Guest guest Posted August 30, 2002 Report Share Posted August 30, 2002 Dear bhAgavatAs, Namaskarams! I am new to posting mails to such groups as this. Hence my advanced apologies if my wordings are not lingua-compliant. One of the things that creeps up time and again is the difference in philosophical opinions among our sects and subsects. Is it possible to be a SriVaishnava purely by believing in HIM the Ubiquitous Sriman Narayana and acting in a non-dualistic way instead of dwelling into the intricacies of esoteric man-made and often conflicting interpretations about HIM? With regards dAsan R.SoundararAjan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2002 Report Share Posted September 3, 2002 Sri Parthasarathi thunai Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha Dear Sri Soundararajan, Sorry for the delay in reply but there goes the saying better late than never. Emperuman doesnt see if one is a brahmin or a non brahmin. Nor does he see any sect or subsect difference. Only thing perumal sees is bhakthi, the deep devotion or premai we have towards him. Though it has been accepted in sastras and sampradayam that perumal is the root cause for even creating this differences. Then you may ask why he has created differences? Our acharyas explain this as follows. It is enough to have just rice to fill our stomach but do we stop with that. We need variety in eating, dressing and in entertainment. That is why even emperuman in different divya desams exhibit different gunas and are in different forms. All of us are jeevatmas and have same amount of jnana but again there is a difference in our approach, understanding capacity and faith. That is why the difference in varna, jathi etc has crept. Similarly even in our Srivaishnava community there are different sects and subsects. We may belong to any sect or subsect it doesnt matter our ultimate goal should be to reach the lord. The philosophical knowledge only aids us to get away from this lowkikam and go towards pAramArteekam. So there is no use just fighting between us on philosophical points since that goes against the very cause. Our acharyas show us the right path. In our sampradayam, acharyas play a more important role so it is good for any one to follow the sampradayam as thought by his/her acharya. As you said, it is not that easy to remain neutral not belonging to any of the sect or sampradayam. When we get involved in the sampradayam following our acharyas we are less prone to be caught in the mayai of bhagavan but when we try to act on ourselves thinking that we have the power to act on our own, we may even fall due to lack of our strength. When a child tries to walk on its own it may fall but if the mother carries the child then the child will never fall unless the mother herself falls. Similarly if our acharyas hold our hand and take us to the emperuman and makes him hold us then we will never get lost but if we try to go by ourselves to reach emperuman then we may get lost in the way. So it is absolutely necessary for all srivaishnavas to undertake samasrayanam(here adiyen doesnt refer to just the panchasamskaram ceremony but the total refuge under an acharya doing service to him to take us in the right path and put us under the lotus feet of Sri Parthasarathi) under an acharya and follow what the acharya preaches. It is not necessary that you have to get into philosophical controversies we can always have pure premai towards the bhagavan and get involved in his bhakthi and satsangam. My sincere suggestion to you is to listen to Sri Sri Krishna premi swamigal's bhagavatam(Ekadasa skandham) where he tells in detail about bhagavata dharmam. Sri Sri Krishna Premi anna is one who lives according to Sri Mamunigal's words, "MunnOr mozhindha mozhi tappAmal kEttu pinnOrdhu tham Adanai pEsAdhE". He is filled with not only jnanam but also anushtanam, a great mahan. He is one example who enjoys all bhagavat vishayam with atmost faith in Sriman Narayana. He mainly concentrates only on spreading krishna bhakthi to the masses and passing the message of rishis,alwars, acharyas and all bhakthas to all. Alwar EmperumAnAr Jeeyer thiruvadigalE sharanam Adiyen Ramanuja Dasyai Sumithra Varadarajan svadoolan wrote:Dear bhAgavatAs, Namaskarams! I am new to posting mails to such groups as this. Hence my advanced apologies if my wordings are not lingua-compliant. One of the things that creeps up time and again is the difference in philosophical opinions among our sects and subsects. Is it possible to be a SriVaishnava purely by believing in HIM the Ubiquitous Sriman Narayana and acting in a non-dualistic way instead of dwelling into the intricacies of esoteric man-made and often conflicting interpretations about HIM? With regards dAsan R.SoundararAjan azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam Finance - Get real-time stock quotes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2002 Report Share Posted September 3, 2002 ramanuja, Varadarajan Sourirajan <varadarajan_tcs> wrote <snipped> -- Dear Ms. Sumithra Varadarajan, Namaskaram! Thanks for taking the opportunity to clarify amidst your other kaimkaryams. I do agree with you regarding the need for an Acharyan and performance of samasrayanam. I also agree that the Acharyan leads us (a`la lead kindly light and thAyinum parindhu sAla). But from the