Guest guest Posted May 7, 2002 Report Share Posted May 7, 2002 I do shiatsu so I think of the body map as something similar to the Chinese meridian system. When I do yoga, I also think of the energy flow along the meridian lines with special access to that energy in certain points. I would never teach in such complexity, but the meridians often make so much sense as I experience a kundalini kriya. For me, they just pop out and I can feel the energy flowing down them. My question is "is it wrong to teach with this type of non-kundalini information? It's not authoritative since it is just my experience. Also, we aren't supposed to add anything to the kriya. I don't intentionally ever change the kriya. But I do mention the meridians when they are obvious to me. This means that for example, the point on my foot that I grab might be more specific that what is shown in the text. Or I may emphasize the stretch along a specific meridian when I know that I am having trouble with energy flow there. What happens is I become more specific than the textbook would suggest. I think that the beauty of the pure teaching is their simplicity and the possiblity that different people would use the kriya in different ways. Being as specific as I am is not intended to limit, but I can see where it might have that effect. For me personally, it is a focusing "map" and a tool for analysis. When I am teaching just a few people, which is normal for me, then seeing the merian energy flow in them is also very useful (from my perspective) in instructing them. I don't think I could do it as effectively with a large class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.