Guest guest Posted February 10, 2003 Report Share Posted February 10, 2003 Om Namah Shivaya, The closest one can get to "BG for Dummies" is the Bhagavad Gita (A Handbook for Students) by C.Rajagopalachari. [Published by Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bombay] It is a very gentle introduction, written specifically for university students. (or for those who have the attitude of a beginner) Each chapter in this 128 page book has a few selected Sanskrit slokas with references, translation and lively commentary. I like Rajaji's style too. For advanced readers, he has also written another detailed book. Jai Ma, Ravi Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2003 Report Share Posted February 10, 2003 --- Ravishankar Krishnan <ravkris wrote: > Om Namah Shivaya, > The closest one can get to "BG for Dummies" is the > Bhagavad Gita (A Handbook for Students) by > C.Rajagopalachari. > [Published by Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bombay] > Rajagopalachari is also well known for his translations of the Ramayana and Mahabharata. He served as India's first Governor-General after independence. Is there a "Hinduism for Dummies" in the "______ for dummies" series of books? I've seen "Yoga for dummies". Keval Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2003 Report Share Posted February 10, 2003 om amritesvaryai namah as a matter of fact, there is a COMPLETE IDIOTS GUIDE TO HINDUISM, which is the same type of series as the 'Dummies' books...i work in a bookstore, and have had its darshan personally. oh, and incidentally, its written by Linda Johnson, a devotee of Amma, who wrote DAUGHTERS OF THE GODDESS. In Amma, ~sucetas mon~ om lokah samastah sukhino bhavantu _______________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2003 Report Share Posted February 10, 2003 No Hinduism for Dummies that I know of, but there is a "Spirituality for Dummies" by Sharon Janis, who also wrote a book, "Never to Return" about her experiences in Siddha Yoga. Both books are well done. Jyotsna the librarian:) --- Mike Brooker <patria1818 wrote: > > --- Ravishankar Krishnan <ravkris wrote: > > Om Namah Shivaya, > > The closest one can get to "BG for Dummies" is the > > Bhagavad Gita (A Handbook for Students) by > > C.Rajagopalachari. > > [Published by Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bombay] > > > Rajagopalachari is also well known for his > translations of the Ramayana and Mahabharata. He > served as India's first Governor-General after > independence. > > Is there a "Hinduism for Dummies" in the "______ for > dummies" series of books? I've seen "Yoga for > dummies". > > > Keval > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up > now. > http://mailplus. > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2003 Report Share Posted February 10, 2003 Doesn't Ammachi preach Non-violence as well? (As did Martin Luther King, Jr.) I was attracted to Hinduism (aside from the beauties of Hindu art, nusic, food, and culture) because of its many traditions of peace-making and conflict resolution. Outside of certain ashrams, I would probably be very uncomfortable in this modern, Gandhi-hating India you describe. -- Len/ Kalipadma Om lokah samastah sukino bhavantu Om shanti shanti shantih On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:42:35 -0800 (PST) avinash ramidi <avinash7_99 writes: > > First of all you should avoid reading Bagvad Gita > comming from two sets of people, First from ISKON > second from GANDHI. Don't even dare to read Gandhi's > translation. He views in totally different angle. > According to him Krishna actually doesn't advice > Arjuna to fight with his enemies, rather the fight is > symbolic signifying our fight with ever wondering > senses. Offcourse this is nothing but creation of > Gandhi himself, who was personification of > Non-violence. He viewed everything with glassess of > Non-violence, wether reading ramayana, mahabaratha or > bagvad gita every thing seemed preaching non-violence. > If anybody reading earlier translations of Bagvad Gita > they would be simply surprised by Gandhi's > conclusions. I don't know what Gandhi would have > adviced Sri Rama, since his wife Sita was abducted by > Ravana. Definetly he would have asked Rama not to > fight, but that was not the case,he fought, killed > Ravana and rescued Sita. No wonder Sri Rama is the > national hero, a role model of India. Gandhi is not at > all popular among Indain youth, surprisingly when I > came to United states many westerners think Indians > revere Gandhi, I would say yes but only old people. As > a student, I never, never, never met any boy or girl > in my school days impressed by Gandhi. Why Gandhi was > made a saint in India is due to simple reason, due to > INC or Indian National Congress. This is the political > party which Gandhi hails from, and