Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 Respected members of this list. It is with intrepidation that I put forward this post regarding a topic on which the learned have commented: ". . . strangely enough this question is never really asked by any of our Vedantic philosophers such as Sankara, Ramanuja, etc., as far as I know" [Mani, Bhakti list (BL), May 2002]. "This topic appears to have been exhausted . . . perhaps we should move on to other issues. Thanks, Moderator " [bL, May 2002]. "If one can answer why HE did such such a thing, then it means that you know how HE thinks! Gitacharyan says nobody (means NOBODY) knows the secret of His birth" [Gita, BL, May 2002]. The comments were in response to an innocent question posed by one Sri Ranganathan Sounderrajan on the Bhakti List: "Why did god create universe and the living beings? [bhakti list, May 1 2002]" A flood of postings then followed on the Lord's 'lila of creation'. Some postings implied that our understanding of the purpouse behind this creation lila will forever remain a mystery and, since nobody can know the mind of God, effectively 'off-bounds'. One illustrious contributer, perhaps in sheer exasperation, advised Swamy Soundeerajan: "May be you should put the question at the feet of Lord SriRanganatha Himself" [bL, May 2002]. Since certain perspectives and priorities of the Bhakti List are not entirely congruent with my own, I refrained from entering the discusion. However, since the issue has re-surfaced on the Ramanuja List, we can go one better than "puting the question {of the why and wherefore of creation}at the feet of Lord Ranganatha"- we can ask His Acarya, Sri Manavalamamunighal . Hence this im-promto posting. (The account below reflects the experiance of one soul. It is but one story; 'your', 'her' or 'his' story may differ). -------------------------------- The Lila of Creation So where to begin? As far back as recorded history goes would seem to be as good a place as any. It was my darkest hour. I lay inert like a bird with broken wings, too depressed to experiance not only hapiness but even pain. Concerned for my uplift, the Lord gave me a body, a mind and organs of sense and the scriptures to guide me towards Him. Yet in my peversity, not only did I fail to turn to Him but I used my faculties to run away from Him [1]. My abuse of the shastras was an even sadder scenario. Mostly I ignored them; and when I followed their dictates my ego inflated to obnoxious levels. "Through my own efforts I will attain to the highest heavens". Corruption crept into the very heart of my soul as I thought my own deeds were the means for my salvation [2]. Consequently I turned a universe that was supposed to be a vale of soul-making, into a prison of perpetual suffering. Even numerous Avataras failed to make the neccesary corrective impact on me. Yet my Lord was as humble as He was ingenious and patient. He adopted the voice of my despair as His own, and used the miseries of life to steer me towards Him. (The same is true of all beings. How so? Right from birth things happen to us against our wishes. We never want to suffer, yet suffering comes from all sides. The three samsaric miseries- adhidaivika (at the hands of nature), adhyatmika (internal psychosis) and adhibhautika (misery caused by others)- remind us that we are not masters of our own destiny. Our ego is gradualy broken. Then we ask: Who can get us out of this miserable condition? Family, work, nation, etc. are the obvious candidates. Yet familiarity breeds contempt- the more we learn about our 'saviours', the more we loose respect for them. Everyone seems to let us down. Our efforts to drown our sorrows in worldly pleasures come to a similarly unsatisfactory conclusion. Whilst we have an infinte desire for enjoyment, our opportunities and faculties for enjoyment are limited. Then through His grace, one fine day the realisation comes: every sin is really a misguided virtue- the philanderer is not addicted to his ever increasing harem, he is addicted to love, a love that his misguided adventures cannot provide. Similarly, the alchoholic is not addicted to drink, he is addicted to a sense of peace which the world forever denies him. Through one disapointment after the other, the soul learns that whilst this world may occasisonaly give us what we want, it can