CAN MEAT EATERS BE SAVED? Pt 1 Mavavadi 'Vegetarianism', Pt 2 Asceticism

[Guest guest]

CAN MEAT EATERS BE SAVED?: UNDERSTANDING MORTAL VERSUS VENIAL SIN

AND PERSONAL CULPABILITY

 

by BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI

 

CONTENTS OF THIS PAPER:

 

PART 1. CAN MEAT EATERS BE SAVED? : THE RECENT HISTORY

OF 'VEGETARIANISM' AND OCCULT ARYANISM

 

PART 2. CAN MEAT EATERS BE SAVED? : SIN AND ITS EFFECT IN THE

CONSIDERATIONS OF JUDEO-CHRISTIAN ASCETICISM AND MORAL

THEOLOGY ....UNDERSTANDING PERSONAL CULPABILITY AND MORTAL VERSUS

VENIAL SIN

 

***********************

 

 

PART 1. CAN MEAT EATERS BE SAVED? PART ONE: VEGETARIANISM AND OCCULT

ARYANISM

 

A DEVOTEE ASKED:

 

 

"DO NON-VEGETARIAN, GOOD AND DEVOTED CHRISTIANS, JEWS AND FOR THAT

MATTER VAISHNAVAS ATTAIN THE FINAL DESTINATION ? FROM JESUS' WORDS

IT APPEARS THAT "WHAT CONDEMNS IS WHAT COMES OUT OF THE MOUTH AND NOT

WHAT GOES INTO IT...KINGDOM OF GOD IS NOT ABOUT EATING AND DRINKING

ETC..." "ISKCON DEVOTEES DISAGREE ON THIS POINT. PLEASE CLARIFY

MAHARAJ."

 

BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI'S ANSWER:

 

'VEGETARIANISM' AS A MODERN RELIGION, AND ITS HISTORICAL CONNECTION

TO MAYAVADI AND VOIDIST OCCULT ARYANISM

 

WHILE 'FLESH ABSTINENCE' HAS A LONG HISTORY IN JUDEO-CATHOLIC AND

EVEN PROTESTANT CHRISTIAN ASCETICISM OR PIETY, AND CONTINUES TO HAVE

JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN PRACTITIONERS AND ADVOCATES TODAY, THE MAYAVADI

HINDU AND BUDDHIST-RELATED ESOTERIC RELIGION OF ARYAN

OCCULT 'VEGETARIANISM' IS A RECENT HISTORICAL PHENOMENON.

THIS 'WESTERN' RELIGION OF VEGETARIANISM HAS CONSISTENTLY

MISREPRESENTED JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY AS ESSENTIALLY BLOOD-THIRSTY,

DEGRADED, CORRUPT OR EVEN DIABOLICAL RELIGIONS, ONLY FIT FOR THE

LOWEST OF MANKIND. THIS NEW GLOBALLY PROMOTED RELIGION OF

VEGETARIANISM WAS AGRESSIVELY PROMOTED BY WESTERN ARYANIST WHITE

RACIST OCCULTISTS FROM ITS VERY BEGINNING. THEY IMAGINED THEMSELVES

TO BE A SUPER RACE AND THAT THEIR RACE WAS HISTORICALLY OPPOSED BY

THE BLACK RACES AND MIXED RACES, ESPECIALLY WHAT THE ARYAN RACISTS

IMAGINED TO BE THE (SEMITIC) MUD (MIXED) 'RACE' OF THE JEWS.

 

THE RELIGION OF VEGETARIANISM EXCLUSIVELY EQUATED 'VEGETARIANISM'

WITH THE OCCULT WEST'S 'HIDDEN HIGHER WISDOM' OF THE EAST, AND

JUXTAPOSED THIS 'HIGHER' (ATHEISTIC) 'INNER WISDOM' / GNOSTIC

TRADITION' AGAINST THE EXOTERIC MONOTHEISTIC TRADITIONS OF THE 'WEST'

AND THEIR 'BLOOD THIRSTY', BARBARIC TRIBAL DEMIGOD, YAHWEH OF THE

BIBLE'S SUPPOSEDLY DEGRADED 'ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS'. IN THIS OCCULT

RELIGION, MAYAVADI IMPERSONALISM OR VOIDIST ATHEISM WAS EXALTED AS

THE 'HIDDEN HIGHER WISDOM' AT THE SECRET CORE OR APEX OF THE

WORLD'S 'GREAT RELIGIONS'. STUDENTS IN THE HIGHER INITIATED DEGREES

OF THIS SECRET LORE LEARNED TO SEE WORLD HISTORY IN TERMS OF A BATTLE

BETWEEN (WHITE) ARYANS AND THEIR SUPREME BRAHMAN AND COSMIC ARYAN

DEVA GODS, AND THE CURSED OR BESTIAL BLACK RACE AND MIXED MUD RACES

AND THEIR REBELLIOUS ENVIOUS TRIBAL DEMIGOD YAHWEH, WHO THEY

IDENTIFIED WITH THE EAST'S DEVA-ANTAGONIST ASURA-DEMONS. THUS THEY

CREATED AN ARTIFICIAL DICHOTOMY BETWEEN THE RELIGIONS OF THE EAST AND

WEST, AND PROMOTED 'ARYAN' HINDU MAYAVADA AND THERAVADIN BUDDHIST

VOIDISM AGAINST ABRAHAMIC MONOTHEISM. THE MAIN SPOKESPERSONS OF THIS

OCCULT WORLD VIEW, SUCH AS H.P. BLAVATSKY AND ALBERT PIKE,

ARTICULATED 'WHITE' RACIST DOCTRINES OF ARYANISM. IN BLAVATSKY'S

ROOT RACES IDEOLOGY, THE PERSONAL GODS OF ALL THE MONOTHEISTS ARE ALL

DARK "Ma-Mo Chohans". WHEN SHE ARTICULATED HER RACIST ARYAN ROOT-

RACES IDEAS, SHE ASSOCIATED THE ARYANS WITH THE COSMIC CHOHANS OF

LIGHT, AND THE NON-ARYANS WITH THE COSMIC MA-MO CHOHANS OF DARKNESS.

EVERY OCCULT SOCIETY HISTORICALLY RLEATED TO THEOSOPHY SINCE HAS

CONTINUED THIS ASSOCIATION. PLEASE NOTE IN HER FORGED 'MAHATMA'

LETTER BELOW, THAT SHE UNEQUIVICOALLY IDENTIFIES HERSELF AS A

THERAVADIN (VOIDIST) BUDDHIST AND BLANKETLY CONDEMNS MONOTHEISM!

SHE EVEN STATES THAT IT IS NOT ENOUGH FOR HINDUS ("...100 of

thousands of Fakirs, Sannyasis and Saddhus leading the most pure

lives,...") TO BE PERFECTLY PIOUS, BUT THEY ARE "on the path of

error,..." IF THEY ARE NOT HER FOLLOEWERS !!! SO WE SEE THAT THE

AGENDA OF THE ARYAN OCCULTISTS WAS NOT JUST TO PROMOTE WHITE

SUPERIORITY AND POWER, OR 'VEGETARIAN' PIETY ETC, BUT WAS FROM THE

BEGINNING TO PROMOTE THERAVADIN BUDDHIST-LIKE ATHEISM AND VOIDISM.

 

http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/mahatma/ml-134.htm The Mahatma

Letters to A. P. Sinnett Theosophical University Press Edition

Letter No. 134 Dehra Dun. Friday. 4th.

It is useless for a member to argue 'I am one of a pure life, I am a

teetotaller and an abstainer from meat and vice. All my aspirations

are for good etc.' and he, at the same time, building by his acts and

deeds an impassable barrier on the road between himself and us. What

have we, the disciples of the true Arhats, of esoteric Buddhism and

of Sang-gyas to do with the Shasters and Orthodox Brahmanism? There

are 100 of thousands of Fakirs, Sannyasis and Saddhus leading the

most pure lives, and yet being as they are, on the path of error,

never having had an opportunity to meet, see or even hear of us.

Their forefathers have driven away the followers of the only true

philosophy upon earth away from India and now, it is not for the

latter to come to them but to them to come to us if they want us.

Which of them is ready to become a Buddhist, a Nastika as they call

us? None. Those who have believed and followed us have had their

reward. Mr. Sinnett and Hume are exceptions. Their beliefs are no

barrier to us for they have none. They may have had influences around

them, bad magnetic emanations the result of drink, Society and

promiscuous physical associations (resulting even from shaking hands

with impure men) but all this is physical and material impediments

which with a little effort we could counteract and even clear away

without much detriment to ourselves. Not so with the magnetism and

invisible results proceeding from erroneous and sincere beliefs.

