Guest guest Posted September 30, 2002 Report Share Posted September 30, 2002 Respected moderator, My point is that it is impossible for an elephant's leg to be gripped by a crocodile; this is a zooological impossibility.Perhaps an expert in this field can be consulted. With dandan samarpanam Devarajsa Dasan [Msg From moderator: Gajendra Moksham is accepted by the faithful for those who want to speculate, feel free to do so, No body is stopping you. Same applies to existance of God ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2002 Report Share Posted September 30, 2002 Sri: Srimathe Ramanujaya nama: Dear Sri Devarajan, Gajendra moksham is a "paradigm". A paradigm is a pattern,model,an assumption or a concept to view the "reality". For what? For the community that shares it especially in an intellectual field. Why is it impossible zoologically? You can create such a situation(esp in Florida which is full of Alligators!). Two days back one guy lost half of his arm(he was attacked by the alligator,alligators move very swiftly without creating any ripples that you don't even notice them! But the poor alligator was shot by another man,took the half-arm from its mouth and rushed the other guy to the hospital so that doctors could attach the arm. It was late and the alligator had twisted all the tissues when it attacked him. BTW we are not their preys but still they know martial arts;they want to defend themselves when someone is close to their territory!). SO,it's verily zoologically possible. Moreover it's mentioned in Srimad BhAgavatam too but that's upto one to take or leave it. One of my friend is a member of wildlife and he was within 15 ft distance of a tiger in a forest and he says there is always the risk and hence fun. In essence,"gajendra moksham" is to show the "extant" the Lord goes for the one who has faith in Him. HE will do anything. He is satyavAn but still may go back on His own words(He Himself was ready to strike BhISmA with His discus for the sake of ArjunA but finally He doesn't do). AzhvAr EmperumAnAr Jeeyar TiruvadigaLE saraNam nappinnai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2002 Report Share Posted September 30, 2002 Dear Sri Devarajan, ramanuja, devaraj kandadai <dkandadai> wrote: > Respected moderator, > this is a zooological impossibility.Perhaps an expert > in this field can be consulted. > With dandan samarpanam > > Devarajsa Dasan > I am neither a pachyderm nor a croc expert. Nevertheless, First of all, it is NOT a zoological impossibility. Second, it is NOT prudent to use myopic science and our still smaller understanding of it to question indefatigable truths. Let us look at the Morphometrics of the two animals (with due apologies to the other group members for dwelling onto needless mathemagics) Crocs have a jaw size of approx. 8 feet Crocs jaws can maximally be apart upto 90 degrees. This forms a triangle with an area of ***32 sq feet*** . Max height of an Asian elephant is 4 metres (size hasnt changed much evolutionarily) The Circumference of the forefoot (which is larger than the leg) is approx half the shoulder height. Which means it cannot be more than 2 meters. 2*pi*r = 2 metres => r = ***** 0.3183 metres ***** ----> (A) Now, What is the radius of the circle that can be inscribed within a triangle of area 32 sq feet? rInsc = area/k ; k = (a+b+c)/2; a,b,c being sides of triangle => rInsc = 32/13.65 = 2.34 feet rInsc = 2.34 feet = 2.34 * 0.3048 metres = 0.7132 metres ---> (B) rInsc/r = 0.7132/0.3183 = 2.24 Which means the Croc can maximally grab MORE than TWO forefoot. Regards dasan R.SoundarrAjan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2002 Report Share Posted October 1, 2002 Dear BhAgavatas, I don't think it is necessary to try to make such analysis. Even zoologically it is agreed that animals have evolved. So why talk about it from our time's reference. For example, it is said that Gajendra and the crocodile fougt for 1000 years - this would also be an impossibility from today's knowledge. Who knows what changes that both animals as well as time itself have undergone? Instead, I think we should try to understand what the message that this parable is teaching us (and importantly inculcates in young minds as this story is told to children). adiyEn TCA Venkatesan --- devaraj kandadai <dkandadai wrote: > Respected moderator, > > My point is that it is impossible > for an elephant's leg to be gripped by a crocodile; > this is a zooological impossibility.Perhaps an expert > in this field can be consulted. > With dandan samarpanam > > Devarajsa Dasan > > [Msg From moderator: Gajendra Moksham is accepted by the > faithful > for those who want to speculate, feel free to do so, No > body is > stopping you. > Same applies to existance of God ] > > > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & http://sbc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.