual world to rise, awake and revolt against the all-pervasive anomalies and distortions that have already threatened to jeopardize our civilization. Spiritualism cannot remain aloof when it comes to combating atrocities that are insidiously eating into the fabric of human existence. Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussain is alleged of having used lethal gases against his own people. Western governments and the media have projected him as the most opprobrious incarnation of Hitler who is virtually a nonpareil in the realm of cruelty and ruthlessness. Besides, the Iraqi leader is also accused of having embarked on a nuclear pursuit that, the present US leadership believes, can be extremely detrimental to their interests. America is apprehensive about the possibility of Saddam following in the footsteps of al Qaeda that notched up an unprecedented record in the history of terrorism by crashing airlines into major US targets. President Bush's apprehensions are not unjustified. It is equally discernible that Saddam needs to be disarmed. But the million dollar question is: 'How to persuade Saddam to relinquish the obnoxious pursuit?" Should the Bush-Blair combine be allowed to ride roughshod over international norms and practices in the name of weeding out Iraqi dictator? Should the international community reduce itself to passive spectator when the Anglo-American forces make a blatant mockery of the United Nations by making unilateral decision to go to war? Isn't it imperative that the entire options get exhausted before declaring war against any country? Millions of people across the globe have been demonstrating against war on Iraq. Perhaps it is not because they love Saddam. Certainly, it is because they don't want to ensure that an odious precedence of preemptive strike is established. Meantime, they have a strong contempt for the emergence of an order wherein 'end justifies the means'. Therefore, it is their tacit demand that even Saddam be given ample opportunity to prove his bona fides, if he desires so. It is true that while dealing with the UN inspection team Saddam is not found to have been in a 'material breach'. On the flip side, the United States should also rectify its foreign policies underscored by supercilious overtones. The US administration should cease to harbor any discrimination when it comes to treating Israel and its Arabian neighbors, Palestinians being the prominent one. The way the authoritarian regimes of the Middle East have been pampered is also responsible for subjecting the US to endemic reproach. American administration should not expect the United Nations to play second fiddle to its eccentricities. Most important, the US approach itself virtually premised on 'clashes of civilization' should undergo perspicacious transformation to ensure that the Islamic world begins to develop some sort of predisposition towards cordial and fruitful coexistence with the West. 'Sangachchhadhwam, Sambadadhwam!' (Let's walk together, let's speak together). The US, however a hyperpower on earth, should not veer from this Vedic injunction. Swami Vivekananda said, "Do not care for doctrines, do not care for dogmas, or sects, or churches or temples; they count for little compared with the essence of existence in each man which is spirituality and the more this is developed in a man, the more powerful is he for good." Politics today has lost this vision. It has been an instrument of tyranny and despotism. It is primarily responsible for ongoing degeneration. Therefore, it has to be rejuvenated by its solemn intermingling with spiritual values. The synergy thus created will certainly pave the ground for enduring peace and harmony in human society. Apparently, having been driven by entrenched vengeance the US, instead of unleashing diatribes against alleged 'axis of evils', should concentrate itself in giving a solemn direction to international politics. Because, violence cannot be a solution to violence. And war cannot be a precursor to peace and stability. It has been amply demonstrated by what is happening in Afghanistan that had almost been destroyed by US in the Aftermath of September 11. The Iraqi leadership will also suffer a devastating nemesis if it fails to comply with the will and aspirations of international community and disarm itself as per resolution 1441 of the United Nations Security Council. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.