Guest guest Posted July 16, 2004 Report Share Posted July 16, 2004 Dear bhagavathas, please accept my humble pranams. I would like to point out some finer nuances of the basic principles of vaishnavism. The basic ideology behind Sri vaishnavism is often interpreted as being wedded to the Infinite,Omnipotent and Omnipresent Almighty. This is none other than Lord Sriman Narayanan. There are two points which i would like to address here: 1)Inside each of us resides a unique shesham of His personality,and this is what lends a unique identity to each and every entity,be it living or non-living. Since each of us share a unique relationship with a unique part of the Lord,can it not be comfortably defined to be one-to-one relationship with Him,just like a husband and wife? 2)If one is uncomfortable with this idea,our relationship with the Infinite can be likened to that between a father and his children. Each child shares a special,one-to-one relationship with his or her father.Who else,but the father,can heed to the child's whims and demands? Assuming that each of us conform to either of these school of thoughts,we find that the basic ideology of Sri vaishnavism is realised. Vaishnavites,by this line of argument,would approach none other Sriman Narayanan in course of their existence. The best we would do is to consider other Gods,with respects to them,as signposts to the Ultimate. This would just stop short of surrendering to them. Of course,that privilege is reserved to Sriman Narayanan, and Him alone!!!!. This is my humble view,and i would be ever open to any other interpretation by learned bhagavathas. With humble pranams, Srinivasa Rajan Ramanuja Dasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.