Faith in the Gods and God, and other superstitions attracts millions

of foreign influences, living entities and powerful agents around

them, with which we would have to use more than ordinary exercise of

power to drive them away. We do not choose to do so. We do not find

it either necessary or profitable to lose our time waging war to the

unprogressed Planetaries who delight in personating gods and

sometimes well known characters who have lived on earth. There are

Dhyan-Chohans and "Chohans of Darkness," not what they term devils

but imperfect "Intelligences" who have never been born on this or any

other earth or sphere no more than the "Dhyan Chohans" have and who

will never belong to the "builders of the Universe," the pure

Planetary Intelligences, who preside at every Manvantara while the

Dark Chohans preside at the Pralayas. Explain this to Mr. Sinnett (I

CAN'T) -- tell him to read over what I said to them in the few things

I have explained to Mr. Hume; and let him remember that as all in

this universe is contrast (I cannot translate it better) so the light

of the Dhyan Chohans and their pure intelligence is contrasted by

the "Ma-Mo Chohans" -- and their destructive intelligence. These are

the gods the Hindus and Christians and Mahomed and all others of

bigoted religions and sects worship; and so long as their influence

is upon their devotees we would no more think of associating with or

counteracting them in their work than we do the Red-Caps on earth

whose evil results we try to palliate but whose work we have no right

to meddle with so long as they do not cross our path. (You will not

understand this, I suppose. But think well over it and you will. M.

means here, that they have no right or even power to go against the

natural or that work which is prescribed to each class of beings or

existing things by the law of nature. The Brothers, for instance

could prolong life but they could not destroy death, not even for

themselves. They can to a degree palliate evil and relieve suffering;

they could not destroy evil. No more can the Dhyan Chohans impede the

work of the Mamo Chohans, for their Law is darkness, ignorance,

destruction etc., as that of the former is Light, knowledge and

creation. The Dhyan Chohans answer to Buddh, Divine Wisdom and Life

in blissful knowledge, and the Ma-mos are the personification in

nature of Shiva, Jehovah and other invented monsters with Ignorance

at their tail).

 

TO THE ARYANISTS LIKE HPB, SRI KRISHNA WAS ONE OF THEIR OCCULT

MASTERS OF THE IMPERSONAL OR VOIDIST 'HIGHER WISDOM'. HE WAS NOT A

TRANSCENDENT PERSONAL GOD AT ALL, BUT RATHER WAS A 'SELF REALIZED'

ASCENDED MASTER, ONE OF THE 'WHITE BROTHERHOOD' OF THEIR

FICTIONAL 'ASCENDED MASTERS', ALONG WITH THEIR 'ARYAN JESUS' AND

OTHER APPROPRIATED AND FICTIONALIZED RELIGIOUS OR HISTORICAL

FIGURES.

 

BECAUSE THIS WORLD VIEW IGNORED, DENIED OR DIABOLIZED THE HISTORICAL

REALITY OR AT LEAST THE IMPORTANCE OF EASTERN MONOTHEISM IN DEVOTION

TO VISHNU, SHIVA AND SHAKTI, GLOBALLY IT PROMOTED THE GROSSLY

ERRONEOUS IDEA THAT 'HINDUISM' WAS PRIMARILY MONISTIC OR POLYTHEISTIC

AND 'BUDDHISM' WAS PRIMARILY VOIDIST. THIS FURTHER DROVE A

PERCEPTUAL WEDGE BETWEEN THE GREAT BHAKTI TRADITIONS OF THE EAST AND

WEST. IN CONCLUSION, THE RACIST ARYANIST PARADIGM CONTRASTED THE

ARYAN SUPER RACE'S IMPERSONAL 'HIDDEN HIGHER WISDOM' OF THE EAST,

WITH THE DEGRADED WORSHIP OF THE BLOOD-THIRSTY BIBLICAL DEITY AND HIS

ASURIC DEMONIC FOLLOWERS, THE DESCENDENTS OF 'SHEM' AND 'HAM' IE,

THE 'MUD' MIXED RACES, ESPECIALLY THE SEMITES AND THE BLACK RACES,

WHO WERE PRESENTED AS BARELY HUMAN, IF HUMAN AT ALL. THE ARYAN

HIGHER WISDOM WAS ASSOCIATED WITH VEGETARIANISM AND ALL KINDS OF

HINDU CASTE-LIKE 'PURITY' RESTRICTIONS. IT CONVENIENTLY DISTORTED

AND ABUSED, IGNORED, OR SUPPRESSED ANY EVIDENCE OF ACTUAL CONNECTIONS

BETWEEN EASTERN AND WESTERN DEVOTIONAL MONOTHEISMS, AND CREATED AN

ARTIFICIAL DICHOTOMY BETWEEN THE GOD(S) OF THE ARYAN 'VEGETARIAN'

EAST, AND THE 'BLOOD THIRSTY GOD' OF THE ASURIC ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS.

 

BELOW IS A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SOME OF THE PARTICULARS OF HOW THIS

WORLD-VIEW DEVELOPED AND SPREAD, AND HOW IT HAS INFLUENCED ATTITUDES

TOWARDS JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY IN THE HARE KRISHNA MOVEMENT. IF

ONE DOUBTS THAT 'VEGETARIANISM' IN THE MOVEMENT HAS BEEN COUPLED WITH

THEOSOPHY AND OCCULT-RELATED ANTI-JUDEO-CHRISTIAN (ESPECIALLY ANTI-

CATHOLIC) HATE-MONGERING, IT IS EASILY CONFIRMED BY VISITING MANY

WEBSITES AND READING THE BOOKS ETC. OF MOVEMENT DEVOTEES, INCLUDING

SENIOR LEADERS AND EVEN GURUS. THEIR DISCUSSIONS OF RELIGION

RELATIVE TO VEGETARIANISM ALMOST INVARIABLY USE ACTUAL WESTERN

ESOTERIC OR ARYANIST SOURCES, IN SOME SUBTLE OR OVERT 'ARYANIST'

DOCTRINAL ATTACK ON THE BIBLICAL RELIGIONS AND THEIR 'BLOOD THIRSTY'

GOD.

 

PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE ISSUE DISCUSSED HEREIN IS NOT THE GENERAL

MORALITY OF FLESH ABSTINENCE VERSUS FLESH EATING OR ANIMAL

SACRIFICE. ASCETICISM HAS ALWAYS BEEN RELATED TO IDEAS OF HOLINESS

IN THE ABRAHAMIC TRADITIONS, AND FLESH ABSTINENCE HAS ALWAYS BEEN ONE

OF THE MAIN ABRAHAMIC ASCETICAL PRACTICES.

HOWEVER, EVEN IN INDIA AMONG 'BRAHMINS', FLESH EATING HAS NOW BECOME

COMMON IN SOME AREAS AND SOCIAL GROUPS. SO IT IS CLEAR THAT IN BOTH

THE EAST AND WEST, THERE WAS THE SAME ANCIENT ASCETICAL IDEAL OF

HOLINESS, BUT THE DEGENERATIVE INFLUENCES OF THE AGE HAVE ERODED THE

KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE OF ASCETICISM IN BOTH REGIONS.

 

IN THE BHAKTI TRADITIONS SURRENDERED 'FAITH' AND THE GRACE OF THE

PERSONAL GOD ARE SUPREME. MORALITY IS A RESPONSE TO GOD'S LOVE, NOT

A MEANS TO BECOMING GOD. IN THE ATHEISTIC TRADITIONS OF THE EAST,

ONE MAY GAIN A HIGHER MATERIAL STATUS THROUGH MORALITY, AND MAY EVEN

ATTAIN 'BRAHMAN' IMPERSONAL GOD-HOOD THROUGH THE PRACTICE OF KARMA

YOGA AND AUSTERITIES. THUS THE ATHEISTS PLACE NO VALUE ON THE

FRIENDSHIP, MERCY, LOVE OR GRACE OF A SUPREME GOD, AND PREACH A PURE

DOCTRINE OF 'WORKS', WHICH MAY INCLUDE MANY KINDS OF MANDATORY AND

OPPRESSIVE ASCETICAL PRACTICES, CASTE AND PURIFACTORY OBLIGATIONS AND

RESTRICTIONS. WHERE THE BHAKTI TRADITIONS HAVE BEEN INFLUENCED BY

CONTACT WITH THIS KIND OF GRACE-LESS IMPERSONAL RELIGIOUS LEGALISM,

THEY HAVE SHIFTED THEIR TEACHING EMPHASIS FROM FOCUSING ON GOD'S

MERCY, ACCESSIBILITY AND ATTAINABILITY, TO FOCUSING ON HIS RIGHTEOUS

HOLINESS, REMOTENESS AND INAPPROACHABILITY. TO SUCH SPIRITUAL

ELITISTS, ONLY THE MOST SEVERE AND PERFECT ASCETICS WILL GAIN THE

BEATIFIC VISION AND DWELL IN THE PERSONAL PRESENCE OF THE ORIGINAL

SUPREME PERSONALITY OF GODHEAD. FOR THEM GOD'S LOVE AND GRACE AND

POWER TO PURIFY SEEMS INADEQUATE TO THE TASK OF OUR SALVATION.

EITHER THAT, OR THEIR GOD SIMPLY LACKS THE WILL TO PURIFY US AND

BRING US BACK TO GODHEAD ! IN EITHER CASE, FOR SUCH LEGALISTS, THE

DOCTRINE OF THE SAVING GRACE OF GOD HAS BEEN MINIMIZED, AND THE

NECESSITY OF THE EXTREME EFFORT OF THE SOUL TO EARN THEIR WAY INTO

THE DIVINE PRESENCE HAS BEEN MAXIMIZED.

