Guest guest Posted November 26, 2005 Report Share Posted November 26, 2005 non-living; between God and the non-living and finally, between two non-living objects. These differences together are called the "pancha-bhEda", meaning the five differences. 5) Moksham (salvation) is when the soul realizes the joys of its own nature 6) Moksham can be obtained only through bhakthi. Sri Anandatheertha, who is also glorified as mAdhwAchArya, wrote commentaries on the BrahmasUtra based on the tattvavAdic philosophy. Srivaishnavism is based on vishishta-adwAitha, (some scholars also call it, vishishtA-dwaitha), meaning there is a "special" relationship between God and Soul. First of all, God is the supreme being, who has all the auspicios gunAs (qualities), has a form (nArAyanA), both the living and the non-living are His attributes. Sri Mukundan SwAmin's posting clearly explains the philosophical stand of the Srivaishnava philosophy, expounded by Sri rAmAnuja. For all practical purposes, some of the differences between the Madhwa and Srivaishnava Philosophies are: 1) Nature of mukthi: THe madhwA explanation for moksham seems to be similar to what the SrivaishnavAs refer to as "kaivalya" (enjoying one's soul, as against serving bhagawAn in vaikunthA) 2) Demi-God worship: This is a major difference. The mAdhwAs have strong emphasis on demigod worship (understanding being they'd relieve a soul from the bad karmic reactions, in order to serve Lord Sriman nArAyanA better). For the SrivaishnavAs, the Lord's feet are the only refuge. 3) the gradation of the souls: mAdhwAs grade the living souls. For the Srivaishnavas, there is no difference between any two souls. 4) Casteism: MadhwA sampradayam is highly ritualistic. Very rarely do we see people of lower castes following mAdhwa sampradayam. Srisampradayam is universal (although kula-dharmam should be honored; for example brahmins should perform sandhya-vandanam, but it is just the duty, not the means to reach God), as shown by Sri rAmAnujar and SwAmi piLLai lOkAchAryan 5) MadhwAs stress on bhakti and human effort, whereas Srisampradayam focusses on prapatti and God's grace. I would be grateful if the learned scholars can correct any of the wrongs in this post. adiyEn dAsan, kidAmbi soundararajan. AzhwAr emperumAnAr jeeyar thiruvadigaLE Saranam.Parthasarathi BR <brp.sarathi > wrote: Dear Sri Raju Dwaita by very meaning it is two i,e jeewathma & Paramatma No Question of it being one andclearly it is two ONLY But SriRamanujacharyas Vishta Advaitha says there is ONLY ONE i,e Paramatma and all jeewathma ultimately gets Ikkyam with Paramathma-- GETS Mingled An eg cud be Apple fruit & its skin Can we say Apple fruit inside is Different from its outer skin-- NO But at the same time Apple fruit & the skin are two BUT when U say apple U mean one only BOTH its Skin & Fruit-- this is our Sampradayam I hope ADIYEN has tried to Explain a bit Surely Respected members will thro more LIGHT Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan BRParthasarathi AANDAL THIRUVADIGALE SARANAM On 11/25/05, R.B.Maliger <raju.maliger > wrote: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"> Dear fellow SriVaishnavas, Namaste! I wish to know the major differences between VishisTaadvaita (Sri RAmAnujAchArya) and Dvaita (Sri MadhvAchArya) philosophies. Can someone answer to this question? Hari OM, Raju Maliger Azhvar EmberumAnAr JeeyAr ThiruvadigalE Saranam http://www.vedics.net ! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "ramanuja" on the web. To from this group, send an email to: ramanuja Your use of is subject to the -- Regards B.R.Parthasarathi Visit your group "ramanuja" on the web. To from this group, send an email to: ramanuja Your use of is subject to the Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 to Abeda and Beda sruthis.Adwaitha: "NOT TWO" [Non-Dualism]=====================The main proponent of this philosophy is Adi Sankara AcharyaAccording to this philosophy the jeevathama and paramathmaare not two, but they are one.They do not accept validity of the Beda srutisThey accept Abeda srutis as the authority.Dwaitha: "TWO" [Dualism]===============The main proponent of this philosophy is Madhva AcharyaAccording to this philosophy the jeevathama and paramathmaare two and NOT one.They do not accept validity of the ABeda srutisThey accept Beda srutis as the authority.Visishta-Adwaitha: "NOT TWO" in a Special way.===================== [Qualified Non-Dualism] Visishtasya -AdwaithamThe main proponent of this philosophy is Ramanuja AcharyaWith the help of Ghataka srutis, both Beda and Abeda sruthisare explained. All the passages of Vedas are taken as authority.Visishta-Adwaitham is the foundation on which the traditions of SriVaishnavam is founded. This appeals to both reason and tofaith, to the intellect and the heart. It is one of the most joyoussystems, with a caring and personal relationship with the Lord, SrimanNarayana. The ultimate goal in this system iseternal bliss and kainkariyam (selfless service) to Sriman-Narayana.The chief doctrines of this system are classified under:1: Tattva 2: Hita 3: Purusartha and 4: Virodhi.(we might need to go in to details on this in fuure posts)The Sarira-Athma-Bhava (Sarira-Sariri Bhava) is animportant aspect of Visitadwaitha.Applying Sri Ramanuja's definition of Sarira, all Srutis can be explained: "Any substance which a sentient soul is capable of completely supporting, controlling for its own purpose and which stands to the soul in an entirely subordinate realtion, is the body of that soul"This definition of Sarira, makes every other definition of other schools incomplete, and difficult to apply on certain situations.The BrhadAranyaka passages of the Antaryami Brahman quoted by Sri Yamunacharya at the end of his work "Atmasidhhi" explains this point:"yah prithivyam tishtan.....yasya prthivi sariram""yasyapah sariram""yasya Atma Sariram".....Sri Ramanuja quotes from Sri Vishna Purana, in support"Jagat Sarvam Sariram te""Yadambu vaisnavah kayah, tato vipra vasundhara"The entire universe of sentient and insentient entities is only a prakara (mode) of the supreme.Again in Vedartha Sanraha sri Ramanuja emphasizes the point"eka vijnanena sarva vijnana pratinjna sarvasya tadAtmakatvenaiva satyatve sidhhihayati"==================================================will continue this thread if there is a need/ interestfor Vedanta based explanations of Adi Shankara, Madhwa and Sri Ramanuja. (re: Creation, Maya, purpose, goal, etc.)Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan, Mukundan VPSources:Sri Vishnu Purana of Sri ParasaSri Bhasya of Sri RamanujaSri VedarthaSangraha of Sri RamanujaSri Vishnucittiya of EngalAzhvan (by Dr. MA Ranganayaki) India Matrimony: Find your partner now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.