this party ruled > India for nearly 50 years. In 50 years of their rule > Gandhi was made a saint,a mahatma, a guru. I should > say I am simply amazed by the westerners admiration > for Gandhi, In my high school he was a subject of > numerous jokes. I can challange any body right now at > this point to conduct survey on Gandhi's popularity in > India among the youth(not old people) the result would > be 90% against him. > ______________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2003 Report Share Posted February 10, 2003 Dear Madhuri, First of all you should avoid reading Bagvad Gita comming from two sets of people, First from ISKON second from GANDHI. Don't even dare to read Gandhi's translation. He views in totally different angle. According to him Krishna actually doesn't advice Arjuna to fight with his enemies, rather the fight is symbolic signifying our fight with ever wondering senses. Offcourse this is nothing but creation of Gandhi himself, who was personification of Non-violence. He viewed everything with glassess of Non-violence, wether reading ramayana, mahabaratha or bagvad gita every thing seemed preaching non-violence. If anybody reading earlier translations of Bagvad Gita they would be simply surprised by Gandhi's conclusions. I don't know what Gandhi would have adviced Sri Rama, since his wife Sita was abducted by Ravana. Definetly he would have asked Rama not to fight, but that was not the case,he fought, killed Ravana and rescued Sita. No wonder Sri Rama is the national hero, a role model of India. Gandhi is not at all popular among Indain youth, surprisingly when I came to United states many westerners think Indians revere Gandhi, I would say yes but only old people. As a student, I never, never, never met any boy or girl in my school days impressed by Gandhi. Why Gandhi was made a saint in India is due to simple reason, due to INC or Indian National Congress. This is the political party which Gandhi hails from, and this party ruled India for nearly 50 years. In 50 years of their rule Gandhi was made a saint,a mahatma, a guru. I should say I am simply amazed by the westerners admiration for Gandhi, In my high school he was a subject of numerous jokes. I can challange any body right now at this point to conduct survey on Gandhi's popularity in India among the youth(not old people) the result would be 90% against him. Now ISKCON, their translations are based on experiences of 14th century Bengali saint Chaintanya Maha prabhu. I noticed very often ISKCON books crticize Adi Shankara when ever they get a chance, according to them shiva is a demi-god. They totally condem Advaita or Non-duality. Their ideology is "duality is the means and duality is the end". These people does'nt favour yoga or pranayama. According to them in Kali Yuga Bhakti is the only path. Besides everything their literarture is biased coming from Vaishnava tradition. I wonder they forgot what Swami Vivekanada said, "If not of Adi Shankara who written commentaries on Bagvad Gita, it would have lost in oblivion". In 10th century Sri Ramanujacharya from Sri Perumbadur devloped his commentaries of Bagvad Gita, he belived in Vishista Advaita(qualified Non-dualism). In 15th century Madvacharya of Udipi developed his own commentaries following Dwaita(duality)path. None would be possible without Adi Shankara Initialisation, according to him Noduality is tha absolute truth, to which many lineages prescribe including Ammachi's. I would request you to read Bhagavad Gita Transalted by Swami Gambhirananda from Sri Ramakrishna Mission(adavita ashrama). This book includes commentary by Adi Shankara, besides that each and every sloka is in Sanskrit, then translated into an english sentence, then there is a meaning for word to word. Regards Avinash. Send Flowers for Valentine's Day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2003 Report Share Posted February 11, 2003 om amritesvaryai namah >>>Gandhi is not at all popular among Indain youth, surprisingly when I came to United states many westerners think Indians revere Gandhi, I would say yes but only old people. As a student, I never, never, never met any boy or girl in my school days impressed by Gandhi. <<< >>>In my high school he was a subject of numerous jokes. I can challange any body right now at this point to conduct survey on Gandhi's popularity in India among the youth(not old people) the result would be 90% against him.