 

CATHOLIC THEOLOGY AFFIRMED BOTH THE IMPORTANCE OF GRACE AND WORKS BY

SHOWING THAT AUTHENTIC CHRISTIAN 'WORKS', WHICH ARE ALWAYS MOTIVATED

BY LOVE, ALWAYS FLOW FROM A SOUL TOUCHED BY GRACE. GRACE COMES

FIRST, AND THE HUMAN HEART RESPONDS TO GRACE BY LOVING AND LIVING

WELL, PERFORMING GOOD WORKS AS A NATURAL RESPONSE TO HAVING FIRST

BEEN LOVED BY GOD! GOD HAS FIRST LOVED US. IF WE HAVE ANY GENUINE

LOVE TO GIVE, IT IS BECAUSE HE HAS GRACED US WITH IT. WORKS

UNDERTAKEN SELFISHLY WITHOUT LOVE, FOR SOME MUNDANE MOTIVATION OF

REWARD, MAY HAVE SOME MATERIALLY BENEFICIAL RESULT, BUT THEY CAN

NEVER GAIN ONE THE BEATIFIC VISION. IT IS GOD'S LOVE THAT REACHES

OUT TO US IN THE PERSON OF THE REDEEMER, AND IT IS HIS LOVE IN US

THAT RESPONDS, DRAWING US BACK INTO HIS SPIRITUAL FELLOWSHIP IN OUR

REDEEMER'S SAVING EMBRACE. WORKS WITHOUT LOVE MAY EASE OUR

CONSCIENCE OR EVEN PUFF-US-UP OR MAKE US POWERFUL AND VENERATED, BUT

SUCH WORKS HAVE NO POWER TO SAVE US FROM LOVE-LESS-NESS IN THIS WORLD

OR THE NEXT.

 

 

ALTHOUGH SRILA PRABHUPADA STRONGLY PREACHED ASCETIC MORALITY, HE

NEVER EXALTED IT OVER THE DOCTRINE OF GOD'S PERSONAL SAVING GRACE.

HE CONSTANTLY CONDEMNED THE IMPERSONAL HINDU EMPHASIS ON WORKS (KARMA

YOGA) AND EXALTED THE DOCTRINES AND PRACTICES OF BHAKTI YOGA OVER

THOSE OF MUNDANE KARMA YOGA. HE DECLARED THAT OURS WAS A CALL "BACK

TO GODHEAD", NOT A MISSION TO RECRUIT SOULS FOR A MERE GOOD-KARMIC

TRIP TO SOME 'HIGHER' MATERIAL PLANETARY SYSTEM ! HE BROUGHT THE

RELIGION OF SRI SRI RADHA-KRISHNA AND BALARAMAS' SAVING GRACE TO THE

WESTERN CULTURES, NOT THE RELIGION OF 'VEGETARIANISM' THAT DENIES NOT

ONLY THE POWER-TO-SAVE OF ANY PERSONAL GOD, BUT THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH

A GOD AT ALL.

 

 

 

HOW 'VEGETARIANISM' IS GLOBALLY RELATED TO WHITE RACIST OCCULT

ATHEISTIC ARYANISM

 

FOR OVER 100 YEARS VEGETARIANISM HAS BEEN USED AS THE PRIMARY PUBLIC

RELATIONS 'HOOK' OF WESTERN ESOTERICISM TO CATCH SOULS AND REEL THEM

INTO ESOTERIC ARYANISM. IF WE LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF WESTERN WHITE

RACIST (OCCULT) ARYANISM, FROM ITS BEGINNING AND IN ITS GREATEST

DEVELOPMENT IN THE OCCULT MASONIC RELATED AND THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENTS,

ESOTERIC ARYANISM HAS ALWAYS USED VEGETARIANISM AS ONE PRIMARY MEANS

TO RECRUIT PEOPLE. THIS IS SUCH A PROBLEM THAT BY THE EARLY 20TH

CENTURY THE CATHOLIC AND OTHER MAINSTREAM CHRISTIAN CHURCHES WERE

ALREADY ASSOCIATING THE GLOBAL VEGETARIAN MOVEMENT WITH THE COVERED

ATHEISM OF OCCULT SOCIETIES, ANTI-SEMITISM, OCCULTISM, IMPERSONAL

ATHEISM, NEO-PAGAN POLYTHEISM AND NEO-BUDDHIST WESTERN

EXTREME 'APOPHATIC' ABYSS VOIDISM.

 

THE RESULT OF THE ATHEISTS USING VEGETARIANISM AS A KIND OF DISEASE

VECTOR TO SPREAD DOUBT, FEAR AND HATRED OF GOD AND HIS CHURCH, WAS

THAT MAIN-STREAM CHRISTIANITY GREW TO ASSOCIATE FLESH ABSTINENCE,

WHICH WAS AN ANCIENT PRACTICE OF JUDEO-CATHOLIC PIETY, MORE AND MORE

EXCLUSIVELY WITH ANTI-YAHWIST ANTI-JUDEO CHRISTIAN, ATHEISTIC,

POLYTHEISTIC AND IMPERSONAL PANTHEISTIC OR MONIST RELIGIOUS FORCES.

THUS THE MAIN STREAM CHURCHES DEVELOPED A KIND OF AVERSION

TO 'VEGETARIANISM'. VEGETARIANISM BECAME RIGHTLY ASSOCIATED WITH

MORTAL DANGERS TO ONE'S FAITH. PARENTS DREADED THEIR CHILDREN TO

TAKE IT UP, BECAUSE SOON THEY WOULD BECOME PUFFED-UP 'HOLIER THAN

THOU' AND ALIENATED FROM THEIR FAMILIES. THEY WOULD GROW TO HATE THE

CHURCH AND THEN GOD HIMSELF. THEY WOULD REJECT THE SAVING JESUS OF

CHRISTIAN PERSONALISM FOR THE COSMIC CHRIST OF MAYAVADI PSEUDO-HINDU

OR PSEUDO-BUDDHISM, MUSLIM SUFISM OR WESTERN OCCULTISM. THEY WOULD

REJECT THE COSMIC REDEEMING JEWISH MESSIAH JESUS FOR THE MORTAL ARYAN

CHRIST WHO LEARNED MYSTICAL POWERS IN INDIA AND DIED IN KASHMIR.

 

THIS IS WHAT WAS HAPPENING IN A HUGE WAY DURING THE GREAT FLOWERING

OF THE BACK-TO-THE -LAND NEO-PAGAN ARYANISM MOVEMENT IN PRE THIRD

REICH GERMANY. THE SPREAD OF ANTI-JEWISH-JESUS OCCULT-CHRIST

ARYANISM THROUGHOUT 'WHITE' SOCIETIES FROM THE TIME OF BLAVATSKY

ONWARD WAS RAPID AND CONCENTRATED BOTH IN THE DISGRUNTLED WHITE

UNDERCLASS, AND THE ECONOMICALLY POWERFUL SOCIALLY PRIVILEGED AND

INTELLECTUAL ELITE, AND PROTESTANT (ESPECIALLY ANGLO-GERMANIC) OCCULT

SOCIETIES. THESE PERSONS IMAGINED THEMSELVES TO BE THE ARYANS OR

BRAHMINICAL MASTER RACE.

 

THE PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC IDEA OF THE WHITE MASTER RACE GREW OUT OF

SOCIAL DARWINISM. THE WHOLE DARWINIST EUGENICS PROJECT, THAT

RESULTED IN THE WWII HOLOCAUST, WAS ROOTED IN WHITE RACIST ARYANISM.

IN FACT DARWIN'S SON WAS THE LEADER OF THE FIRST EVER EUGENICS

SOCIETY. ALL ALONG THE WAY ARYANIST WHITE RACISM

WAS CLOSELY ASSOCIATED WITH NORSE OR WHITE NEO-PAGANISM AND A STRANGE

FASCINATION WITH VEGETARIANISM. IT WAS STRANGE BECAUSE THEIR

ROMANTICIZED 'ARYAN' ANGLO-GERMANIC TRIBES WERE HUNTERS AND FLESH

EATERS, NOT PRIMARILY AGRICULTURALISTS. NON-THE-LESS 'VEGETARIANISM'

BECAME SOMETHING USEFUL TO THE NEO-PAGANS AND OCCULTISTS, WITH WHICH

TO ATTACK THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION. AS NORDIC SO-CALLED

ARYANISM HATED AND OPPOSED JUDEO-CHRISTIANITY, IT ALLIED ITSELF TO

EASTERN TRADITIONS THAT WERE SUPPOSEDLY STARTED BY RACIAL 'ARYANS'.

BLOND NORTHERN EUROPEAN 'ARYANS' HAD ALWAYS FEARED AND HATED THE

DARKER 'MIXED RACE' TRIBES OF SOUTHERN EUROPE AND THE MEDITERRANEAN.

IT DID NOT HELP THAT THESE SOUTHERN TRIBES WERE OFTEN CONQUERING THE

NORTH. TO THE BLOND NORTHERNERS, CHRISTIANITY WAS ULTIMATELY JUST

ANOTHER IMPOSITION OF ROME (THE MIXED RACES OF THE SOUTH) ON THE

UNMIXED 'WHITE' PEOPLE OF THE NORTH. WHEN THE ANTI-CATHOLIC GNOSTIC

AND MUSLIM INFLUENCED PROTESTANT OCCULT SOCIETIES ALLIED THEMSELVES

TO EASTERN ARYANISM, A POWERFULLY DESTRUCTIVE FORCE CAME INTO

EXISTENCE. H.P. BLAVATSKY AND HER FRIENDS ALLIED THEMSELVES TO SRI

LANKAN THERAVADIN (VOIDIST) BUDDHISM, AND THEN TO INDIAN MAYAVADA,

AND THEN TO TIBETAN TANTRISM. IN THE USA, ALBERT PIKE SYSTEMATIZED

HIS OWN PSEUDO-HISTORY AND IDEOLOGY OF RACIST ARYANISM. SO FROM THE

EAST (ARYANIST THEOSOPHY) AND THE WEST (PIKE'S ARYANIST MASONRY) A

GREAT EVIL POURED FORTH INFECTING THE 'WHITE' RACE GLOBALLY.

