Guest guest Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 The recent postings highlighting the wrongs in the Lord's temples are motivated by a deep love for the Lord, and the pain all good people feel when things are not as they should be. But i fear that in angrily and publicly criticising particular individuals/ groups, our crusaders are doing the wrong thing. Allow me to use my own errors to elaborate. 1) When we get angry, the focus remains on the other person's 'mistake' rather than hearing what God is trying to teach us at that moment in time. Speaking from experience: out of kindness, the Archakas would sometimes allow me to have darsan of the Lord via the 'special-entrance'. One festival day, as i skipped towards the special entrance, i was coarsely rebutted and told to join the que. I felt humiliated- and that too by a peon, in front of all those people. But as i stood in the que, my anger subsided and i could hear the Lord teaching me a lesson:" I, the great Lord of Arangam, love each and every black-robbed, smelly, paan-chewing-red-eyed Ayappa worshiper every bit as much as i love you. Go and wait along with them, my dear but egotectic rangapriya". Similarly, let our anger subside as we ask ourselves: what lesson is the Lord trying to teach me when I feel offended by the 'greed' of the Archakas demanding MY money. . . ? 2) In the face of 'obvious' mis-conduct, it is easy to forget that the wisdom of God transcends that of men. Whilst waiting for darsan of the Lord at a jungle Divyadesa, i found myself next to a chap puffing away on his Ganesh beedies. I looked down my nose at him, oblivious to my padham and smelling only his sin. But to no effect. Even when the doors opened and the Lord blessed us with His darshan, the idiot kept puffing away. Then the Lord taught me an unforgettable lesson. When it was time for the arti (mangalasasanam), the Archaka had run out of matches. 'Any one have a match' the Archaka inquired. No one; except my beedie smoking aparaadhi. The wisdom of God transcends that of men. 3) In recent posts, we have been reminded: "Here the incident of sri kUrath AzhwAn is recalled wherein SrE kurath AzhwAn is initially refused entry into the temple of Lord nam perumAL as he is seen as an associate of Sri RAmAnujA. However, on realising that he is a very learned scholar they permit him inside on the grounds that he is not harmful. SwAmi kUrath AzhwAn returns without entering the temple as he feels that he cannot reach the Lord without dissociating himself with sri RAmAnujA. He prefers srEvaishnavic sambandham rather than the Lord's sambandham. We should also see the seriousness of the words " bhagwadhvishayathOdu -dhEvadhAnthrathOdu vAsiyillai" in the commentary. If we indeed prefer the Lord overlooking srEvaishNavites, worshipping the Lord is deemed equal to that of other deities. The Lord is way above incomparable to other deities. When the same scale is applied, the srEvaishNavites are kept in a very high pedestal above the Lord. The essence is that the Lord should be worshipped only alongwith srEvaishNavites [Thirupavai 15, posting by Swamy V. Padmanabhan]". Too true. Let us remember that even a 'corrupt' Archaka is still a Srivaisnava, and so (by his very presence), is saving us from the sin of 'demigod' worship. 4) Finally, i believe it is no accident that one of the atrocities mentioned in a recent Sholingur post occurred at the Anjaneyar sannidhih. "In the chinna malai ( Anjaneyar Sanithi) There is one senior archaka who is continuing to have some value system but I heard the junior archakas literrally abusing him and calling him by names in front of all the pilgrims". There is a precedent for such abuse. When Swamy Anjaneyar saw the atrocities done by Ravana's ogresses towards Piratti, he too was tempted to 'Give them a piece of his mind'/ 'Let them have it'. But let us remember we are not just Vaisnavas, we are SRI Vaisnavas. Should not Her counsel to Anjaneya be followed by us? Consider: "The cruel atrocities perpetrated by the Rakshasis of Lanka on Sita during her captivity are too well known. And yet did not she plead with Hanuman, on their behalf, even justifying the atrocious conduct, as a matter of mere compliance wih the orders of Ravana , and holding that the Rakshashis who according to Hanuman were sinners (papanam) were, according to her, meritorious (subhanam) and further asserting that there is none above mistakes "na kaschin, na aparaadhyati?" If the mother saw good in evil (dhosha) there is no need to make special mention of her attitude towards the lack of goodness, as such." [srivachanbhusanam, commentary by Sri Manavalamamunighal, trans. Sri Satyamurthi Gwalior]. We have far less justification than Swamy Anjaneya to be angry. The Archakas are abusing either ourselves, or the Lord. Their abuse fades into utter insignificance (in both quality and quantity) aside the ogresses' abuse of Piratti. Everything said and done, let us pause and think how dear these Archakas must be to the Lord. Despite all their apacharas, the Lord continues to keep them close to Him; closer than even nitya-suris could ever dream. The ogresses were forgiven on account of their being bound by Ravana; cannot our Archakas be handled tenderly on account of their being bound by the Lord? Your servant, S. Ramanujadasan. Footnote: if none of the above is convincing, i beg the reader to consider the following: a) By publicly criticising the Archakas, we say to the general public "its o.k. to commit bhaagavad apachara- you too go right ahead". b) If devotees of your high calibre remind the Lord of the mistakes of His caretakers, His anger on them may be more than you bargained for. Is that what you want? c) Has an angry word ever made you change your ways? Or rather has it made you all the more defensive and entrenched in your folly. So too it is with others. Anger is counter productive and only hardens the heart of both giver and taker. d) The Archakas too are human beings, with all the difficulties in life faced by you or me. Who knows what sort of day they've had just before we showed up for darsan? Most Archakas are sincere, devoted and above all- they havent left their Lord (like many of us) to make our fortunes abroad. d) The points about the wrong doings and goings-on in the Lord's temples are valid. But please make your points with love, tenderness, and a concern for the upliftment of all concerned. These Archakas are not outsiders, but our own family members. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 9, 2003 Report Share Posted January 9, 2003 Respected Devotee, My sincere compliments and thanks for putting things back in proper perspective. I too have experienced similar situations, where, at one stage, I have been given the "keys to the temple", and in the next, I am simply another visitor in the crowd. To me, it is a reflection of Sriman Narayana's svatantrIyam. It is He who is the deciding factor in our temple experience, the archakas and other devotees being simply instruments in His Good Actions. I believe that each devotee learns a lesson from such experiences, and with it, is humbled into letting go to the Wonder that He is. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan Mohan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.