Guest guest Posted December 29, 2001 Report Share Posted December 29, 2001 Om Amriteshwariye Namah, During last discussion with DayaAmrita Swamiji, we were told to you the Discrimination - so i decided to contemplate and can you please help me in understanding its meaning further? 1. What do you think when someone mentions you to use discrimination? 2. Is discrimination same as investigation for you? 3. Does it involve going to the root cause as well as origin of the subject / object in hand? How deep you go? Thanks for your contribution, Om Amriteshwariye Namah :ekanath Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 30, 2001 Report Share Posted December 30, 2001 No doubt he refers to discrimination between the Self, the Paramatman, the Real, the unchanging and the continually changing (everything else). If something begins and ends, it belongs in the second category. That which is aware of what begins and ends -- look toward That which is your real self. It's the drik-srishya-viveka, discrimination between the seer and the seen, between the self the subject and object. When you notice these psychic bombardments, instead of letting your mind go on a rampage either of emotional reaction or jumping from task to task by "investigating," just notice that the intrusion is something you know and is separate from you, the knower. When your mind wants to go on a rampage of understandable emotional reaction, just notice that the reaction is also something, an object, that you know and see the self as distinct. Aikya Ammachi, "ekanath" <ekanath> wrote: > Om Amriteshwariye Namah, > > During last discussion with DayaAmrita Swamiji, we were told to > you the Discrimination - so i decided to contemplate and can you > please help me in understanding its meaning further? > > 1. What do you think when someone mentions you to use discrimination? > > 2. Is discrimination same as investigation for you? > > 3. Does it involve going to the root cause as well as origin of the > subject / object in hand? How deep you go? > > > > > Thanks for your contribution, > > Om Amriteshwariye Namah > > :ekanath Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 31, 2001 Report Share Posted December 31, 2001 > No doubt he refers to discrimination between the Self Discrimination, first of all, requires concentration, or should I say "concentrated awareness", or paying attention. Many times people don't discriminate because they don't actually look at the facts, but go with a "feeling". Discriminating between more subtle levels such as the seer and the seen, etc, assumes you're already skilled in discriminating grosser levels. That's what I tried to show in my taste test example, going to more subtle levels of taste or subtle quality that would affect taste such as temperature. Just like in meditation, if you're unable to concentrate on gross objects (photo, etc.) then it's harder to concentrate on subtle objects such as sounds or concepts. > 1. What do you think when someone mentions you to use > discrimination? An intellectual process comparing two or more items, or recognizing the differences between two+ objects, going deeper and deeper into subtle levels and exploring necessary tangents. It takes more energy to discriminate than to wait for guidance or to go with a feeling. > 2. Is discrimination same as investigation for you? Investigation can involve discrimination, but usually consists more of fact-finding rather than decision making, of which discrimination is mostly used for. Investigation can be a part of disrimination, if you're "investigating" the possible results of a pending action. > 3. Does it involve going to the root cause as well as origin of the > subject / object in hand? How deep you go? It all depends on what the goal of your discrimination is, and your level of committment to getting the best result. Watching a movie 100 times, you'll obviously discriminate more subtle details than just watching it a few times, although someone paying more attention may notice more details than others having watched the movie the same number of times. Good discrimination also involves knowledge. In the movie example, someone with more experience with story-writing or the techiques of filming may discriminate more details, thus, making a more informed decision about the film. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.