EXTERNALLY THIS EVIL WAS GARBED IN PIETY, A PIETY THAT

INCLUDED 'VEGETARIANISM' AND PROMOTED A BUDDHIST-LIKE OR MAYAVADI

ARYAN CHRIST. IN THE USA THE KU KLUX KLAN EVOLVED OUT OF PIKE'S

RACIST ARYANISM, AND IN THE ANGLO-GERMANIC WORLD OF EUROPE,

BLAVATSKY'S ARYANISM INFLUENCED THE RISE OF THE THIRD REICH. ALL

ALONG THE OUTWARD FACE OF THIS MOVEMENT WAS 'PIOUS' AND

PROMOTED 'VEGETARIANISM'.

 

THUS THERE IS A PROFOUNDLY EVIL MODERN HISTORY OF ATHEISM AND RACISM

TIED TO 'VEGETARIANISM', THAT IS INEXTRICABLY ASSOCIATED WITH THE

WHOLE OCCULT ARYANIST MOVEMENT. THUS IT IS NOT SURPRISING AT ALL THAT

THE MAIN-STREAM JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN BODIES BEGAN TO TREAT THE

STRANGE 'ARYAN' RELIGION OF 'VEGETARIANISM' AS A DANGER TO FAITH AND

MORALS.

 

LOOK AT THE WORD AND ITS USE. IT IS A RELIGION WITH LOTS OF

HISTORICAL BAGGAGE. THAT BAGGAGE IS LOADED WITH GNOSTIC, NEO-GNOSTIC

AND OCCULT ANTI-YAHWISM THAT IS ESSENTIALLY MAYAVADI AND

PROFOUNDLY 'ARYAN' OR WHITE RACIST.

 

WHEN SRILA PRABHUPADA BROUGHT AUTHENTIC GAUDIYA VAISHNAVISM TO THE

WEST, HIS PRESENTATION WAS STILL RELATIVELY PURE AND FREE OF WESTERN

ESOTERIC ARYANISM. THIS PRESENTED A NEW OPPORTUNITY, AN

HISTORICALLY 'TEACHABLE MOMENT' FOR JEWS AND CHRISTIANS TO RECONSIDER

FLESH ABSTINENCE FROM THE UNIVERSAL NON-SECTARIAN MORAL PERSPECTIVE,

WITHOUT ANY ANTI-YAHWIST TEACHINGS ATTACHED. HOWEVER, THE HARE

KRISHNA MOVEMENT WAS QUICKLY HI-JACKED BY NEW AGE ARYANISTS AMONG HIS

HIPPIE OCCULT-FASCINATED DISCIPLES, AND THESE PERSONS COMPLETELY

POLLUTED HIS PURE BHAKTI YOGA MOVEMENT WITH ALL THE SAME OLD ESOTERIC

ARYANISM STUFF AGAIN.

 

THEY INTRODUCED THE BASIC TENANTS OF THEOSOPHY AND IN THEIR HANDS THE

WHOLE MISSION WAS DIVERTED INTO JUST ANOTHER BUT MORE POWERFUL NEW

AGE VECTOR FOR ANTI-JEWISH AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN ARYANIST

PROPAGANDA.

 

LIKE FISHERMEN, THE ARYANIST LEADERS OF ISKCON DANGLED ATTRACTIVE

TEACHINGS OF NON-SECTARIANISM, AHIMSA, 'LOVE AND TRUST' ETC. IN FRONT

OF PEOPLE, AND ONCE THEY WERE HOOKED, CONSUMED THEIR VICTIMS LIVES

WITH THE SAME IMPERSONAL CALLOUSNESS THAT THE NAZIS EXHIBITED IN

THEIR DEATH CAMPS.

 

I WAS THERE. I SAW IT. MY FAMILY AND I EXPERIENCED IT. THERE IS A

CADRE OF COVERED NEO-NAZIS IN ISKCON AND THE MOVEMENT, AND THEIR

DEFINING WORLD-VIEW IS HATRED FOR THE JEWISH GOD, THE JEWS AND

CHRISTIANS, WHO WORSHIP THE JEWISH GOD AND HIS JEWISH MESSIAH

JESUS. THEIR PREACHING HAS A HIDDEN OBJECTIVE. EXOTERICALLY THEY

APPEAR TO BE TEACHING SATTVIC LIVING AND PURE GAUDIYA VAISHNAVISM,

BUT ESOTERICALLY THEIR MISSION IS TO DESTROY FAITH IN THE GOD OF THE

BIBLE, AND HIS MESSIAH JESUS. WHILE SPEAKING THE FLOWERY WORDS OF

THE VEDAS, THEY ARE HOOKING AND TRAPPING / ENSLAVING SOULS FOR THEIR

OWN SERVICE, NOT FOR THE SERVICE OF GOD AND HIS SAINTS. THUS WE HAVE

SEEN THE HORRIFIC FRUIT OF THEIR EFFORTS, IN THE ATROCITIES COMMITTED

IN THE MOVEMENT. EXOTERICALLY THE DANGEROUS LEADERS HAVE BEEN AND

ARE VAISHNAVAS, BUT ESOTERICALLY THEY HAVE BEEN AND ARE

IMPERSONALISTS AND ARYANIST ELITISTS, WHOSE ONLY ACCEPTABLE IDEA OF

CHRIST IS THE ARYAN CHRIST OF THE PROTO-NAZIS.

 

SO WHEN VEGETARIANISM IS USED AS A WEAPON TO 'DEFEAT' JUDAISM AND

CHRISTIANITY, LOOK CLOSELY AT THE TEACHINGS THAT ACCOMPANY THIS

APPROACH. THERE WILL BE AN ATTEMPT TO DISCREDIT AND DECONSTRUCT THE

JUDEO-CHRISTIAN SHASTRAS. THERE WILL BE CHARACTER ASSASSINATION

ATTEMPTS ON THE PROPHETS, SAINTS AND COMMON HEROS OF JUDAISM AND

CHRISTIANITY, WITH EVENTUALLY THE ENTIRE TRADITIONS BEING

DIABOLIZED. THE PRESENT LEADERS AND MAGISTERIUM OF THE CATHOLIC

CHURCH OR ORTHODOX JUDAISM WILL BE DIABOLIZED. EVENTUALLY THE 'JEWS'

AND 'CATHOLICS' WILL BE PRESENTED AS ARCH-ENEMIES OF GOD, WHO RUN A

GLOBAL CONSPIRACY TO ENSLAVE HUMANITY, FORCING US ALL TO WORSHIP

YAHWEH WHO IS THE DARK DEMIGOD OF A SOUL-LESS RACE OF CRUEL ANTI-

ARYAN BARBARIANS !

 

UNTIL WE SEVER THE THREAD IN OUR PREACHING THAT CONNECTS BETWEEN DIET

AND RACIST OCCULTISM, WHEN PEOPLE LATCH ONTO OUR DIETARY REFORM,

MANY WILL CONTINUE TO END UP IN THE CLUTCHES OF ARYANISM.

 

TO PROMOTE AHIMSA AND RELATED DIETARY REFORM AMONG JEWS AND

CHRISTIANS, WE SHOULD PURELY PRESENT THE TIME-HONORED ASCETIC

MORALITY OF TRADITIONAL JUDEO-CATHOLIC FLESH ABSTINENCE, AND THE

SCIENTIFIC ECOLOGICAL, MEDICAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC (SOCIAL

JUSTICE) REASONS FOR EATING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE 'FOOD CHAIN' INSTEAD

OF AT THE TOP AS PREDATORS.

 

WE MUST THUS DE-COUPLE THE ISSUE OF DIET FROM ALL OF ITS EASTERN

ARYANIST AND WESTERN OCCULT ASSOCIATIONS AND USES. OTHERWISE, WE

WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO HAVE A REALLY PRODUCTIVE DIALOGUE WITH

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION. AS LONG

AS OUR PREACHING IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE OCCULT RELIGION

OF 'VEGETARIANISM', WITH ALL OF ITS ANTI-JEWISH AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN

HISTORICAL BAGGAGE, OUR EFFORTS WILL CONTINUE TO ATTRACT ONLY NEW

AGERS AND OTHERS ON THE FRINGES OF THE AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CHRISTIAN

TRADITION.

