Guest guest Posted March 25, 2005 Report Share Posted March 25, 2005 'Stalin had hidden Netaji in Russia' By Udayan Namboodiri in New Delhi Friday, 25 March , 2005, 08:17 The final report of the Mukherjee Commission, which will be out early May, will provide strong evidence that Subhash lived for a considerable length of time in Soviet Russia. Whether or not the UPA Government and its Communist backers give the MK Mukherjee Commission its legitimate extension to enable it to pursue its inquiry into the last days of Netaji, the final report of the Commission, which The Pioneer learns will be out early May, will provide strong evidence that the great leader lived for a considerable length in time in Soviet Russia. Editor's Choice 'Netaji burnt to death after crash' Hearing of Netaji panel concludes The Taihoku airport "crash" was concocted to give him the much-needed cover. "The post-August 18,1945 whereabouts of Netaji are to be found in the archives of the KGB and private papers of Joseph Stalin. All that the Government of India needs to do is to request the Russian Government to make these available so that the mystery about his eventual destiny is cleared", a Commission source said. Anuj Dhar, author of a recently published definitive book on the subject, Back from Dead (Manas, Rs 495), is certain that not only was Netaji hidden in Russia by Stalin, but also treated well. The Mukherjee Commission benefited a lot from Dhar's hard work. The writer had persuaded the Taiwanese Government to officially admit that the Taihoku air crash of August 18, 1945, never happened. When Justice Mukherjee went to Taiwan in January, the host Government reiterated this position. The Mukherjee Commission also received depositions from a large number of persons who stated on record as having learnt of Netaji's stay in the former USSR from sources who had actually seen him there. The most sensational disclosure was made by Ardhendu Sarkar, a mechanical engineer employed by the Ranchi-based public sector firm, Heavy Engineering Corporation. He told the Commission that in 1962, while on deputation at the Gorlovka Machine Building Plant near Donetsk in Ukraine, he had met a German called Zerovin. Zerovin had been taken to the USSR in 1947-48 and had spent some time at a gulag in Siberia for "indoctrination". There, one day in 1948 (Zerovin told Sarkar), he had met Netaji and had actually exchanged a few words with him in German. After hearing of this, an excited Sarkar went to the Indian Embassy in Moscow and reported the matter to an Indian diplomat. What shocked Sarkar (as he recounted in his deposition) was the officer's reaction. "Why have you come to this country? Does your assignment include poking your nose in politics? Don't discuss this information with anyone. Just do what you have been sent for," the bureaucrat had snapped back. Within days, Sarkar was hounded out of the USSR. Shaken to the bones, he never spoke about the incident for 38 years before deciding to break his silence on September 28, 2000. Another important deposition was made by Rai Singh, a retired diplomat. This man reported to the Commission what he had learnt from Ram Rahul, a well-known Tibetologist with New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University. Now, Rahul had an old friendship with Babajan Gouffrav. This Gouffrav was an aide of Stalin and had headed Moscow's Institute of Oriental Studies. The "Boss", as Stalin was known, valued Gouffrav for his knowledge of India, China and Tibet. In July 2000, while on his deathbed, Rahul had told Rai two things: First, his friend Gouffrav had told him in as many words that Netaji had crossed over into the Soviet Union in 1945 via Manchuria. Stalin had detained him in a labour camp in Siberia. The second part of Rai's deposition was more surprising. He said that Rahul had been told by Gouffrav that "the Indian Ambassador" (he did not specify whether it was Vijayalakshmi Pandit, the sister of the first Indian prime minister and the first Indian envoy to the USSR, or her successor the post, Servapalli Radhakrishnan, who later went on to be President of India) had been permitted by Stalin to have a glimpse of Netaji on the condition that there would be no exchange of words with him. Incidentally, Radhakrishnan was the last man ever to meet Stalin before his own strange death in 1953. Incidentally, neither Pandit nor Radhakrishnan deposed before the sham GD Khosla Commission which gave a command performance of a report in the early 1970s. Dhar, in his book has hinted that both these eminent personalities had given enough hints in their actions that they knew some secret that could have terrible consequences on the career of the Nehru-Gandhis. On one occasion, in 1949, Pandit had blurted out at a meeting in Delhi (where her famous brother was present) that she had "something sensational" to announce. Whether it was about her meeting with Netaji or not was never known because in the next instant, Nehru tugged at her arm and asked her to stop. "When you consider the conditions under which Radhakrishnan was made President, the plot thickens. It is likely that he was rewarded for his silence by Nehru who feared political eclipse if Netaji returned to India," Dhar says. Significantly, neither Russia nor its predecessor, the USSR, has ever denied in unequivocal terms that Netaji was present on its soil after 1945. Its first official statement on the Netaji mystery was made on November 3, 1970. It made no reference whatsoever about Netaji's presence in that country and only said "with full responsibility" that the Soviet authorities " had nothing to do with the fate of Subhash Chandra Bose". Now, fate is a very big word. To Dhar it is curious that a communist regime should take recourse to the ambiguity conveyed by it. Did the Soviets mean to say "death"? In that case, they could be in the clear because if one looks at Netaji's later life through the Bhagwanji angle, Moscow cannot be accused of lying. And, in case, they meant "destiny", then too the communist regime would be in the clear because, after all, they only gave him short-term hospitality. What is certain to rock the boat is that part of the Commission's report which is expected to blast the government for its indifference to the entreaties of Professor Purabi Ray's that Justice Mukherjee be allowed to go to Moscow to study the KGB and Stalin archives. The plucky lady from Kolkata had presented substantial evidence that Netaji was alive and well in Stalinist Russian along with statements from Russian scholars who had seen proof of this.http://headlines.sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=13701731 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.