Guest guest Posted October 11, 2002 Report Share Posted October 11, 2002 SRIMATHE RAMANUJAYA NAMAHA APPAN THIRUVADIGALE SARANAM. Dear Smt.Nappinnai Accept my pranam. Adiyen am an undergraduate,(due to family circumstances had to earn than to learn). Yet Emperuman is very kind enough to place me in a comfortable position in life materially and spiritually. Adiyen am wondering as to why Emperuman is so partial towards me when many of my kith and kin do not enjoy such a position. He alone can explain. Anyway, Adiyen am able to grasp the substances of your postings and offering my comments.(on thoughts of Physics) 1. suitable examples. Moon is not there when nobody looks at it. When a tree falls in the forest,the noise is not heard/no noise if there is no observer. You can keep on going like this. We have created the universe out of our consciousness(otherwise there is no universe)! Einstein was opposing this view till his last day. This crazy idea of Copenhagen Interpretation(matter doesn't exists untill an observer looks at it) # Perhaps, these people require direct personal observance(Pratyaksha Pramana). This is not always possible and will not go to prove that the event did not happen or exist. (False,defective conclusions) Also, it is not correct to deny facts because you are not involved 2. Locality: What this means is that no action on my part can affect what other person sees. Quantum Theory is non-local and violates light barrier. # Fantastic 3. He doesn't decide to prepare the pizza after i order. So even before ordering,he must have the pizzas ready so that it can be delivered in 10 mnts. This is an example for local-ness. QT says he has telepathy(non-local,information travels faster than light)about what I'm going to order before-hand and keeps the pizza ready. Nobody will believe this # Telepathy is not required for this. Only common sense and business acumen will be sufficient. What kind of fantastic conclusions are being made! 4. Shankara's advaita suffers from fundamental logical flaw. # Sankara’s Advaita that there is only one Brahman is agreed by Ramanuja also. But, the way in which everything is explained varies. Sanakara had to invent on ‘Avidhya”. It should either be a different one from Brahman Or it should be Brahman itself. In both cases, Advaithic arguments are elusive and defective. They have been very well proved by Ramanuja. To accept it or not is any body’s free will. Ramanuja has proved well by Sareera sareeri Bhava. 5. most of the westerners are brainwashed by the advaita theory. Lots of germans do research in srivaishnavism. Most of the views of Copenhagen interpretation reflects advaitic views. # Unfortunate lot. Those who are doing research in Srivaishnavism will clear this mess. Let us hope so. 6. There is an ideally isolated system which contains a Geiger counter and placed near a radioactive source that emits gamma rays. the intensity of the rays is adjusted in such a way that in an hour,there is a 50% probability of the Counter to record one count. This counter is connected to a device,which when countoccurs,willshattera flask of deadly poison that would then fill the box where the cat is located. there is a 50% probability that no count will occur leaving the box intact. Experimenter seals the box and leaves the system undisturbed for an hr and at the end of the hr,Schroedinger asks: "what is the quantum mechanical state of the system just immediately before the box is opened and observation is made?" Acc. to QT,cat is half dead and half alive. It's only when the observer opens the box,does he determine the fate of the cat! # The conclusion should be either the cat has gone asleep or the mechanism has failed mysteriously. By the way what is the cause that will set the devise in motion and what is the basis it will work? It is like the story of two mothers claiming the baby as theirs and ready to take half of the baby evendead. 7. Determinism; QT is non-deterministic,deals with statistical averages(randomness). This uncertainty(Heisenberg and Bohr's complementarity principle is related to uncertainty)does not lie in our ability to measure but in Nature itself(nature is absurd!). Einstein sharply remarked that:"I can't believe that God plays dice with the universe". He totally disliked the fact that quantum theory implies that reality is observer-created. His thought experiment(subtle many people misunderstand incl his two collaborators)counter to Copenhagen interpretation was: Certain elements of reality exist in the world that are not described by the quantum formalism. Einstein,Schroedinger,Dirac,Bell,Bohm were all opposing it staunchly. Only time can answer. # Let us hope so. 8. Copenhagen interpretation was closed for almost 4 decades,only in the past decade,physicists started devising sensitive instruments(no where near Einstein's subtle thought experiment)to either prove Einstein's standpoint or refute Copenhagen interpretation. Another important aspect of QT is there is no attribute attached to the reality. Before I eat apple,apple would have had the attribute of sweetness(irrespective of my eating or not). But QT negates it. It's because of my eating(observer's knowledge)that apple has got the attribute. So many fat books have been written on QT and one can go on talking. But i wanted to post it to convey the message "the limitation of science". #QT appears to be fantastic. It is against realities; Perhaps by the influence of Advaitha. 9.A quote from Einstein(more than a wonderful theoretical physicist,he was a great human being,he was a free spirit,was easily approachable by anyone without barriers "A human being is part of the whole(universe);a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself,his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest- a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of a prison for us,restricting us to our personal desires and affection for a few person nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to "embrace" all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. Nobody is able to achieve this completely but the striving for such achievement,is in itself, a part of the liberation and a foundation for inner security" # Hats off to Einstein! A wonderfulman. 10. Readers may wonder where I'm heading towards. But don't forget that Einstein was a firm believer in God. Karma on one side and Lord's grace on the other side! # Smt.Nappinai madam, thanks for your educative posting. Emperumanar had a kind heart and sound logic. He won over his opponents and they became his disciples. Yet, the Advaitihic influence still persists. It is up to the new order who do research in Srivaishnavism to set things right. Adiyen Ramanuja dasan, T.parthasarathy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.