 

WE MUST NOT ALLOW EITHER THE ARYANIST RACISTS OR THE REACTIONARY

CHRISTIANS TO FRAME OUR QUESTIONS AND SUPPLY OUR ANSWERS. INSTEAD WE

MUST UNDERSTAND WHAT HAS REALLY BEEN GOING ON HISTORICALLY IN THIS

STRUGGLE. FROM THE BEGINNING THERE HAS BEEN ASCETICISM IN THE JUDEO-

CATHOLIC TRADITION. ONE OF THE PRIME FEATURES OF ASCETICISM WAS

ALWAYS FLESH ABSTINENCE. HOWEVER THE NECESSARY EATING OF FLESH FOR

SURVIVAL WAS NEVER CONSIDERED A MORTAL SIN, JUST AS IT WAS NOT

CONSIDERED A MORTAL SIN IN VEDIC CULTURE. SACRIFICE FOR SIN WAS

ASSOCIATED WITH THE SAD NECESSITY OF KILLING IN SITUATIONS OF

SURVIVAL. HUNTING AND FISHING PEOPLES IN ECOSYSTEMS WHERE PLANT

LIFE CANNOT SUSTAIN HUMAN LIFE HAVE KILLED OUT OF NECESSITY. THUS

THERE WAS ALLOWANCE MADE FOR SUCH KILLING AND FLESH-EATING IN THE

BHAKTI TRADITIONS OF BOTH THE EAST AND WEST. THE ISSUE THEREFORE IS

NOT WHETHER THE EAST AND WEST WORSHIP DIFFERENT GODS, THE GOD OF

VEGETARIANISM AND THE GOD OF FLESH EATING. IT IS NOT WHETHER

VICARIOUS ATONEMENT IS VEDIC OR NOT. BECAUSE, LIKE THE JUDEO-

CATHOLIC THEOLOGY OF SACRIFICE, THE ENTIRE VEDIC SACRIFICIAL SYSTEM

IS ONE OF VICARIOUS ATONEMENT, THROUGH THE COSMIC SELF-SACRIFICE OF

LORD BALADEVA AS PURUSHA YUPA DHVAJA.

 

THE ISSUE IS OUR PERSONAL MORAL REALIZATION AND CULPABILITY FOR SIN.

THUS THE APOSTLES OF CHRIST RIGHTLY CONSIDERED DIET TO BE A

SUBSIDIARY ISSUE TO THE QUESTION OF SALVATION THROUGH THE GRACE OF

GOD. GOD CAN SAVE ANY WILLING SOUL. OF THIS THERE IS NO DOUBT, AND

THIS IS THE GOSPEL 'GOOD NEWS' THAT THE BHAKTI TRADITIONS OF DIVINE

LOVE AND GRACE SEEK TO COMMUNICATE. THIS IS A 'DOGMATIC' TRUTH AT

THE TOP OF THE HIERARCHY OF DIVINE REVELATIONS. THIS IS THE DOCTRINE

OF SALVATION. THEN THERE IS ASCETIC OR MORAL THEOLOGY, WHICH DEALS

WITH BOTH IMPEDIMENTS TO SALVATION ( MORTAL SINS) AND IMPEDIMENTS TO

CHRISTIAN PERFECTION, VENIAL SINS.

THERE ARE ISSUES OF CULPABILITY THAT MODIFY A PERSON'S RESPONSIBILITY

AND THEREFORE DEGREE OF GUILT INVOLVED IN ANY ACT OR OMISSION.

CATHOLIC AND JEWISH MORAL THEOLOGY DISTINGUISH IN GREAT DETAIL THE

ISSUES INVOLVED IN MORTAL OR VENIAL SINNING, AND IN CORPORAL AND

SPIRITUAL SINS OF COMMISSION AND OMISSION.

 

THUS IN CATHOLIC ASCETIC (ALSO CALLED 'MORAL') THEOLOGY, THERE HAVE

BEEN WHOLE LIBRARIES OF WORKS WRITTEN ON THE SEVEN DEADLY (MORTAL)

SINS, VENIAL SINS, AND THE CORPORAL AND SPIRITUAL WORKS OF MERCY OR

CHARITY. OMITTING THESE WORKS IS A SIN. SINS ARE BOTH ACTS AND

FAILURES TO ACT.

 

SRILA PRABHUPADA CHALLENGED EVERYONE TO EXAMINE THEIR OWN LIFE FOR

ITS ASCETIC MORALITY. HIS CHALLENGE WAS PERSONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL

IN SO FAR AS IT CALLED ON CHRISTIANS TO COLLECTIVELY RETURN TO THE

ASCETICISM OF THEIR EARLY (CATHOLIC) CHURCH. HOWEVER, SOME OF HIS

DISCIPLES WHO WERE 'VEGETARIANS' SAW THE MOVEMENT AS A STRUGGLE

BETWEEN OPPOSING GODS AND RACES. THE GOD OF THE MEAT EATERS AND HIS

(JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN) MELLCHAS AND YAVANAS AGAINST THE GOD OF THE

VEGETARIANS AND HIS ARYANS. THUS THEY FRAMED THE DISCOURSE IN TERMS

OF THIS STRUGGLE, AND IT BECAME NECESSARY FOR THEM TO ATTACK (SUBTLY

OR OVERTLY) THE GURU, SHASTRA AND SADHU OF THE ENTIRE CENTRIC JUDEO-

CHRISTIAN TRADITION.

 

 

FOR ALLIES IN THIS ATTACK, THEY JOINED WITH OTHER OLD AND NEWER

HISTORICAL ENEMIES OF THESE WESTERN BHAKTI TRADITIONS, SUCH AS THE

GNOSTICS, OCCULTISTS, MAYAVADI SUFI MUSLIMS,

OTHER ANTI-ABRAHAMIC HINDUS AND BUDDHISTS ETC. IN EACH CASE THEY

REINFORCED THE FOCUS OF PREACHING AWAY FROM THE GRACE OF A LOVING AND

ALL-POWERFUL (TO SAVE) GOD, ONTO MORAL THEOLOGY ISSUES LIKE DIET AND

OTHER CORPORAL SINS. GLUTTONY IS THE SIN THAT INCLUDES UNNECESSARY

FLESH EATING, AND IT CAN BE A MORTAL SIN. GLUTTONY, ILLICIT SEX,

INTOXICATION AND GAMBLING ARE ALL CORPORAL 'SINS OF THE FLESH' THAT

MAY REACH THE LEVEL OF A MORTAL SIN, WHICH IS DEFINED AS SOMETHING

UNREPENTED THAT IS SO SERIOUS THAT IT CAN SEPARATE A PERSON FROM

GOD. REVIVALS OF CHRISTIAN PIETY HAVE ALWAYS STRESSED THAT A

CHRISTIAN MUST REPENT OF AND NEVER COMMIT SUCH MORTAL OR 'DEADLY

CORPORAL SINS. BUT, CHRISTIAN ASCETICISM HAS ALSO ALWAYS COUNSELED

AGAINST LACK OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY (MERCIFUL LOVE) AND THE SPIRITUAL

SINS AS WELL ! SPIRITUAL SINS ARE THINGS LIKE PRIDE, ATHEISM,

CRUELTY, ENVY, GREED, DISHONESTY, INFIDELITY, SPIRITUAL SLOTH

LAZINESS OR LUKE-WARMNESS (THERE ARE MANY)ETC.

 

IN THE HARE KRISHNA MOVEMENT, SOME LEADERS HAVE IGNORED THE REAL

DEVELOPMENT OF SPIRITUAL VIRTUES AND HAVE EVEN TAUGHT SINFULNESS LIKE

IMPERSONAL CRUELTY TO PEOPLE, DISHONESTY, ENVY AND GREED. THUS WE

HAVE SEEN A PATHOLOGICAL EMPHASIS ON THE 'FOUR REGS' OF CORPORAL

MORALITY, WHILE THERE HAS BEEN A NEGLECT OF THE 'THINGS OF THE

SPIRIT'. THE FOCUS HAS SHIFTED AWAY FROM GOD'S GRACE AND DEVELOPING

THE INTERNAL SPIRITUAL VIRTUES, TO PREACHING GOD'S LAW AND THE

EXTERNAL SHOW OF PIETY PRODUCED BY SEEMING TO 'FOLLOW THE FOUR

REGULATIVE PRINCIPLES'.

 

NOW CONSIDER THAT SINS OF THE MERE FLESH ARE GENERALLY NOT AS

DANGEROUS TO THE SOUL AS SINS OF THE SPIRIT ! AFTER ALL WE ARE NOT

THE BODY AND WITH THE BODY ITS CORPORAL SINS ARE DESTROYED BY DEATH,

THE ULTIMATE PUNISHMENT FOR ALL CORPORAL SINS. WE ALL HAVE TO FACE

PURIFICATION FROM OUR CORPORAL SINS BY DEATH ! WE MUST REPENT OF

THESE TO ENTER THE NEXT WORLD UNATTACHED TO THEM, AND FREE OF THEIR

EFFECTS. HOWEVER, THE SUBTLER 'SPIRITUAL' SINS OF THE SELF ARE WHAT

WE MUST ALSO STAND BEFORE OUR MAKER AND OUR JUDGE WITH. THESE HAVE

NOT BEEN DESTROYED BY THE DEATH OF OUR FLESH. SINS OF THE FLESH ARE

PUNISHED IN THE FLESH. SINS OF THE SUBTLER SELF, AGAINST GOD AND

OTHERS, ARE NOT PUNISHABLE IN THE FLESH. THESE, IF THEY ARE 'MORTAL'

SEPARATE A PERSON FROM THE COMMUNION OF LOVE WITH GOD AND OTHERS.

THE VAISHNAVA SHASTRAS ALSO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN GROSS AND SUBTLE

SINS, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE 'PUNISHMENTS' OR KARMIC REACTIONS.

