Guest guest Posted June 11, 2002 Report Share Posted June 11, 2002 Dear srivaishnavas, please accept adiyal's humble namaskarams. Ramayanam- uddha kanadam-sargam:17,slokam:2 ------------- " Ithyuktva parusham vaakyam Raavanam Ravananuja Aajagaama muhurthena yatra Ramaha sa Lakshmanaha" Vibishana arrived Rama's place after advicing Ravana. Why did Muni phrase the sentence in above manner instead of saying that vibishana "left"for Rama's place. He lists the reasons as follows. Vibishana detached his relationship with Ravana and concluded that the most fitting place for him there after would be only Rama's place and to hint this Muni used the word "arrived".or, 2.Since vibishana could not stand for a moment and bustled out from Ravana's place as one would escape from a burning house muni used the word "arrived".or, 3.LIke a calf that, once the knot is released will become restless until it keeps its mouth in its cow's udder, vibishana too fleed to Rama's place for survival/salvation and hence muni used the word "arrived". ("Raama goshtiyil serndaal alladhu uyir darikka maataadavanai viraindu vandhan") "Thaai naadu kandre pol, thaan thuzhayan adikke poi naadi kollum purindhu".(first thiru vandhaadi-30) 4. from vaalmki muni's perspection staying in a country that had developed relatoinship wi -th Rama was considered more preferable than having a relationship with Rama himself. "Raama sambandhathai kattilum Ramanodu sambandhitha Desame uddesam engai". Besides, Rama's close associates might not allow any one to develope contact with Rama ,but there might not be anyone preventing the entry to a country that gained "Rama sambandham." Just like parama padam where saatya devass reside(yatra poorve saatya sandhi devaha)the chitra koota malai also, the place where now Rama stays is a hallowed mountain. Thus vaalmiki describes the supremacy of the chitra kooota malai and the greatness of the (desa vaibhavam)country as well. Rama nujam la ksmana poorvancha: both (Rama and Lakshmana) represents each other. Sa Lakshmanaha:Lakshmana stands for "nirupaktvam"'to Rama piran and one who surrenders at the feet of bagahavan need not be afraid of him being a"vijaathiyan."There is a "sajaathiyan", Lakshmana who is always seen beside Rama. Altthough vibishana was his own brother, Ravana and his goshti derided him and his advice gained no value in Ravana's court,conversely, in Rama goshti what ever uttered by Lakshmana were treated as law. Thus by this slokam ,it is infered that a person who consecrated his soul/life to bagavan must not only leave the place of an agnostic but also must reach the abode of bagavan. With thi adiyel conclude the remaining part of the 17th sargam, slokam 2and shall post the vyaakyanam for 18th slokam in my next mail. Adiyel apologise for any mistakes in my interpretation of the vyaakyanam as well as in the presentation. adiyel Ramanuja Daasyai Srilatha Gunaseelan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.