Guest guest Posted November 25, 2005 Report Share Posted November 25, 2005 25. 11. 2005 NEPAL: The Political Parties reach the "point of no return"- Update 78 by Dr. S. Chandrasekharan Since the sacking of Deuba in October 2002, we have always looked at the developments in Nepal in the frame work of a triangular equilibrium, with the King, the Maoists and the Political parties at the three ends. Of the three forces, the weakest was the seven party alliance. The political parties by their sheer greed, bad governance and internal rivalry made a mockery of democracy and since the middle of 1998, their cadres have not even ventured out of the Kathmandu valley and other major towns for fear of the Maoists who are now all over the rural areas. This is not to justify the action of the King who now rules outside the 1990 Constitution. It has been our view that the best that should have happened was the King and the political parties to reconcile their positions and make a joint effort to combat the greater menace of the Maoists. Instead we find that the Maoists and the agitating political parties have come to an agreement to bring in absolute democracy (whatever it means) by "focussing their attack against the autocratic monarchy." This is sad but what surprises us is that this has the blessings of India with support from JNU bred analysts, notwithstanding denials from official sources. Now the 12 Point Agreement announced simultaneously by the Seven party Alliance and the Maoists on 22nd November: A rough translation of the twelve point agreement is given in Appendix II. Briefly the agreement highlights the following. 1. Peace and Prosperity of the country is impossible without ending autocracy and establishing absolute monarchy. All anti regressive forces have decided to focus their attack against the autocratic monarchy independently. 2. The seven party alliance would go for a road map by reinstatement of parliament first, followed by formation of an all party government with full executive power, talks with the Maoists and election to the constituent assembly in that order. The Maoists on the other hand, would prefer a road map with the formation of an interim government formed after a national conference of agitating parties which then will oversee an election to the constituent assembly. 3. While both parties are committed to a constituent assembly, the Maoists are committed to move into a "new" peaceful political line. Once the autocratic monarchy is ended ( not the monarchy as such!), the arms of both the RNA and the Maoists will be supervised by the UN or a dependable international body to ensure free and fair election to the constituent assembly. Both parties expect involvement of a credible international community in the dialogue process. 4. CPN-M ( Maoists) is committed to competitive multi party system, fundamental rights of the people, human rights, rule of law, democratic principles and values and to act accordingly. 5. Maoists will create a conducive atmosphere to all leaders and cadres of democratic forces and people to return to their homes and would return the physical properties and houses seized unjustifiably. People will be allowed to take part in political activities without hindrance. 6. The Maoists have agreed to criticise itself for the past mistakes with promise not to repeat them. 7. The Political Parties of the alliance will also not repeat the mistakes after they have had an introspection. 8. Human rights principles and freedom of press will be fully respected during the peace process. 9. The Municipal and Parliamentary Polls will be boycotted and made unsuccessful. 10. Both sides have expressed their commitment to protect their independence, national unity, and sovereignty and safeguarding geographical integrity. They have also declared their responsibility to maintain cordial relationship with all nations of the world, especially the neighbours India and China. 11. Both sides called on all to actively support the people's movement launched under the common agreement based on democracy, peace, prosperity, social transformation, and the nation's sovereignty. 12. Past incidents will be probed and action will be taken against guilty. Comments: * Though both sides have the same objective of going in for elections to constituent assembly, they have not given up their respective road maps- The political parties want to undo the first knot by reinstating the sacked parliament while the Maoists are sticking to their stand of a national conference of democratic forces, interim government and then election to the constituent assembly. The most significant development is that the Nepali Congress has finally and clearly opted for elections to a constituent assembly. * While the ongoing agitation will be intensified, the Maoists and the seven party alliance will work independently to work for an end to autocratic monarchy. It means that there is no alliance and no joint action. It is not clear from the wording whether the political parties agree with the Maoists that the fight is against autocratic monarchy or monarchy itself. * Nepalese political parties as also the media from both India and Nepal were quick to come to the conclusion that the Maoists have shown their willingness to join the political mainstream by laying down their arms to a UN body or to any other neutral institution. The twelve point agreement does not give this impression. All it says is that the arms of both the Royal Nepal Army and that of the Maoists will be "supervised" by the UN or a dependable international body. * There is a challenge thrown to the King and his government that the municipal elections and later the parliamentary elections will not be allowed. It is our assessment that the municipal elections could be conducted though not the parliamentary one, if done in phases. * For the first time in the history of Nepal, outside powers other than India is being involved in what is still an internal problem. For quite some time the UN has been interested in getting involved and now the 12 point agreement opens the doors not only for the UN but also other "dependable" international bodies. * Many