Digest Number 880

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Balaji:

 

Yes. as others pointed out, Bhattars' vyakyanam is

what you should read. If you have problem in

understanding vyakyanams/sanskrit/manipravalam etc..

(like I have), the best thing to do would be to listen

to Sri. Velukkudi Krishnan Swami's kalakshepam on Sri.

Vishnu Sahasranaamam. There a total of 15 MP3 CDs

(total about 125 hours or so) that have been recorded

during Swami's kalakshepam. These CDs should be on

sale at www.vedics.net

 

It is Bhagawan's nirhethua Krupa that sent scholars

like Sri. Krishnan swami to dispel agyana in the minds

of people like me. Vyakyanam books are a good source

but to me the best and the easiest alternative would

be to listen to upanyasams/vyakyanams.

 

adiyen RAmAnuja DAsan,

Murali

 

>

> Message: 1

> Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:48:36 -0400 (EDT)

> Balaji Sundarrajan

> <bsundarrajansrivilliputtur

> Please apologise this siruvan - and please

> shed some light !!!

>

>

> Shri :

>

> Shri kaarimaaran swami thiruvadikalae saranam.

>

> dear bhagavatas

>

>

>

> Pranaams.

>

>

>

> adiyaen is having trouble in understanding our

> almighty

>

> adiyaen siriyaen ,eliyaen.... i am still a trainee

> in srivaishnavism philosophy...

>

>

>

> I hope you will not get angry with my words. vaasaka

> dhosham santhavyaha...

>

> almost 30% of Vishnu sahasranaamam is saying that

>

> our almighty has no form ,but he is big,great , he

> encompasses everything (in the universe)

>

> & he has no matter within himself(like a bliss)

>

> to quote randomly some samples .... one or two ...

>

> aneka roopa roopaaya ( therefore he is formless ..

> he is visible in pluralities)

>

> Guhyo , gabheero , gahano...

>

> => ( he has no form , he is formless , therefore he

> can not be conceived with our

>

> senses !!!)

>

> Ajo durmarashana-saasthaaa ( he can not be attacked

> with any weapons - he is like a

>

> shadow , he is unborn in the womb...)

>

>

>

> Amoorthy ranakocinyo.... (he is formless)

>

>

>

> swayambhu... ( he is a total one father of universe

> )

>

> anirdesyavapur-vishnu -veero nantho.. - therefore he

> has no form

>

> Please be informed that every sanskrit naama of our

> almighty word has as

>

> many as 3 explanations. but in total they stress

> these ...

>

> Kaarimaaran (Ji)swami (Our Lone torchbearer of this

> srivaishnavam,My only hope of moksham )

>

> also says the same thing. Mananunar valavilan ...

> pori-unar vavaiyilan (1.1.2) - he

>

> can not be conceived !!!

>

> Contradictary starts here for me !!! (how can i

> reach someone who is formless ? )

>

> ========================

>

> His Formful explanation.

>

> ================

>

> Given this case ,why all the other descriptions say

> that he has four hands, 5 aayudhas, lotus eyed ,

> with a shri vatsa mark on his chest , he has

> vaijayante (always fresh ) maala ,lotus feets,

>

> lotus hands, beautiful limbs , soundarya thirumeni ,

> blue bodied , white face

>

> (kathir mathiyam pol mukathaan) - ,tall glittering

> crown

>

>

>

> vaikuntam is a (unreachable) place in the universe

> with milky ocean which is called as

>

> parama padam (highest abode) so called our moksham(

> our final destination)

>

> what is the situation of those who have already

> attained salvation. ? how can they attain

>

> formless salvation (bliss).

>

> Does athma has eyes ? i am aware that athma has (&

> may carry ) knowledge during salvation.

>

> how can our aathma can see him without eyes.

>

> am i imagining my aathma like a dust in the air --

> (anur-brihat..krisha-sthoolaa)

>

> Please clarify , and apologise if i have confused

> you ?

>

>

>

> Adiyaen ..(Half baked Bread ..)

>

> (Muthal Thaai) Sadagopan Daasan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New and Improved Mail - Send 10MB messages!