 

SO NOW LET US CONSIDER THE STATE OF 'SALVATION' OF THE PERSON WHO IS

A PERFECT 'FOLLOWER OF THE FOUR REGULATIVE PRINCIPLES' OF ASCETICISM,

BUT WHO IS GUILTY OF AN UNREPENTED MORTAL SIN OF PRIDE. SUCH A

PERSON MAY BE EXTERNALLY HOLY, BUT INWARDLY EVIL AND DESTINED FOR

THE 'DAMNATION' OF SEPARATION FROM GOD. IN FACT, ANYONE IN A STATE

OF 'MORTAL SIN' HAS ALREADY SEPARATED THEMSELF FROM GOD AND THE

COMMUNION OF HIS BELOVED. THE INTERCESSORY PRAYER AND SACRIFICIAL

ACTS OF OTHERS, FINAL REPENTANCE AND SALVATION BY GOD'S GRACE ARE THE

ONLY HOPE OF SUCH AS SOUL. THUS THE APOSTLES RIGHTLY TAUGHT THAT

MORTAL SINS OF THE SOUL ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN VENIAL SINS OF THE

FLESH, WHICH WHEN CONFESSED AND TRULY REPENTED, ARE PUNISHED IN THE

BODY, FINISHED AT DEATH, AND HAVE NO POWER TO SEPARATE ONE FROM GOD

IN THE NEXT WORLD.

 

THE STUDY OF GLUTTONY AND UNNECESSARY CRUELTY IN OUR DIET AND OTHER

ISSUES OF CARNAL AND SPIRITUAL SIN, LIKE SEXUAL SIN OR PRIDE, ARE

PART OF THE ASCETIC OR 'MORAL' THEOLOGY OF OUR JUDEO-CHRISTIAN

TRADITION. THE APOSTOLIC (CATHOLIC) CHURCH HAS ALWAYS TAUGHT

ASCETIC OR MORAL THEOLOGY ALONG WITH DOGMATIC THEOLOGY. THUS THERE

IS A VAST REPOSITORY OF JUDEO-CATHOLIC GURU, SHASTRA AND SADHU WISDOM

ON THE ISSUES OF CORPORAL AND SPIRITUAL SIN, SINS OF COMMISSION AND

OMISSION, PERSONAL AND COLLECTIVE CULPABILITY, CONFESSION AND

PENITENCE, ETC. I CONTRIBUTED A CHAPTER ON FLESH ABSTINENCE AND

CATHOLIC ASCETIC THEOLOGY, TO THE BOOK "EMBRACING EARTH, CATHOLIC

APPROACHES TO ECOLOGY".

 

ONLY BECAUSE OF A LACK OF GOOD CATHOLIC EDUCATION, CAN CHRISTIANS BE

CONFUSED OVER SUCH LOADED QUESTIONS AS THOSE FRAMED BY THE GNOSTICS,

NEW AGERS AND OTHERS. FLESH EATING CAN BE A MORTAL SIN, A VENIAL SIN

OR NO SIN AT ALL, DEPENDING ON THE CULPABILITY OF THE PERSON INVOLVED

AND THE TIME AND CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE ACT. WHEN A SAINT APPEARS AND

CALLS US TO REVIVAL, EXHORTING US TO HOLINESS, S/HE ALWAYS PROMOTES

PIETY OR ASCETICISM, TO THE DEGREE THAT IS NEEDED AND POSSIBLE

ACCORDING TO THE TIME AND CIRCUMSTANCE. IN THIS CRUEL AND VIOLENT

AGE, SRILA PRABHUPADA EXHORTED HUMANITY TO TURN AWAY FROM

UNNECESSARY VIOLENCE, TOWARD AHIMSA, AND HE FOCUSED ON PROMOTING

FLESH ABSTINENCE AS THE PRIMARY MEANS TO THIS END. HE DID NOT COME

TO PROMOTE THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF THE RACIST ARYANIST MAYAVADIS'

CONCOCTED ARYAN CHRIST. HE CAME TO PREACH THE GOSPEL OF SRI

KRISHNA'S GRACE, MEDIATED THROUGH THE INTERCESSION OF OUR LADY ROSA

MYSTICA / RADHA, AND LORD BALADEVA THE SAVIOR OF ALL WORLDS.

 

 

THIS MESSAGE OF SALVATION THROUGH GRACE SHOULD BE THE PRIMARY FOCUS

OF OUR PREACHING, AND ASCETICISM AND ABSTINENCE SHOULD BE PREACHED

ONLY IN THE PROPER CONTEXT OF THIS ALL-IMPORTANT MESSAGE OF GOD'S

LOVE AND MERCY.

 

WHEN DID THE KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS MOVEMENT BECOME A VEHICLE FOR THE

ARAYANIST HATE JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY MOVEMENT? WHEN, FOR SOME

DEVOTEES, DID THE RELIGION OF ARYAN OCCULT 'VEGETARIANISM' ECLIPSE

THE MESSAGE OF SRI SRI KRISHNA-BALARAMA'S AND MOTHER RADHARANI'S

GRACE? WHEN, FOR SOME DEVOTEES, DID THE NON-SECTARIAN SANKIRTAN

MISSION OF SRI SRI GAURA-NITYANANDA-RAMA BECOME A FANATICAL SECTARIAN

ELITISM OF SELF-APPOINTED ARYAN SUPERMEN?

 

LET US CLEARLY UNDERSTAND THAT THE PURE MISSION OF OUR ACARYAS HAS

BEEN COMPROMISED AND NEARLY RUINED BY THE PERNICIOUSLY IMPERSONAL

INFLUENCES OF OCCULT ARYANISM, AND THAT THIS ARYANISM CYNICALLY

USES 'VEGETARIANISM' AND THE 'FOUR REGS' TO EXTERNALLY PROMOTE ITSELF

AS A 'HOLIER THAN THOU' TRADITION IN OPPOSITION TO JUDAISM AND

CHRISTIANITY, WHICH IT FALSELY PRESENTS AS FUNDAMENTALLY DIABOLIC, OR

AT LEAST PROFOUNDLY CORRUPTED. TO RETURN TO PREACHING THE PURE

MESSAGE OF OUR VAISHNAVA TRADITION OF DIVINE GRACE AND SATTVIC

MORALITY, WE MUST DISENTANGLE OURSELVES FROM THE INFLUENCES OF ANTI-

JEWISH AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN OCCULT ARYANISM. PURITY IS POTENCY.

POLLUTING PURE VAISHNAVISM WITH WESTERN CONCEPTS OF WHITE RACIST

ARYANISM, ANTI-SEMITISM, ANTI-CHRISTIANITY, OCCULT IMPERSONALISM AND

VOIDISM IS AN ABOMINATION. IT IS A DANGER TO SOULS AND DESTRUCTIVE

TO HUMAN UNDERSTANDING, RESPECT AND HARMONY. IT IS EXTREMELY

COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE TO THE NON-SECTARIAN MISSION OF SRI SRI GURU AND

GAURANGA, AND SUCH POLLUTION SHOULD BE AVOIDED AT ALL COSTS.

 

CAN MEAT EATERS BE SAVED? PART TWO: SIN AND ITS EFFECT IN THE

CONSIDERATIONS OF JUDEO- CHRISTIAN ASCETICISM AND MORAL THEOLOGY

 

ANOTHE DEVOTEE RESPONDED TO MY FIRST LETTER AND ASKED A VERY GOOD

QUESTION:

 

"I FOUND THIS ARTICLE VERY VALUABLE. HOWEVER, I FOUND ONE THING

CONFUSING, AND WOULD APPRECIATE CLARIFICATION IF YOUR TIME AND ENERGY

PERMIT. YOU STATED THAT SINS OF THE FLESH (E.G., ILLICIT SEX) ARE

PUNISHED BY THE DEATH OF THE BODY AND THEREAFTER DO NOT SEPARATE THE

SOUL FROM GOD. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THOUGH THAT SUCH ACTS CREATE

SAMSKARAS WHICH CONTINUE TO BURDEN THE SOUL AFTER DEATH AND AFFECT

FUTURE LIVES. IS MY UNDERSTANDING INCORRECT, OR HAVE I

MISINTERPRETED YOUR POINT?"

 

 

HARI BOL!

 

EXCELLENT QUESTION PRABHUJI!