endless number of arguments that is going on in and elsewhere do you really think we sishyAs are going with them like kids? I somehow get a feeling we are breaking loose from them like a mad chained beast. I do agree that it is out of affection for our leader that we tend to stare at the oncoming stranger fearing they would harm our master. Should we really worry so much? Irrespective of our allegiance a number of us have undergone samasrayanam. We are all a collective bunch waiting in a hall ready to reach HIM. Akin to sitting in the waiting goondu at Tirupati endlessly chanting Govinda! Govinda! Does it then make sense to argue at length what is the optimal way of reaching the goondu instead of preparing ourselves to seeing HIM? Shouldnt we take as much opportunity to learn as much good things about HIM irrespective of from whom it came. Would we have an opportunity to recite Dhivya Prabandham, Vairagya Panchakam, Upadesa RattinamAlai, Naka Stuti, NarayanIyam etc.., etc.., once we reach mOksham? While this may sound idealistic, I have seen many accomplish this. I wish we spend more time listening to our Acharyans than listening to external distractions. BTW This is not in direct or indirect reference to any particular post. This is not an attempt to pretend holier-than-thou. This is only a loud thinking a soul search attempt. With regards dAsan R.SoundararAjan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2002 Report Share Posted September 4, 2002 Dear Sriman Vadoolan, Even if we do not undergo samasrayanam, we may still reach Him, since it is emberumAn Who is the upAya and not samASrayaNam. yet samASrayaNa has got its significance. Putting the marks of His Chakra and Sankha on our body is recoginition of the fact that this body belongs to Him and not to the soul which is housed in it. Like a vessel on which these marks are there is exclusively for His kainkaryam, this body is also supposed to be exclusively for Him. An Acharya is the one who gives the gnAna that He is the upAya and upEya. In our sampradAyam, all Acharyas believe that He is the means and goal. But how many people really interact with their samASrayaNa Acharya and get to know this? Even self got this mind set from an Acharya other than my samASrayana Acharya. One can get this gNana directly from PerumAL, or from a book, or by listening to a upanyAsam, or by interacting with a sadAchArya as Lord KrushNa says "tadviddhi praNipAtEna.." in BG. So the AchArya can be either Perumal Himsellf by default or author of a book or an upanyAsaka or some other devout Srivaishnava. Sri Pillai lOkAchArya says that we have to treat every fellow Bhagavata with the same abhimAnam with which we treat our Acharya, in Sri Vachana BhooshaNam. dasudu Vishnu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2002 Report Share Posted September 4, 2002 Sri Parthasarathi thunai Srimathe Ramanujaya Namaha Dear Sri Soundararajan svadoolan wrote: But from the endless number of discussions that is going on in and elsewhere do you really think we sishyAs are going with them like kids? I somehow get a feeling we are breaking loose from them like a mad chained beast. I do agree that it is out of affection for our leader that we tend to stare at the oncoming stranger fearing they would harm our master. Should we really worry so much? I do accept that there are many endless discussions going on in the . When we try to learn something always we come across some which are necessary and some which are not. So it will be wise to select the necessary ones and leave the rest as asaram. In the present stage it is not possible for each one of us to learn all the sampradayic vishayams directly from our acharyas so we have to try to learn with the guidance of our acharyas(acharya kataksham is enough). Just the kataksham of our acharyas will lead us in the right path and help us to differentiate between sAram and asAram. Irrespective of our allegiance a number of us have undergone samasrayanam. We are all a collective bunch waiting in a hall ready to reach HIM. Akin to sitting in the waiting goondu at Tirupati endlessly chanting Govinda! Govinda! Does it then make sense to argue at length what is the optimal way of reaching the goondu instead of preparing ourselves to seeing HIM? Shouldnt we take as much opportunity to learn as much good things about HIM irrespective of from whom it came. Would we have an opportunity to recite Dhivya Prabandham, Vairagya Panchakam, Upadesa RattinamAlai, Naka Stuti, NarayanIyam etc.., etc.., once we reach mOksham? Surely we have to prepare to reach the emperuman. We are all so lucky to possess such great collections of our azhvars and acharyas. Even one janma is not enough to enjoy each work and their vyakhyanams. We all should join hands to enjoy and make others enjoy all the works of our acharyas. While this may sound idealistic, I have seen many accomplish this. I wish we spend more time listening to our Acharyans than listening to external distractions. I truly accept with you in this regard. Hope emperuman Sri Parthasarathi will make this true. Azhwar emberumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadigalE saraNam Adiyen Ramanuja Dasyai Sumithra Varadarajan [Msg from Moderator: Please discuss issues with the intention to learn and share] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.