Guest guest Posted July 25, 2003 Report Share Posted July 25, 2003 There are so many Internet articles about weakness of the diaphragm in asthma and other diseases. Many praise the healthy effects of exercises for restoring diaphragm function. Good diaphragm action is important for meditation and it seems one key to kundalini yoga. Recent research on sleep emphasizes the significance of diaphragmatic breathing in parts of normal sleep, namely the stages with rapid eye movement (REM) and dreams. The first of these stages may last ten minutes and the last one 1 hour, according to one article. Studies state that if there is a weak diaphragm action at these times, respiration and hence oxygen supply will be compromised. It is therefore possible to imagine training proper diaphragm action as a sort of natural road back to health without any side effects. Whether this is really the case or not could conceivably be tried out with the support of a good doctor to check whether health does objectively improve. The commonest method of getting the diaphragm going for medical or health reasons is lying on one's back with a weight on the belly and moving the weight up and down. Significantly, this type of exercise is not recommended in original Indian yoga. Furthermore, the importance of a sniff or other restriction of nose breathing is omitted. For singers there is less attention paid to separately training the diaphragm. However some texts speak of taking a sharp sniff to get the feel of the workings of the diaphragm. In Chinese and Japanese breathing exercises attention is paid to how far the diaphragm moves down on each inspiration (so-called tantien, tanden or hara). Then of course there is the fact that in some languages the diaphragm is named the "laugh muscle". The Ancient Greeks are often reported to have thought of it as the seat of the soul, but actual texts stating this are hard to find. Modern western medicine tends to completely and utterly misunderstand the significance of nose resistance in breathing and more especially in breathing exercises. The nose is only for "humidifying, warming and cleaning the breath" is the standard pontification in textbooks. More tragically there is a tendency for books on yoga to "explain pranayama in scientific terms" and hence make nonsense of it. In my copy of the "Science of Breath" (Swami Rama, Rudolph Ballentine and Alan Hymes) the short chapter on "nose function and energy" completely ignores nasal resistance to airflow. With this supposed enlightenment folks can say that alternate nostril breathing and ujjayi are mere superstition. A significant trouble with doing diaphragmatic exercises is managing a sort of sniff resistance effect. Modern research (see Verin E. et al. see Eur J Appl Physiol, (2001) 593-598, full text available via MedLine) shows that sniff effects provide an unsuspectedly high negative pressure, which may be used to systematically influence the diaphragm as opposed to other muscles. In order to meet the requirement for more foolproof diaphragm exercises there is the method reported to be used in Germany for at least two years. In it a finger is placed between the lips to form a gap between it and them. The student then vigorously and sharply breathes in so that the cheeks are pulled in a bit. The resulting artificial "sniff" has a powerful effect on the diaphragm. Once one has localized the diaphragm, training it may then proceed with slower inhales through the gap so as to exercise the diaphragm to the exclusion of other muscles in the chest. When breathing strictly diaphragmatically, doing an inhale at all becomes is substantially or totally dependent on the choking effect of the gap. If the gap is widened during an inhale past a certain point, the inhale is disrupted. Breathing diaphragmatically through a 1" flexible tube placed in the mouth will show that a finger has to be placed partly over the outer end of the pipe and it is then interesting to see what variations are needed during an inhale. The effect of a breath taken through the gap between the lips and the finger is in a way much more powerful than one taken through the nose. It may be "focussed" on the chakra at the base of the back with a stronger effect. Regards, Richard Friedel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 26, 2003 Report Share Posted July 26, 2003 Thanks for the reminder, Richard. There are more nerves in the gut than in the spinal column. It makes sense to give this area a lot of attention. It's not just a Body, it's an Adventure. Sat Nam, Dharam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.