Charanaghathi and Prapatti

[Guest guest]

Sri:

 

Srisailesa dayapaathram Deepakthyaathi gunaarnavam!

Yatheendra pravanam vandhe Ranyajamataram munim!!

 

dasan,

 

Looking back our poorvaacharya stotramalas or

poorvaacharya granthas what we could possibly see is

that out of the vast knowledge about the grammer and

the philosophy he has, the aacharya would have used

enourmous number of words at different places to

state the same meaning. also would have used one word

which would give many different meanings at many

places(which has to be taken according to

context,which unfortunately becomes the starting

point of some conflict).Also Would have used

particular words instead of the many possibe words for

particular meaning.Also many more like that.

 

For example if we see for the first type all the 1000

names including narayana is used for perumaan himself

all of them converges to same meaning and also if we

take the gadhyatrayam perumaan will be called many

names like pranathaarthihara etc. All of them will

have the same meaning. This is not bound to names of

perumaal but this is just for example.here the

controversy is rare but can be created easily within

no time if anyone is well versed in tharka(the topic

falls in this category).

 

The second controversial use as like one word/phrase

to imply many meanings right from brahma sootra "aham

brahmosmi" will always be interpreted differently and

will create a great divide among the shishya kotis.

 

The third type particular word anywhere for particular

meaning everywhere is for example using "akila" in

sri bashya mangala charanam by swamy emperumanaar.

 

lets start it step by step.

 

In the first category lets go to some very basic

grammer( i woudnt call this a grammer but since it is

a part we have to say it is grammer).

 

If we take english there are words called synonyms.

for example the words big and huge are synonyms. both

follow the "wh" questions like "how big" and "how

huge". if somebody says big and huge are different

that will be true in one form. Yes in the form that

they contain different letters.

 

lets take another example the words "phobia" and

"fear" again both are synonymous and of course

different letters.of course we cant use fear after

claustr and make it claustrfear where we use phobia

and making it claustrophobia meaning fear of

heights.but the point is that fear and phobia are

synonyms.

 

Since english is a very recent language lets leave it

and do not take in as our base.lets take tamil which

is as old as sanskrit itself or was one of the

languages which broke away from it.

 

What a beauty, we have synonyms here too. the words

"pini"( the three suzhi na) and "noi" both mean the

same word disease. the same way for example other

words like "ucchi","mugadu" all mean the same thing

top or the highest point. also like "parai" and

"murasu" both mean the same big drum.

 

if we go a bit deep the words "polaponraanna"

"maanakaduppa" all mean the same.in the place of

one thing we can use anything

and the meaning will not change. of course the

sentence will change.

 

why are we seeing this and this mail didnt say

anything about what poorvacharyas said!!!.The folowing

mails will. lets give a small think about what this

mail says. we will see what sanskrit and later what

poorvacharyas have told in the coming mails.

 

Any misinformation or something wrong adiyen is ready

to correct myself.

 

adiyen ramanuja dasan,

Nallan Chakravarthy Narashiman.

 

 

 

Finance - Get real-time stock quotes

http://finance.