Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 pranaam, I have another question. Does conciousness of a person reside with the soul? If so then if the soul passes from one living organism to another, does it retain the awareness of the lord with it or is the awareness of god only there when the soul takes up the human body? We humans have built temples etc, to worship god. Is there any such behaviour among animals? Why does it seem that only humans are aware of his presence (or atleast think about him)? Shouldn't the soul feel the same attraction when it is in the body of an animal? I had not joined the group when there was a discussion about TTD. But according to my feelings, the worst part of TTD is not its expansion plans. It is the bribe that people take/give inside the sanctum sanctorum itself to stay for some more time inside. It is a shame that people resort to such behaviour in the presence of the lord. As if it matters if you stand there for a few second more. Regarding the previous mail about soul and consequence of accidents, if we all agree that whatever happens to us is by perumal's grace, then where does the question of accidents arise? Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2004 Report Share Posted October 23, 2004 Swamin, The chetana shakti is with the soul alone and it is carried forward to the next janma's. dasan/raghavan Krishna Iyengar <krishna_iy wrote: pranaam, I have another question. Does conciousness of a person reside with the soul? If so then if the soul passes from one living organism to another, does it retain the awareness of the lord with it or is the awareness of god only there when the soul takes up the human body? We humans have built temples etc, to worship god. Is there any such behaviour among animals? Why does it seem that only humans are aware of his presence (or atleast think about him)? Shouldn't the soul feel the same attraction when it is in the body of an animal? I had not joined the group when there was a discussion about TTD. But according to my feelings, the worst part of TTD is not its expansion plans. It is the bribe that people take/give inside the sanctum sanctorum itself to stay for some more time inside. It is a shame that people resort to such behaviour in the presence of the lord. As if it matters if you stand there for a few second more. Regarding the previous mail about soul and consequence of accidents, if we all agree that whatever happens to us is by perumal's grace, then where does the question of accidents arise? Krishna azhwAr emberumAnAr jeeyAr thiruvadigalE saranam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2004 Report Share Posted October 23, 2004 ramanuja, "Krishna Iyengar" <krishna_iy@i...> wrote: NamaskArams. > > I had not joined the group when there was a discussion about TTD. >But according to my feelings, the worst part of TTD is not its expansion > plans. It is the bribe that people take/give inside the sanctum >sanctorum itself to stay for some more time inside. It is a shame that people >resort to such behaviour in the presence of the lord. > > Krishna Can people resort to such behavior in the absence of the Lord? If so, where? Dasan Vishnu PS: Note from Moderator: Sriman Vishnu is trying to say that such behaviour as noted by Sri Krishna as accourring inside Sanctum in Thirumala is to be avoided everywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.