 

THE EFFECT OF ANY SIN IS RELATIVE TO ITS SEVERITY, THE PERSONAL

INTERNAL CULPABILITY OF THE SINNER, AND THE EXTENUATING TIME AND

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE SINFUL ACT OR OMISSION. THUS WHAT IS NORMALLY A

VENIAL SIN, MAY BECOME MORE SERIOUS AND EVEN CONSTITUTE A MORTAL

SIN. CONVERSELY, AN ACT OR OMISSION THAT WOULD NORMALLY BE A MORTAL

SIN, MAY BECOME A VENIAL SIN OR NO SIN AT ALL, DEPENDING ON THE ABOVE

QUALIFYING REALITIES. FOR EXAMPLE, TO KILL A HUMAN BEING IS A

NORMALLY A MORTAL SIN, BUT THERE ARE SOME CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT

IS NOT A SIN, BUT MAY EVEN BE CONSIDERED A DHARMIC DUTY, IN WHICH

CASE IT WOULD BE A SIN TO FAIL TO ACT, BY SUCH DHARMIC KILLING. IF I

SAW A SUICIDE BOMBER ABOUT TO BLOW UP A GROUP OF INNOCENT PEOPLE, AND

I COULD STOP IT WITH LETHAL FORCE, BUT DIDN'T, IT WOULD BE A SIN FOR

ME TO FAIL TO ACT AND STOP THE SLAUGHTER OF MANY, EVEN THOUGH I WOULD

BE ABETTING THE SINFUL SUICIDE OF ONE. SO THE QUESTION REGARDING

ANY OF OUR ACTS OR OMISSIONS IS 'WHAT IS OUR PERSONAL DEGREE OF

RESPONSIBILITY IN EACH SITUATION'. ONE CAN NOT SIMPLY GENERALLY AND

IMPERSONALLY CITE SOME LAW AND IGNORE EVERY OTHER PERSONAL AND

SPECIFIC ASPECT OF THE SITUATION. THERE ARE MORAL ABSOLUTES, BUT

INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL REALITIES MODIFY OUR RESPONSE-ABILITY REGARDING

SUCH ABSOLUTES. SOMETIMES OUR ONLY CHOICE IS BETWEEN THE LESSER OF

TWO OR MORE EVILS.

 

WHETHER ONE BELIEVES IN MATERIAL REINCARNATION AFTER THE DEATH OF

THIS BODY OR NOT, THE DISTINCTION IN APOSTOLIC (CATHOLIC) DOCTRINE IS

THAT A MORTAL ('DEADLY') SIN AFFECTIVELY SEPARATES ONE FROM GOD AND

THE 'REDEEMED' AND UNFALLEN COMMUNITY OF CREATION. IN A 'STATE OF

MORTAL SIN' ONE HAS BY THEIR OWN FREE-WILL ISOLATED THEMSELF FROM THE

GOD WHO-IS-LOVE AND THE LOVE OF GOD AND OTHERS. BY THEIR

COMPASSIONLESS OFFENCE THE SINNER HAS CUT-THEMSELF-OFF. THINK OF THE

VAISHNAVA STORY IN WHICH GOD HIDES FROM THE SINNER IN THE SINNER'S

OWN HEART ! THIS DAMNATION OF SEPARATION IS NOT A PUNISHMENT FROM

GOD, IT IS ENTIRELY THE SINNER'S OWN DOING. THE SINFUL ACT OR

OMISSION OR ATTITUDE REQUIRED THEM TO SELFISHLY SEPARATE FROM OTHERS,

AND AS LONG AS THEY REMAIN UNREPENTANT OF THE SEPARATING SIN, THEY

WILL CONTINUE TO BE SEPARATED, ISOLATED OR DAMNED. HOWEVER, WHILE A

VENIAL SIN OFFENDS GOD AND OTHERS, IT IS NOT RELATIONSHIP-ENDING. IT

HURTS BUT DOES NOT UTTERLY DESTROY / SEVER ONE'S RELATIONSHIP WITH

GOD. GOD CANNOT JUST OVERLOOK IT, BUT HE WILL NOT DAMN SOMEONE

AND 'CAST THEM OUT FROM HIS PRESENCE' FOR IT EITHER. SIN IN SIN, BUT

THERE ARE DEGREES OF SIN. IN FACT THE MEASURE OF 'SIN' WAS

ORIGINALLY PROBABLY AN ARCHERY TERM, THAT DISCRIBED THE DEGREE OF

DISTANCE BETWEEN THE TARGET AND THE FAILED EFFORT TO HIT IT. WE SEE

THIS FAILING-TO-HIT-THE-TARGET MEANING IN THE STATEMENT THAT "ALL

HAVE SINNED AND FALLEN SHORT OF THE GLORY OF GOD".

 

THE ISSUES OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, CULPABILITY FOR SIN, AND THE

SERIOUSNESS OF SIN

 

BOTH THE VAISHNAVA AND JUDEO-CATHOLIC TRADITIONS TEACH THAT OUR

ESSENTIAL NATURE IS SPIRITUAL AND THAT WE ARE SOMEHOW 'FALLEN' HERE.

THESE TRADITIONS TEACH THAT IN BEATITUDE WE HAVE A 'SPIRITUAL BODY',

AND THAT TO ATTAIN THAT STATE IN THE FRIENDSHIP OR PRESENCE OF GOD,

WE MUST BE DIVINELY GRACED TO BECOME PURIFIED OF OUR PRESENT SINFUL

STATE. IN VAISHNAVISM IT IS ASSUMED THAT WE ENTER LIFE AS NEWBORNS

IN SOME KIND OF A STATE OF SIN DUE TO PAST-LIFE SAMSKARAS. IN

CATHOLICISM THE ASSUMPTION IS ALSO THAT THE NEWBORN IS BORN WITH THE

EFFECT OF SIN ON ITS SOUL. HOWEVER IN CATHOLICISM, NO ASSUMPTION OF

A PREVIOUS-LIFE PERSONAL SIN IS MADE. INSTEAD, IT IS THE "ORIGINAL

SIN" OF THE JIVA / EVE (H'EVA IN HEBREW IS EXACTLY THE SAME WORD AS

JIVA IN SANSKRIT) THAT CAUSED THE SOUL'S INITIAL SEPARATION FROM GOD,

WHICH IS ADDRESSED IN CATHOLIC TEACHINGS. TO GAIN GOD'S GRACE (BY

THE INTERCESSION OF THE FAITHFUL) FOR THE REMOVAL OF THIS ORIGINAL

EFFECT OF SIN ON THE SOUL, CATHOLICS PRACTICE INFANT BAPTISM. SUCH

INFANT BAPTISM IS REVEALED TO RELIEVE THE PERSON OF THE SINFULNESS

THAT THEY HAVE BEEN BORN INTO LIFE WITH. ALTHOUGH IT CLEANS THE

SLATE FOR A NEW LIFE IN GOD, IT DOES NOT PREVENT SOMEONE FROM SINNING

AGAIN.

 

THE BLESSING OF BAPTISM CANNOT PROTECT ONE FROM THE JUDGMENT FOR

PERSONAL SIN COMMITTED AFTERWARDS. THUS WHEN THE SOUL REACHES THE

AGE OF REASON, THEY ARE TAUGHT WHAT SIN IS, THAT THEY MUST TRY NOT TO

SIN, AND IF THEY FAIL, THEY MUST CONFESS AND REPENT OF THEIR SIN TO

BE FORGIVEN, AND RETURNED TO A STATE OF GRACE. IT IS SIN THAT

ALIENATES US FROM GOD AND OTHERS, AND IT IS 'PERFECT CONTRITION' OR

PERFECT OTHER-CENTERED COMPASSIONATE SORROW THAT CEASES OUR

ALIENATION, WHEN WE ARE FORGIVEN THROUGH GOD'S GRACE. NOT ALL SINS

ARE EQUALLY SERIOUS AND ALIENATING. FOR EXAMPLE THERE IS A

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CARELESSLY BREAKING SOMETHING AND DESTROYING

THINGS PURPOSELY THROUGH VIOLENT ACTS OF VANDALISM. IF A STARVING

PERSON 'SHOP-LIFTS' A PIECE OF FRUIT IT IS NOT THE SAME AS A GREEDY

THEIVING CORPORATE EXECUTIVE CALLOUSLY DESTROYING THE LIVES OF

MILLIONS. A LIE TOLD TO PREVENT A GREATER EVIL IS STILL A LIE, BUT

MAY NOT BE A MORTAL SIN. SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE IS NOT THE SAME AS THE

MORTAL SIN OF ADULTERY, BUT BOTH ARE THE SAME PHYSICAL ACT. ONE MAY

HAVE SOME INTOXICATION FROM A NECESSARY MEDICINE, BUT THAT IS NOT THE

SAME AS PURPOSELY TRYING TO GET DRUNK. A PERSON WHO EATS A LITTLE

BIT TOO MUCH IS NOT THE SAME AS SOMEONE WHO MURDERS THEIR PRECIOUS

HUMAN BODY WITH FOOD. ONE WAY WE SEE THAT VEDIC CULTURE ADDRESSED

THE ISSUE OF VARYING DEGREES OF SIN, WAS BY A SCALE OF FINES AND

PROGRESSIVE PENALTIES FOR REPEATED OFFENCES, AND DIFFERENT PENALITIES

FOR THOSE IN DIFFERENT VARNAS AND ASHRAMS.

 

NOW THE DISTINCTION IS THAT THERE IS ALSO A DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN 'SPIRITUAL' SINS (LIKE PRIDE, HATE, GREED, DISHONESTY ETC. )

AND CORPORAL SINS OF THE FLESH, SUCH AS SLOTH, SEXUAL SINS, GLUTTONY,

INTOXICATION ETC., WHICH HAVE TO DO WITH THINGS LIKE PHYSICAL

IMMATURITY AND LACK OF PHYSICAL DISCIPLINE, A STRONG SEX DRIVE, A

WEAK WILL, POOR EDUCATION OR ENCULTURATION (CULTURAL DEPRIVATION) AND

NOT HAVING A RELIGIOUSLY WELL-FORMED CONSCIENCE ETC. THUS THE SOUL'S

CULPABILITY FOR MANY CORPORAL SINS IS GREATLY MODIFIED BY AGE, MENTAL

ABILITY, HEALTH, SOCIAL FACTORS, A CRISIS OR COMPELLING CIRCUMSTANCES

BEYOND THE PERSON'S CONTROL. TRADITIONAL MORAL THEOLOGIES (NOT JUST

CATHOLIC) HAVE TAKEN SUCH FACTORS INTO ACCOUNT. THUS SECULAR LAW IN

EVERY NATION REFLECTS THIS IN THE FACT THAT CHILDREN ARE NEVER

CONSIDERED PUNISHABLE IN THE SAME WAY AS ADULTS ARE FOR SOME OF THE

SAME ACTS. THERE IS A PERVASIVE CONCEPT OF 'THE AGE OF REASON' THAT

PROTECTS CHILDREN AND THOSE WHO CANNOT REASON FROM BEING HELD TO THE

NORMAL ADULT REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW. IF OFTEN UNREASONABLE HUMANS

CAN APPRECIATE THE CONCEPT OF MODIFIED CULPABILITY, WHAT ABOUT GOD?

