Guest guest Posted April 10, 2002 Report Share Posted April 10, 2002 Sri: SrimathE Ramanujaya Namaha: Azhwar emperumAnAr Jeeyar thiruvadigalE Saranam Appan thiruvadigalE Saranam Dear Members, I was going over some sections of Tatvattrayam and came across a statement, roughly tanslates as follows: "The differences in forms of nityodita and sAntodita are beyond the scope of this work and are difficult to understand" .... 193 This is the first time I am comming across these two terms. Where can I find more inforamtion about these two terms. Does Sri Pillai Lokachariyar himself refer to these two as complex terms and difficult to understand or is it the translation that is incorrect. thanks Adiyen Venkatesh Elayavilli http://www.srivaishnava.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2002 Report Share Posted April 11, 2002 srImathE rAmAnujAya namah dear bhAgavathAs, srI venkatEsh eLayavalli had asked > "The differences in forms of nityodita and sAntodita are beyond the > scope of this work and are difficult to understand" .... 193 > > This is the first time I am comming across these two terms. Where can > I find more inforamtion about these two terms. the following is my attempt in providing clarification. Please forgive me if there are errors. srImathE rAmAnujAya namah srI venkatEsh eLayavalli had asked regarding the difference between nityOditha and chAndOditha, in the context of tattvatrayam 193. This sUtra (193) is in Isvara prakaraNa, where assertions are made regarding the concept of the LOrd, His different forms and His qualities. In the immediately previous (182 and after) sUtrAs, svAmi piLLai lOkAchAriAr starts elaboration on the 5 forms of the Lord - para, vyUha, vibhava, antharyAmi and archa. sUtra 183 defines the para form. 184 defines the vyUha form. 185 talks about the speciality of the para and vyUha forms. 186 talks about sankarshaNa and pradhyumna forms. 187 talks about pradhyumna form. 188 talks about anirudhdha form. 189 is an introduction about the vibhava form. 189: "vibhavam ananthamAy gowNa mukhya bhEdhaththAlE pEthiththu irukkum" i.e. the vibhava forms of the Lord are countless in number, and are in two sub-categories; gowNa and mukhyA. {svAmi maNavALa mAmunigaL's commentary beautifully describes the relative lowliness of the gowNa vibhava avathAra compared to mukyha vibhava avathAra - a topic for a later discussion in this group?} 190, 191 and 192 talks about the forms that are important to truth-seekers and those that are unimportant. 193 is a big sUtra. Here, svAmi talks about the differences that are apparent among the various forms (and subforms) of the para/vyUha/vibhava avatArAs (like having different number of hands, differnt colours etc..), and concludes that he will not expand on those because these differences are secrets (avatAra rahasyAs) and will be difficult to understand by anyone. That sUtra starts with one type of difference - "nityOditha chAndhOdhithAdhi bhEdhamum".. here nityOdita = means "being praised/revealed by the words of the nityAs" chAndOditha = "being praise/revealed by the words of the vEdAs" {or by the words of experts in vEdAs} chAndasa: can refer to both vEdA and those who are very learned in the vEdAs. In simple terms, nityOdita refers to paravAsudEva, the form that is being worshipped/enjoyed by the nityAs and mukthAs. chAndOdita refers to vyUha vAsudEva form that is outside of srIvaikuNtam. i.e. the difference between the paravAsudEVa form and the vyUha vAsudEva form is what is meant by "nityOdita chAndOditaadhi bhEdamum". In svAmi maNavALa mAMunigaL's commentary, svAmi mentions one more detail. He quotes svAmi vEdAnta dEsika: "naalum uNdaayirukka moonRu enkiradhu vyUha vAsudEva rUpaththukku para rUpaththiR kAttil anusandhEya guNabhEdham illAmaiyaalE"! i.e. even though there are four vyUha forms (vAsudEva, sankarshNa, pradyumna, anirudhdha), it is classified as three sometimes because there is no difference in the qualities and mode of meditation/worship between para vAsudEva and vyUha vAsudEva. AzhvAr emperumAnAr jIyar thiruvadigaLE saraNam, adiyEn madhurakavi dAsan, varadhan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.