analysts in Nepal see the announcement as the "end game" of the unfortunate conflict that has been raging since 1996. To us it looks that it is just the beginning. They have identified the common target- here the King and common objective of elections to a constituent assembly. They are not willing to go for joint action or a working alliance. The Maoists will not lay down their arms and the full blow of counter action by the security forces would perhaps come on the poor hapless cadres of the seven party alliance. * The most serious flaw in this agreement is that it completely ignores the monarchy and its influence on the people and the security forces. Despite regular and systematic brainwashing of students, teachers and the people by the Maoists in the country side, monarchy is still a factor to reckon with in the rural areas and even the middle class and the elite in the townships. While Maoists have been dominating the country side, they are not in a position to over run the valley and thus there is no military solution either way. If the idea is to pressurise the King to give in by this declaration, knowing his nature, these would only harden his stand further. There will only be more bloodshed and more instability. * But the King is equally responsible for throwing the agitating parties into the arms of the Maoists. The midnight raids, house arrests, humiliating former ministers including the Prime minister, media ordinance and now the code of conduct for the NGOs have all irretrievably ruled out any political accommodation with the democratic forces. By removing the buffer and taking all powers to himself, he has exposed monarchy to all violations of law. It was strange and rather amusing to hear the Attorney General arguing in the case against the Royal Commission on corruption control that "All orders issued by the King are constitutional since he is a devotee of the Hindu religion and the Constitution has given him special responsibility." In the same case at another point the Attorney general said that the executive authority rests with the King as there is no Parliament and therefore the advice and consent of Cabinet ministers mandatory under Article 35(2) are no longer relevant! The Indian Shadow: In the SAARC summit, the Indian Prime Minister met the King of Nepal and media reports indicate that the PM underlined to the King the importance of restoring multi party democracy in Nepal and the need to take concrete steps in this regard. The King is said to have reaffirmed his commitment to multiparty democracy and said that he was prepared to work with the political parties towards this objective. It is not clear whether the Prime Minister mentioned about India's continuing interest in the Constitutional monarchy. In response to the twelve point agreement between the Maoists and the seven party alliance, the official spokesman on 23rd November said that India has urged the institution of monarchy to work together with the political parties. If this was the Indian Government's position, what had happened in Delhi and later in Kathmandu with the issuance of the 12 point agreement between the Maoists and the democratic parties to fight the "autocratic monarchy", there would hardly be any space for the King to work with the political parties. The Government of India cannot deny as to what was going on. Witness the following- * Madhav Nepal, of CPN (UML) came to Delhi for a "medical check" upon 23 rd October and was meeting Indian leaders of all hues from Prime Minister downwards till the 11th November. * G.P. Koirala reached Delhi for a medical check up again( he had one a little earlier) on 10th November and Madhav Nepal met him before he left for Kathmandu on 11th November. * Madhav Nepal visited Delhi again twice before the twelve point agreement was released to the Press on 23rd November, 2005. * While Madhav Nepal was in Delhi, Bam Dev Gautam of his party told the Press that his leader will meeting the Maoists at an undisclosed place. ( referred to in our earlier update) * On 18th November, Madhav Nepal confirmed to the BBC that the dialogue with the Maoists had opened and also admitted that the representatives of seven party Alliance et Maoists leaders to a joint protest against the King. * On 19th November, G.P.Koirala admitted that he had telephonic talks with Maoists leaders. * There was a specific report in the Indian media that senior politicians of Nepal's seven party alliance met top Maoists leaders in Delhi on 17th and 18th of November. * The agreement between the two sides was released to the Press on 22nd November, after the two leaders, G.P.Koirala and Madhav Nepal return to Kathmandu. Whether there was a personal meeting between the seven party alliance leaders and the Maoists is beside the point. But what is significant is that the discussions on the agreement have perhaps taken place with New Delhi's knowledge, acquiescence and blessings. What could have moved India to a change of course from getting the King and the political parties together and instead getting the Maoists and the democratic parties together? Perhaps the King's uncompromising actions against the political parties and worse, using the China card to pressurise India (SAARC summit etc) could have resulted in this change. If one is to describe the situation in Nepal in one sentence, it is that "it is in a mess." Maoist related Incidents: The informal cease fire is still holding barring minor incidents. Though the three-month cease fire declared by the Maoists would end on December 2, there are indications that it would be extended by another month. Though the government has not officially reciprocated the cease fire, it has acknowledged its existence in an international forum. (In the sixth conference of the Ministers of Information of Non Aligned Countries on 21 November ). A list of incidents since October 10th is given in Appendix I. Appendix II gives a rough translation of the full text of the 12 point agreement between the agitating seven party alliance and CPN. (M)- the Maoists. Appendix I. Incidents Date Incidents October 2005 15. Four Maoists were killed in a security operation at Beltari in Morang District. 