Guest guest Posted November 2, 2001 Report Share Posted November 2, 2001 AzhwAr EmperumAnAr Jeeyar TiruvadigalE Saranam Appan ThiruvadigalE Saranam Dear Sri Mukundan I just read your post on the mis-information. This is my 2 cents worth. I have come to an understanding that, view expressed by some, particularly within the USA, w.r.t our sampradhayam and its existance are very extreme. It is rather unfortunate that, some of these views do not hold water in India, but seems to be very acceptable to some Sri Vaishnavas outside India. It is also my belief that we need to ignore some these views and go about educating those who are loosing interest in our sampradhayam. If views like these come from some high ranking religious person, then we need to take some action to counter it, other than that, we should try not to get distracted by such statements. Adiyen Venkatesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2001 Report Share Posted November 3, 2001 srImathE rAmAnujAya namaha srImadh varavara munayE namaha Dear Mukundan, This is precisely one of the problem that I am thinking about for quite sometime, which we should tackle with utmost care. The only way, I feel, is , creating information database on the net. We have many scholars writing on such disputes. We have the great Puttur Sri Krishnaswamy Iyengar , the author of the magazine "Sri Vaishnava Sudarsanam", who has written numerous articles on this. I take this opportunity to introduce all members to Sri Puttur swamy (for who do not know him). He is probably in his late 70s or early 80s (I am not sure), very weak (weak enough to even get up from his bed). The amount of untiring efforts he has put during his lifetime for the samrakshaNa of the Ramanuja sampradhAyam and Sri Vaishnavam as whole, is beyond words. He has brought out a lot of books on Azhwar-Acharyas' Sri Sookthis and their Vyakhyanams. Whenever any thing is written ill about Sri Vaishnavism as a whole or the Ramanuja sampradhAyam, he will be the first to voice the protest. To date, there are many people who are yet to reply to his questions, when they attempted to deface the Sri Vaishnavism or the Ramanuja Sampradhayam. A Partial list of those people include, 1. Sri Kanchi Sankaracharya (both Sri Chandrasekara saraswathi swamy and the present day Jayendra saraswathi swamy). Probably the only block they received for their preachings against Sri Vaishnavism is only from Sri Puttur Swamy and Sri P.B.A swamy. 2. Sri Madurantakam T.E. Veeraragavachar swamy,( I will give a brief account of his argument with Sri Puttur Swamy which is very much related to this message) 3. Sri D.T. Thathachariar swamy (he once wrote that, a small Village, Thiruvarangam, near ThirukkOvalUr, is also a divya dEsam and the vimAnam of the temple "ChandOgya vimAnam" is what Sri Thirumangai AzhwAr referred to as " sandOgA thalaivanE" in his illustrious Periya Thirumozhi sAtrumaRai pAsuram "nandA naragathu azhundhAvagai...". He is yet to reply to Sri Puttur Swamy's questions. 4. Sri Agnihotram Ramanuja Thathachariar swamy (He even when to the extent of saying Vishnu is not the supreme god and in Vedas, no where it is said that Vishnu is the supreme god). He is yet to reply to Sri Puttur Swamy' questions. The style with which he writes is remarkable. He does not speak anything without the proofs from the poorvAchArya Sri Sookthis. He has given us with remarkable works in association with Sri Velukkudi Varadachariar swamy, the proud father of the proud son, Sri Velukkudi Krishnan swami (also a member of our list) Coming to the subject back, one of such books explained above is "siddhOpAya vijayam" which was authored by both Sri Puttur Swamy and Sri V.Varadachariar swamy. This book is a rebuttal to the misinformations that were being spread by Sri Madurantakam swamy and Sri D.T.T swamy that the poorvAchAryas' (like Sri Nanjeeyar , Nampillai et al) thiruvuLLam is in line with only Sri Desikar's thiruvuLLam and so they are also only vadakalai in nature. They even went to extent of saying that swami maNavALa mAmunigaL's thiruvuLLam is also in line with the vadakalai sampradhAyam. The exact situation that Sri Mukundan faced in Denver. This book gives a lot of pramANams refuting their claim and thereby establishing that the true Ramanuja sampradhayam (Sri Vaishnavam) is the present day ThennAchArya sampradhAyam. I read the book two times, but sorry, still my knowledge gain is very less. So I request Sri Velukkudi Krishnan Swamy who introduced me to that book, to probably bring out the essence of the book in english so that the same can be archived in the net and given to those who make such false propaganda and make them shut. This I hope is the most sAttvika way of refuting the false claim and establishing the truth. AzhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadigaLE saraNam adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, Thirumalai Vinjamoor Venkatesh Dan Pattangi <danp ramanuja > cc: [ramanuja] How to stop 03-11-01 Misinformation - Seek Info. 12:09 AM Please respond to ramanuja sri: Respected Devotees: Humble Pranams: In Denver the lady (Not revealing Name) who spoke on Swami Vedanta Desika, started saying this Ramanuja Sampradaya did not exist till 200 Yrs ago. Every thing has always been Desika Sapradaya (All the Azhwars & Acharyas Including Ramanuja, EMbar, Bhattar, Nanheeyar, Nampillai were all Vadakalai) These type of extreme untruth does a lot of damange to the community and culture. (And this too at a ISCKON temple) When we had our turn to speak: (Started with Srisailesa daya...) adiyEN just stuck to the Mamunigal vaibhavam. but made two points: Munnor Mozhindha Murai Tappal Kettu, Pinnorndhu TaMadhanai Pesadhe. (From Upadesa Ratina Malai: Do not say things on your own, just learn from previous great acharyas, only repeat what they say, with references to them) [For this the older lady later said she has heard this from their acharyan] I think the some devotees are misusing their acharya's name or the .... Then adiyEn said: Astika Nastikan : Again from Upadesa Rattina Malai, We can be with Astikas, and we can also accept Nastikas, but the utmost dangerous are the Astika Nastikas (Rougues who look like Astikas, but from inside are spreading the wrong message of our Acharyas and damaging the system.] It is just crazy that there is soo much to be done for the Ramanuja Sampradaya here, but within ourselves (Ramanuja & desika sampradaya) so much misinformation is causing soo much rift. We seek your guidance in how to approch this. Please give ideas, suggestions based on which we will setup a plan of action and start in the next few weeks. With Acharyas & Scholars blessings we will put up a facts Site. with the real facts for all to at least know the facts. (Devotional service being the Key) ================================================================ azhwar EmberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam adiyEn rAmAnujA dAsan Mukundan Vangkipuram Pattangi azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam Your use of is subject to * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The information contained in this message is legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressed individual or entity indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person). It must not be read, copied, disclosed, distributed or used by any person other than the addressee. Unauthorised use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Opinions, conclusions and other information on this message that do not relate to the official business of any of the constituent companies of the SANMAR GROUP shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the Group. If you have received this message in error, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by e-mail. Thank you. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.