IS GOD LESS JUST THAN MAN? OF COURSE NOT, SO WE CAN APPRECIATE THAT

THE SAME ACT MAY BE SEVERELY 'JUDGED' BY GOD FOR ONE PERSON, AND NOT

CONSIDERED EVEN PROSECUTABLE FOR ANOTHER. GOD IS JUST. WHERE VOWS

ARE CONCERNED, GOD IS MOST STRICT. THUS 'RELIGIOUS' UNDER VOWS ARE,

BY THEIR OWN DEVOTED FREE WILL, HELD BY GOD TO A DIFFERENT STANDARD

THAN OTHER SOULS. GOD RECIPROCATES PERFECTLY WITH US. A JUST AND

MERCIFUL JUDGE, HE IS THE MOST LIBERAL TO THOSE WHO MOST NEED

LIBERALITY, AND THE MOST STRICT TO THOSE WHO DESIRE AND REQUIRE HIM

TO BE STRICT. "JUDGE NOT LEST YOU BE JUDGED, FOR IN AS MUCH AS YOU

HAVE JUDGED, YOU WILL BE JUDGED". THE PRINCIPLE IS CLEAR. IN GOD

THE REDEEMER, PERFECT JUSTICE AND MERCY MEET AND ARE RECONCILED.

 

IN CATHOLIC TEACHING, IF A PERSON 'DIES' IN THE GRACE OF GOD,

BUT 'HAS VENIAL SINS' (ATTACHMENT TO NON-MORTAL SINS ) 'ON THEIR

SOUL', AFTER DEATH THEY PASS THROUGH THE PURIFICATION PROCESS CALLED

THE STATE OF PURGATORY. THIS CLEANSES THEM OF THEIR MINOR SINFUL

ATTACHMENTS, SO THAT THEY CAN ENTER THE BEATIFIC STATE IN HEAVEN OR

PARADISE. THE CHURCH HAS NEVER DEFINED WHERE PURGATORY IS, BUT SOME

SAINTS HAVE SEEN SOULS IN PURGATION APPEARING AS MORTALS ON EARTH.

THE HISTORY OF THE DOCTRINE OF PURGATORY IS AMAZING, AND CLEARLY

RELATED TO THE JEWISH, PLATONIC AND EASTERN TRADITIONS OF

REINCARNATION FOR PURIFICATION. THE DIFFERENCE IN CATHOLIC TEACHING

IS THAT ONCE A SOUL IS IN THE STATE OF PURGATION, THEY HAVE ALREADY

BEEN GUARANTEED SALVATION. DUE TO THEIR SINCERE SURRENDER AND

RECONCILIATION TO GOD, THEY ARE IN FACT SAVED, AND CANNOT EVEN SIN

ANY MORE. STILL THEY HAVE THE RESIDUAL EFFECTS OF THEIR ATTACHMENT

TO NON-MORTAL SINS TO DEAL WITH, AND SO MUST SERVE THEIR TIME IN

GOD'S COSMIC REHABILITATION CENTER, TO GET 'CLEAN AND SOBER' BEFORE

GOING BACK TO HOME, BACK TO GODHEAD.

 

SO DOES IT MATTER MORE WHERE WE BELIEVE 'PURGATORY' TO BE, OR THAT WE

BELIEVE IN THE ABILITY OF GOD'S GRACE TO REDEEM AND FINALLY PURIFY

US? IN EITHER CASE, ALL THAT IS REQUIRED OF US IS OUR CONSENT AND

COOPERATION WITH GOD'S GRACE, IN HIS SECOND PERSON BALA-JESU, AS THE

INTERCESSOR AND REDEEMER OF ALL 'FALLEN' SOULS.

'SAMSKARAS' MAY BE UNDERSTOOD AS EFFECTING US AFTER DEATH IN ANOTHER

MATERIAL LIFE, OR IN SOME OTHER STATE OR FORM IDENTIFIED BY CATHOLIC

TRADITION AS PURGATION. HOWEVER, THE FACT THAT WE ARE IN PURGATION

MEANS THAT WE ARE HEADED FOR HEAVEN EVENTUALLY. OTHERWISE AFTER

DEATH WE WOULD BE CONSIGNED TO ETERNAL SEPARATION FOR AN INVINCIBLE

ATTACHMENT TO MORTAL SIN. THUS IT IS SAID THAT SOULS SUFFERING

PURGATION (WHO REALIZE THEIR STATE) KNOW A JOY UNSURPASSED AMONG

THE 'LIVING' WHO HAVE NOT YET MET THEIR 'FINAL JUDGEMENT'. SOULS 'IN

PURGATORY' MAY KNOW THIS JOY, BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT THEY ARE ON

THEIR WAY BACK HOME ! THE LIVING WHO HAVE YET TO FACE THEIR KRIMA /

KARMA (GOD'S JUDGEMENT = KRIMA), DO NOT KNOW IF THEY WILL HAVE

THE 'FINAL PERSEVERANCE' TO BE FULLY SURRENDERED AT THE TIME OF

DEATH. THUS EVEN MANY GREAT SAINTS HAVE, IN GENUINE HUMILITY,

DOUBTED THEIR SALVATION, REALIZING THAT THEY TOO COULD FALL INTO SOME

SERIOUS SIN THAT WOULD SEPARATE THEM FROM GOD. THINKING THAT WE

ARE SAVED AND CANNOT SIN ANY MORE, WHILE STILL LIVING IN THIS WORLD,

IS CALLED THE SIN OF PRESUMPTION. IT IS RELATED TO THE SIN OF

PRIDE. RELIGIOUS HISTORY IS LITTERED WITH THE TRAGIC HUMAN WRECKAGE

OF THE LIVES OF ASTOUNDINGLY GIFTED PERSONS, WHO FELL FROM THE

HEIGHTS OF RELIGIOSITY AND SPIRITUAL POWER, BECAUSE THEY BECAME SURE

OF THEIR SALVATION 'NO MATTER WHAT', AND SUCCUMBING TO 'SPIRITUAL

PRIDE', COMMITTED SOME GRAVE (MORTAL) SIN. WE HAVE SEEN THIS

TRAGEDY IN OUR OWN TIME. OH HOW TRAGICALLY THE MIGHTY HAVE FALLEN IN

ISKCON, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND OTHER RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS !

 

AT ANY TIME WE CAN FACE OUR 'FINAL JUDGEMENT'. THIS IS DIFFERENT

THAN THE MOMENT-TO-MOMENT KRIMA / KARMIC REACTIONS THAT WE FACE ALL

OF THE TIME. THIS IS WHY THERE IS SUCH AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF

EMPHASIS ON PREPARATION FOR THE MOMENT OF DEATH IN BOTH THE JUDEO-

CATHOLIC AND VAISHNAVA TRADITIONS. CATHOLICS DESIRE TO MAKE A LAST

CONFESSION TO BE SURE THAT THEY FACE THEIR LORD FULLY SURRENDERED AND

WITHOUT ANY PROUD ATTACHMENT TO THEIR SINS. SO LET US REMEMBER THIS

AND PRACTICE THE PRESENCE OF GOD AT EVERY MOMENT. LET NOTHING

ALIENATE US FROM HIS LOVE, INCLUDING A RESISTANCE TO HIS MERCY! NO

ONE EARNS SALVATION, BUT ANYONE MAY REJECT IT. ALL JIVAS WHO

HAVE 'FALLEN' HERE HAVE "SINNED AND FALLEN SHORT OF THE GLORY OF

GOD". WE JIVAS HAVE ALL COMMITTED VENIAL SINS OF SOME KIND, WHETHER

OUR MINOR SINS HAVE BEEN 'SPIRITUAL' OR CORPORAL, SINS OF COMMISSION

OR OMISSION. LET US NOT REMAIN ATTACHED TO OUR SINS, SO THAT GOD

CAN GIVE US AN UNRESEVERED WELCOME BACK HOME, AS SOON AS WE LEAVE

THIS LIFE!

 

AS FAR AS THE EXTENT OF OUR CULPABILITY FOR OUR SINS IS CONCERNED,

GOD ALONE IS THE FINAL JUDGE OF THAT. A VENIAL SIN FOR ONE PERSON

MAY BE A MORTAL SIN FOR ANOTHER. THUS WE SHOULD ALWAYS REMEMBER

TO "JUDGE NOT, LEST WE BE JUDGED".

 

WISHING EVERYONE PEACE AND LOVE,

 

BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI