Guest guest Posted November 15, 2003 Report Share Posted November 15, 2003 >---~-> > >There is 1 message in this issue. > >Topics in this digest: > > 1. "pseudo" Time-Travel > "stealthskaters" <stealthskaters > > >______________________ >______________________ > >Message: 1 > Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:16:27 -0000 > "stealthskaters" <stealthskaters >"pseudo" Time-Travel > >TWO subjects here: (A) the "Russian Roswell" and (B) Backward Time- >Travel along a previously-established history path. > >(A) The 1986 crash-retrieval of a small sphere in Hill 611 >overlooking Dalnegorsk, Siberia has been characterized as >the "Russian Roswell". I first became aware of it from a video >segment by reporter George Knapp who hitched a ride on a military >helicopter from the naval base at Vladivostok to investigate the >rumors first-hand. > >You can view this using RealPlayer at >http://www.geocities.com/UFO_Videos . If the bandwidth at that site >has been temporarily exceeded for the day, you can download a zipped >copy (in either RP or WindowsMediaPlayer format) at >http://www.stealthskater.com/Videos.htm#Dalnegorsk and then proceed >to unzip it. In addition, several articles have been archived as a >single MS-Word document at >http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Dalnegorsk_01.doc . > >Two seemingly "minor" points in these reports impressed me. One was >the indication of "parent" UFOs searching for the missing probe using >searchlights that illuminated the ground but no beam or point-of- >origin could be seen for these "lights". In other words, witnesses >saw parts of the hillside being illuminated but could not tell how >the light was being propagated. If I let loose my imagination, it >would appear that "they" were able to "force" some electromagnetic >effect at a distance … in this case causing a target surface to be >illuminated (passively) or radiate (actively). Perhaps similar to >what some propellant-less designs propose by using the nuclear color >force to project a black-hole type distortion in front of the craft >acting like a "tractor beam" in reverse (e.g., see >http://www.stealthskater.com/UFO.htm#Lazar and >http://www.stealthskater.com/UNITEL_background.htm ). (Military >helicopters release free-falling objects which are radiated by black- >body radiation emitted from the helicopter as a form of >countermeasure against IR-missiles, so this would be another example >of action-at-a-distance without a perceptible source.) > >The other oddity was the disappearance of detected elements in a >subsequent chemical analysis. They were noted in a previous analysis >but weren't found later on. I'm sure that Russian professors are >quite expert at their jobs. And it's not a matter of nuclear >transmutation or chemical reaction (oh … if it were that simple!). >What could cause that? "Pyscho-reactive" materials (item 'E' at >http://www.stealthskater.com/UFO.htm )? Microwave-range amplifiers >from the Roswell craft that have a secondary effect of decomposing >substances into their elemental constituents >(http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Swartz_1.doc )? Treading on >dangerous ground here, the ultra-ultra-pure gold strands in gauze- >like fabric reminded me of the ORMEs/ORMUS stuff >(http://www.stealthskater.com/ORMEs.htm ) . Again, I'm sure the >Soviet lab institutes have already covered all of the obvious and not- >so-obvious potential reasons … yet it still remains a mystery (at >least to the general public). > > >(B) The fabled Philadelphia Experiment has had many different >accounts over-the-years. If you are a believer, the most common >version is that it initially involved tests that would make a warship >radar-invisible. Many of the naval authorities I contacted said that >radar detection of ships is not that important compared to other >means. Nowadays, for example, British military satellites can tell >the class of ship by analyzing its wake "signatures" (reminds me of a >passive "AWACS"/"Hawkeye"). > >There is another version was first revealed to me in Chica Bruce's >book 'The Philadelphia Experiment Murder' >(http://www.chica.bruce.net/ ). Nikola Tesla supposedly discovered >that applications of certain fields would cause an object to move >backwards over the path it had just taken on his test bench. So it's >not "pure" time-travel or anywhere-teleportation of the type that >usually comes to our mind. More of a "pseudo" time-travel. > >During the War, the Allieds were losing a lot of ships to mines that >weren't detected until it was too late. This account suggests that >the field-generating equipment on Tesla's workbench was massively >scaled-up to fit on a minesweeper -- not a "decoy" destroyer like the >Eldridge -- to allow it to go "back in time" over its established >path and make course adjustments to avoid the mines. Details can be >seen at http://www.stealthskater.com/PX.htm#Chica . (note: her book >is inexpensive and its investigative reports appear solid.) > >Something similar was echoed in a recent KeelyNet post >(http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m14762.html -or- [MS-Word] >http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/PX_02.doc . > >And former ELINT Sgt. Dan Sherman of "Project Preserve Destiny" fame >said his ET contacts indicated they "manipulated" time rather than >confronted it head-on. I can't figure it out … maybe you can => >http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Sherman_1.doc . (Sherman's >complete story is at http://www.stealthskater.com/Sherman.htm ). > >Sherman's stuff may not relate at all to what the former 2 references >did. Indeed, one of the major stumbling blocks to ANY of these far- >out claims is that none of them agree 100% with the any other. So >either you have many, many different UFOs, time machines, and >Stargates operating by different species using different >methodologies … OR only a few (or one) are 'correct' … OR it's all a >maze of elaborate disinformation. > >Tom Mahood always reminded me of two sobering thoughts: (1) if >something sounds too good to be true, then it usually is; and (2) >extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof! (The latter >applies to physics as well as to folklore. "Proof" means >reproducible events in the laboratory … not in curve-fitting models >or "eyewitness accounts". Else it's just ink on paper.) > > > > >______________________ >______________________ > > > >Your use of is subject to > >[/color] _______________ MSN Messenger with backgrounds, emoticons and more. http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_customize Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.