18. At least 400 family members of security personnel of Kathmandu demanded that either the government declare a cease fire or discharge their kin from the services. 30. The son of former Prime Minister Lokendra Bahadur Chand was kidnapped from Bashuling Sugar mill in Kailali. He was later released on being assured that he would pay up the dues to his workers. 31. Two Oil tankers heading for Dipayal from Kailali's Sahajpur area were seized by the Maoists. November 2005. 06. Nine Maoists were arrested from Jhapa area by the local Police when they were collecting donations. 15. The All Nepal National Independent Students's Union ® affiliated to the Maoists shut down the government run schools in Dharan in protest against the government decision to hand over the schools to the communities. 55 High School students from in and around Pokhara were abducted by the Maoists for indoctrination. They were returned later. 19. 56 teachers and students abducted from the western region were released after a week. 20. Two security personnel were killed at Kavre Phulchowk by Maoists in an ambush. 21 Security forces and Maoists clashed at Sapsukhola in Khotang. Four of the Maoists were killed and twenty more were injured. 22 Over a thousand strong crowd demonstrated at Dipayal demanding the extension of cease fire. Appendix II 12 Point Agreement 1. At present all Nepalese desire peace, democracy, prosperity, social progress and independent and sovereign Nepal. To achieve this goal, we fully agree that the autocratic monarchy is the main obstacle. We are in clear agreement that peace and prosperity of the country is quite impossible without ending autocracy and establishing absolute democracy. Hence, all anti-regressive forces have come to an agreement to focus their attack against the autocratic monarchy independently, and bring it to an end by intensifying the ongoing democratic movement across the country. 2. The seven-party alliance is fully convinced that sovereignty and executive right of the people can be reestablished through the reinstatement of parliament (on the basis of people's movement); formation of all-party government with full executive power; talks with the Maoists and election to the constituent assembly. Whereas CPN-M believes that people's sovereignty can be established through formation of an interim government formed after a national conference of agitating democratic forces, which will oversee the election to the constituent assembly [This is the only point of divergence, so to speak, between the seven-party alliance and the rebels]. Both of us agree to continue negotiation and dialogue to reach common agreement in these procedural issues. However, we have agreed that people's movement is the only way to attain our agreed goals. 3. The nation has demanded constructive end of the present armed conflict and establishment of a lasting peace. Thus, we are fully committed to end autocratic monarchy and establish lasting peace through election to constituent assembly. In this regard, the CPN-M expresses its commitment to move into new peaceful political line. After bringing the autocratic monarchy to an end, we have agreed that the arms of both the Royal Nepalese Army and the Maoists will be supervised by the United Nations or a dependable international body to ensure free and fair election to the constituent assembly. Both parties have also agreed to accept the results of the elections. We also expect an involvement of a credible international community in the dialogue process. 4. CPN-M has expressed firm commitment to acceptance of competitive multiparty system, fundamental rights of the people, human rights, and rule of law and democratic principles and values and to act accordingly. 5. CPN-M has agreed to create conducive atmosphere to allow all leaders and cadres affiliated to other democratic forces and common people, who were displaced from home during the conflict, to return to their respective places with full respect. The Maoists have also agreed to return the houses and physical properties of people and party cadres seized unjustifiably. People will be allowed to take part in political activities without any hindrance. 6. CPN-M has also agreed to criticize itself for its past mistakes and has expressed commitment not to repeat them in future. 7. Parties will introspect on their past mistakes and they have expressed commitment not to repeat such mistakes in future. 8. During the peace process human rights principles and freedom of press will be fully respected. 9. The municipal and parliamentary polls which have been pushed forward with the malicious intention of deceiving people and the international community, and to legitimize the king's autocratic and unconstitutional rule will be boycotted and made unsuccessful. 10. People, representatives of people and political parties are the real bulwark of nationalism. We are committed to protecting our independence, national unity and sovereignty, and safeguarding geographical integrity. It is our responsibility to maintain cordial relationship with all nations in the world--especially with our neighbors, India and China--based on the principle of peaceful co- existence. We appeal to all patriotic Nepalis to be wary of the Mandale brand of nationalism preached by the monarch and his sycophants to protect their rule and interest. We also appeal to the Nepali people and international community to provide help to our Loktantrik movement. 11. We also appeal to all people, civil society members, professional communities, various sister organizations, journalists and intellectuals to participate actively in the people's peaceful movement launched under the common agreement based on democracy, peace, prosperity, social transformation, and the nation's sovereignty. 12. The parties and Maoists have also agreed to probe into past incidents and take action against the guilty. In future, if any problem occurs among political parties, the concerned high level leaders shall discuss and settle the issues amicably through dialogue. http://www.saag.org/notes3/note281.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.