Guest guest Posted June 20, 2003 Report Share Posted June 20, 2003 Hare Krishna Alexandra, > In Hinduism it is common to regard one's Ishtadevata as supreme and > all other deities as aspects or manifestations of him/her. > For instance, the Shaivas regard Shiva as Parabrahman and respect > Vishnu, Krishna, Brahma, etc. as aspects or manifestations of Shiva > and the goddesses such as Lakshmi, Radha, Sarasvati, etc. as aspects > or manifestations of Shakti-Devi. > The Shaktas also respect the other deities. > But the Gaudiya Vaishnavas seem to hold the view that only Krishna > is god, all other deities are mere demi-gods. Hinduism is a misleading term. See: www.veda.harekrsna.cz/bhaktiyoga/vaisnavism.htm#2 www.veda.harekrsna.cz/bhaktiyoga/vaisnavism.htm#3 Istadeva's choice depends on one's advancement. On material level it is influenced by three gunas and the Lord as Paramatma supports such faith (see Bhagavad Gita 7.21 and further) but doesn't approve of it (BG 7.20-23, 9.23-25). On transcendental level this choice is a matter of rasa, relationship with a particular form of the Lord in one's svarupa. > Why? Did Sri Chaitanya preach that? > Is this view shared by all Vaishnava sects, or are there branches of > the Vaishnava tradition that follow the classical Hindu tradition? What you consider a classical tradition - i.e. worship of many devas for any purpose imaginable - is a distortion stemming from Adi Sankaracarya's pancopasana. Before him there existed a worship of Visnu/Krishna. See: www.veda.harekrsna.cz/encyclopedia/mayavada.htm (VII. D. Vedanta according to early Buddhist records) Real classical Vedic tradition consists of Vaishnava, Saiva and Sakta schools of interpretation of Vedas. To my knowledge this view is shared by all Vaishnava sampradayas. > On which scriptures do they base their view, and on whose > interpretation of these scriptures? Sattvic Puranas and sattvic Tantras (Pancaratras) interpreted by all Vaisnava acaryas-founders of the four main sampradayas and their followers (too many to enumerate). Their interpretations were defended in scholarly debates and prevailed over Sankara's views. In these sastras Visnu/Krisna is shown to be the Supreme Lord and everyone else as His expansion/servant. Rajasic sastras present Siva and tamasic sastras Devi as the Supreme. The best elaboration you can find in Sri Jiva Gosvami's Tattva Sandarbha. www.veda.harekrsna.cz/encyclopedia/pramana.htm Your servant, bh. Jan www.veda.harekrsna.cz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.