Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Historical musings & conjectures

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

For years I have wondered about the historical reasons for the

universality of Ganesh. I am more of a myth maker than an historian, so I hav

no idea if my cnjectures are valid. I thought I would post them here & see if

anyone has corrections or additions to my little musings.

 

The way I figure it, Hinduism was once a whole bunch of seperate

religions which sometimes ignored one another & sometimes competed where their

spheres of influence overlapped. Travellers spread stories & myths. The

seperate religions began to intermingle.

 

Egypt was similar in dim past. Egypt had central government & the

Pharoh (gog-king incarnate) as a unifying force. Many seperate gods became

hyphanated composit gods like Amon-Ra. In India, a different approach was

taken. No central god-king. Instead, the god everyone loves -- Ganesh.

Correct me if I am mis-remembering here, but isn't one of Ganesh's titles the

"uniter of attributes"?

 

So now we have Ganesh's image in temples of all the other gods &

godeesses. We have GGanesh being addresses at all sectarian rites. Ganesh is

(I believe) responsible for preventing many major religious wars & much

bloodshed.

 

The process continues today beyond the Hindu religion. Here in New

Orleans, I know several Catholics who keep a small statu of Ganesh in their

pocket or on their desk at work. Mardi Gra celebration down here honors

Ganesh along with just about every other myth & deity imaginable. I am not

sure what the rules about attachments are on this e-list, but I am attaching a

pic of one the the cups thrown from floats here at Mardi Gras. Gashesh is

pictured on the cup surrounded by many different power symbols & the caption is

"Crescendos of Creation".

 

Alobar

Attachment: (application/octet-stream) Ganesh cup.JPG [not stored]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> The way I figure it, Hinduism was once a whole bunch of

seperate religions which sometimes ignored one another & sometimes

competed where their spheres of influence overlapped. Travellers

spread stories & myths. The seperate religions began to

intermingle.

>

> Egypt was similar in dim past. Egypt had central

government & the Pharoh (gog-king incarnate) as a unifying force.

Many seperate gods became hyphanated composit gods like Amon-Ra.

In India, a different approach was taken. No central god-king.

Instead, the god everyone loves -- Ganesh. Correct me if I am mis-

remembering here, but isn't one of Ganesh's titles the "uniter of

attributes"?

>

> So now we have Ganesh's image in temples of all the other

gods & godeesses. We have GGanesh being addresses at all sectarian

rites. Ganesh is (I believe) responsible for preventing many major

religious wars & much bloodshed.

 

 

************

 

Dear Alobar:

 

I feel this might be a real pattern. For me, as a Christian, who is

used to Yeshua (Jesus) as an incarnation of God, I can't help but see

a parallel to your theory of Egyptian gods and also Ganesh. Before

Yeshua came, the Jews and the Gentiles (non-Jews) were separate. The

Jews considerd the Gentiles unholy. When Yeshua came, he taught that

God's family was made up of all men, and there was a uniting force in

his teachings that brought together all races and nations in his

message, not just Israel. Here I am talking about Yeshua himself and

not the confusing legacy of Christianity, which does not always

reflect his teachings. I think that Ganesh and Yeshua resemble each

other in many ways. One of their mutual titles is Ganapati, or Lord

of the Multitudes/Lord of Hosts. I can't get that out of my head.

Just today I thought of another way they are alike. Ganesh was

created by Parvati and Yeshua was born from a virgin. Each of them

had an unusual 'fatherless' origin. Also, I see both of these persons

as associated with joy. So in those ways I feel that your pattern

might be substantiated. It also seems that the older gods were more

shadowy and tribal, and that the new gods seem to take on more

specific form and pull people together more. I still like what Ananda

Yogi said about Unity in Diversity though. Also, a closing note would

be that I am not trying to blend Ganesh with Amon-Ra or Yeshua or any

other image of God. They are not the same.

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...