never give us what we ultimately need. It is simply not up to it). >From these disilusioned emotions the Lord began to spiritually rescucitate me: "athatho brahma jignasa" [3] the Vedas said. "You've tried everything else, now try God" translated the voice of experiance. "Turn to your Lord (ananyarhasheshatva), the only saviour (ananyasaranatva) and only source of bliss (ananyabhogyatva) worthy of your eternal nature", whispered the universe. My haughty ego was now ready to listen: "Having tasted, for long, the fruits , good and bad, of their past deeds (in swarg and hell respectively), there comes a stage, in everyones's life, when serious introspection begins, as to what he is, where he is, whither he is bound and the wherewhithall for attaining the goal" [4]. Battered and bruised by the wheel of samsara, I no longer had the peversity to obstruct His grace. The Divine plan for my salvation could proceed. Indeed, a curious fascination overtook Him as He began my reformation: even my faults were seen as virtues. For example, eager to glimpse femminine beauty at its most excuisite, I once visited the Lord's temple. True to form, the fairer gender appeared in fine silks, braided hair fragrant with flowers' scent, eyes captivating with colouruims hue. With my mischievious intentions satisfied, I departed with hardly a thought for the Lord. Somehow, He considered such a perfidious outing highly meritorious: "See" He said to the hoards of skeptical Nityasuris "has he not come to my temple?" [5]. Gradualy He weaned me away from the lesser beauties and led me towards the correct perspective. His pride and joy in effecting this reformation was immense, and He became nostalgic whilst dotting over the same 'prakrti sarira' that I had once used to evade Him, for: "it was in this body out of numberless bodies assumed by the subject, that the Lord could get (him) at long last, and the sweet aroma of spiritual awakeing emanating therein is so very pleasing to the Lord" [6]. Should we deny Him this pleasure by denouncing our internment in this very samsara that made His redemptive miracle possible? Yet the "Doubt-Master" in us rears his ugly head even as we find ourselves on the verge of the celestial gates. He begins to taunt us: 'So all YOUR suffering, just so HE can have the pleasure of saving you! Why didn't he just create you a Nityasuri, instead of a flawed creature in this dark, miserable and painfull world?'. But even this most subtle and devious "Doubt-Master" can be laid to rest: "No doubt the qualities of sowlabhya (easy accesibility), sowsilya (graciousness) and vatsalya (tender solicitude) are also displayed by the Lord in His 'Para' or transcendental manifestion, presiding in the High Heavens- "Vasudevosi Poornaha". But in that land of perfect bliss and perpetual splendour, these qualities can hardly be perceptible in such a marked degree, as they are in this land of darkeness and despair. There is all the difference between the two spheres as between a light burning in broad daylight and the one shining forth in a dark room" [7]. You see "Doubt-Master", the souls in samsara are in a unique position to appreciate the qualities of the Lord- an insight to make even the Nityasuris jealous. In the Highest Heaven, the Nityasuris are faultless- what scope then for the Lord to expresse a Vatsalya that sees even faults as virtues? The Nityasuris are forever in His prescence- what scope for the Lord to to 'welcome' them with His Saulabhya? And in the highest heaven all the Nityasuris are great- what scope then to relish a Sausilya that finds joy in the company of even hunters and apes? Just as it is only the prodigal son who knows the fullest extent of His father's love, so it is only the errant souls in this "world of darkeness and despair" who fully appreciate the Lord's tenderness and love. Correspondingly, our happiness on reaching the Highest Heaven is excelled only by that of the Lord's "disrtess dispelling feet" [8] who have effected our salvation. It is in taking this bird with broken wings and teaching him how to fly, that our Lord's qualities shine brightest. To enhance His glory, in a manner denied even to the Nityasuris, is the destiny that beckons each and every samsari. Let us accept our destiny and not be chained by our history, and in the words of a very great but lesser playwright