Guest guest Posted November 14, 2002 Report Share Posted November 14, 2002 Forwarding one of Ramanuja Bhaktas mail, =================================== You pretty well know there are 3 basic ‘thathvas’ in our philosophy. One Easwara thathva and only one can be considered as Easwara. No doubt it is Emperuman only. Second ‘Achethana vargam” or matter which cannot express itself. Definetely ‘Thayar’ will not fit in this catogery. Next is ‘Chethana vargam’ or jeevas. The problem is how ‘Thayar’ can be included in this category? Is it not below her dignity? Is it not injustice? Is she inseparable like ‘Siamese twins’? There is a sutra in ‘Mumukshuppadi” Sutra:41 athra bagavathSEnApathimisrar vAkyam: "avan mArbai vittup piriyal ivvaksharam vittup pirivathu". Piratti has been accomadated in Emperuman’s chest This should be taken to mean that Piratti is dear to Emperuman and she always resides in his thoughts. Otherwise how the following facts can be justified? In Ramavathar she was separated by Ravana and was in Lanka for ten months. Again she was sent to forest by Rama himself. On the third occasion, when Rama asked her to prove her “Ananyarhathvam” she departed from him once for all. In archavatharam, there is a pasuram”Akalakillen Iraiyum enru Alarmel mangai urai marba'. This is with reference to Lord Sreenivasa of Tirumalai hills. In fact the lord is in Thirumalai and Thayar is in Thiruchanoor far away from the hills.. There are separate sannadhis for Thayar in many temples. So, the point of “inseparability” should be taken to mean their thoughts are identical and one cannot think in variance with the other. This stand can be proved very easily. Rama was always thinking of Sita only. His anguish is well exhibited in Ramayana that he did not take food properly and did not have sleep properly while Piratti was away in Lanka. Similarly Sita Piratti has also exhibited her feelings that she will not live long if Rama did not recue her quickly. You may refer to Sutra 112 of Sreevachanabhooshanam “Anasooyaikku Piratti arulicheyth vaarthayai smarippathu” Here Piratti informs that her love towards Rama is a natural one. It is not on account of his character etc., as believed by ordinary people. So, their love towards each other was so intimate and mutual that it can be termed, as they are inseparable wherever they are. Now the objection remains that it is not befitting to Piraatti in Jeevas category. Let us examine this position also. From the angle of ‘Thatva” out of 3 options, two are ruled out. The one remaining is this only. Jeeva category. Will it be wrong to include Piratti in this category? Who are Jivas? 1. Nithya soori who have no birth at all. 2. Mumukshus who were jeevathams from some time and later got released from samsara. 3. Other jeevathmas who toil in samsara forever. Piratti will not fit in the cases 2and 3. She is above Nithyasooris and has a unique place. She is Acharya for all jeeva vargam and her Acharyan is Emperuman only. Let us consider Stotra 38 &39 of stotra ratna by Alavandhar wherin the description of Piratti is given. Pirati and Perumal are made for each other and she is being entertained by strange wonderful pleasant leelas. She is seated in Seshaasanam with Emperuman. Again let us consider ‘Chatus sloki” by Alavandar, entire 4 slokas dedicated to Piratti only. She is worshipped by all devathas and their wives are her attendants. Even Emperuman may not know her greatness. The world would not have born with out her consent of merciful glance of her eyes. Emperuman does everything as per her wishes, which he understands automatically and so on. In fact Piratti is ‘swroopa nirupaka bhoothai ‘of Emperuman. When we say’ Jasmine flower’, it means white flower with inseparable pleasant aroma which cannot be seperated from the flower. Again, when say a lighted lamp, the rays coming out of the lamp and the other components of lamp are inseparable. So, Piratti though, physically separate from Emperuman, she is part and parcel of his very existence and holds an exalted position which no body has. In noway, she need be confused with ordinary jeevas toiling in samsara. Adiyen Ramanuja dasan, ===================================== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.