than our Lord sing: "All's well that ends well" . . . The above is based on: [1] Introduction to Mumuksupadi [2] Srivacana Bhushanam sutras 115-126; 130-3 [3] Brahma Sutra I.i.i. [4] Srivacana Bhushanam sutras 381-98, trans. Sri Satyamurthi Gwalior [5] Srivacana Bhushanam sutras 381-98 [6] Srivacana Bhushanam sutras 160-8, trans. Sri Satyamurthi Gwalior [7] Srivacana Bhushanam sutras 32-8, trans. Sri Satyamurthi Gwalior [8] Thiruvaimozhi 1.i.i., trans. Sri Satyamurthi Gwalior Other recources used: Mumuksupadi, trans. TCA Venkatesan, available at: Acaryas.org ------------------------------ In conclusion then: "Why did God create universe and the living beings?" 1) He created the universe to provide situations and experiances whereby we might come to know Him 2) He created living beings so that a) we might evolve from inertia to perfect and eternal service of the Lord, b) to offer Him the opportunity to expresse tender virtues such of vatsalya, sausilya, saulabhya. C) Lest we critisise His plan for our salvation (that involves internment in this "world of darkeness and despair"), let us remember that we samsaris are privaleged to enjoy the Lord's tender virtues to an extent denied even the Nityasuris. Of course, there may be many other motives and aspects to the creation lila that we do not know. But thanks to our Acaryas, one purpose behind the creation lila is evident: the Lord's pleasure in effecting our blissfull salvation whilst expressing His tender virtues to their fullest extent. This post is but a spontaneous and brief outpouring of the heart. There are many further issues to be elaborated and clarified. Throughout our enquiries, the brilliant simplicity of Sri Manavalamamunighal will steer us through the complexities of this apparently enigmatic topic. Yours respectfully awaiting advice and correction on the views expressed above, S. Ramanujadasan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 Sri: Srimathe Ramanujaya nama: Dear Sri Ramanujadasan, Humble pranams to you. Very nice article. True indeed that without Sri MaNavALa mAmunigaL's commentaries on various works of pUvAchAryAs,we would have been like wanderers in the forest. You have quoted me/gita/nappinnai(bhakti-list). My response to the question was wrt people quoting big bang theory(which itself is shaky) and physicists like Stefen Hawking. So it was from the angle of science,I made that statement. The statement God created the Universe immediately throws the question who created God. That's why there are many scientists who are either Atheists/Agnostics. I love to restrict myself to EmperumAnAr. Knowingly why EmperumAnAr would ask that question "why God created the Universe and living beings(lIla vibhUthi)". I don't know if Sri Ramanuja has treated this topic in his Sri BhAShyam. I'm reading in the descending order,I was curious to know how the jivatma is received upon liberation. As you said,lIla vibhUthi is for our benefits,to liberate us from this samsAra and it is HE who struggles,toils,waiting to achieve the same. In my eyes,if someone tries to explain love through logic,it only leads to stupidity and ignorance. Surely Lord SriRanganAthA has the power to explain the lIla vibhUthi(put the question at the feet of the Lord). HE has the power which is equivalent(or more)to the entire Universe in the form of a tiny black hole. His reclining pose itself is food for thought that one would feel guilty to go behind human beauties. Is there any beauty that can match the beauty of Sri RanganAthA in bhOga shayanam? NO. Now I can understand the impatience of SriRamanuja to reach Him and the emotions that flow as a result of it in gadyatrayam. We are surely more blessed than nityasuris to experience the reservoir of redemptive mercy of Him. I strongly believe that He has the power to convert an atheist/agnostic to a theist. Note:Don't classify me as learned(that would be a disgrace to the learned people). My knowledge is like that of "maNDUka",the only difference being that Lord has showered His grace on me with the knowledge that there are zillions of people who can outweigh me in knowledge. My own personal experience(direct & indirect) has only strengthened the position of nirhEthuka krpa to infinity. AzhvAr EmperumAnAr Jeeyar TiruvadigaLE saraNam NC Nappinnai/Gita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.