<<< well, avinash, unfortunately i think this says more about the merits of today's Indian youth than it does about the merits of Gandhiji. Mother speaks very highly of him. I don't think he was a Self-Realized Mahatma (though how exactly would i know?), but he was an 'ordinary' mahatma at the very least, which is more than i can say for myself, so i will continue to pranam before his example. regarding his emphasis on the symbolic aspect of the Gita, even Amma emphasises this....yes, the outer battle is a historical fact, but the outer is a reflection of the inner, not the other way around, and especially when a Guru or Avatar (in this case both) is involved. Sri Krishna Himself, in the midst of the battle raging all around, sought to impress upon his Disciple Arjuna the inner significance of it, and the whole Lila of the Mahabharata war, with the Gita being the theatrical climax, was designed by the Lord to be an everlasting Teaching...and so it has endured. this is my view at least....pranams... In Amma, ~sucetas mon~ om lokah samastah sukhino bhavantu _______________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2003 Report Share Posted February 11, 2003 I agree with Avinash, It really irritates me when people refer to India as land of Gandhi and Teresa. P.S. I have intentionally dropped the prefixes. - sucetas mon Ammachi Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:46 AM Re: Re: Bhagavadgita translation : [for dummies om amritesvaryai namah >>>Gandhi is not at all popular among Indain youth, surprisingly when I came to United states many westerners think Indians revere Gandhi, I would say yes but only old people. As a student, I never, never, never met any boy or girl in my school days impressed by Gandhi. <<< >>>In my high school he was a subject of numerous jokes. I can challange any body right now at this point to conduct survey on Gandhi's popularity in India among the youth(not old people) the result would be 90% against him.<<< well, avinash, unfortunately i think this says more about the merits of today's Indian youth than it does about the merits of Gandhiji. Mother speaks very highly of him. I don't think he was a Self-Realized Mahatma (though how exactly would i know?), but he was an 'ordinary' mahatma at the very least, which is more than i can say for myself, so i will continue to pranam before his example. regarding his emphasis on the symbolic aspect of the Gita, even Amma emphasises this....yes, the outer battle is a historical fact, but the outer is a reflection of the inner, not the other way around, and especially when a Guru or Avatar (in this case both) is involved. Sri Krishna Himself, in the midst of the battle raging all around, sought to impress upon his Disciple Arjuna the inner significance of it, and the whole Lila of the Mahabharata war, with the Gita being the theatrical climax, was designed by the Lord to be an everlasting Teaching...and so it has endured. this is my view at least....pranams... In Amma, ~sucetas mon~ om lokah samastah sukhino bhavantu _______________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha! Ammachi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2003 Report Share Posted February 11, 2003 om amritesvaryai namah >>>I agree with Avinash, It really irritates me when people refer to India >>>as land of Gandhi and Teresa. P.S. I have intentionally dropped the prefixes.<<< forgive me for prolonging this, and i promise this will be the last i say on the matter, but what i find really irritating is when two souls who, despite whatever human flaws might have been there, were infinitely more selfless than any of us who have the arrogance to comment so casually and negatively, are belittled like this. when you help instill a sense of self-respect and self-determination in an oppressed nation, and inspire others to do the same, or spend your life easing the suffering of, and seeing God in countless of the poorest and downtrodden, and inspire others to do the same, then you will have earned the right to comment like this....but until you have given yourself so wholly to your own Dharma, you should avoid being so careless with your words. yes, its your opinion and you have the right to it....but i personally believe Amma's opinion would be as against yours as yours is against theirs...and i will always side with Amma. forgive me for presuming to know what Amma would say... In Amma, ~sucetas mon~ om lokah samastah sukhino bhavantu _______________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2003 Report Share Posted February 11, 2003 Please define non-violence for us Gandhiji used to fast to coerce people to agree to his demands, that's also a passive form of violence, against his own body of course. He preached non-violence, truth, and brahmacharya but he had a hard time sticking to them till his end because of his interpretation of the words, spirituality teaches us to be in the middle, not extremes. You might push somebody trying to jump off a bridge and hurt him in the process, that's still non-violence You might lie to a person on a hospital bed who just had a heart attack to prevent him from having another stroke, but you cannot be accused of going against the principle of truth You can lead a family life not abstain from sex but still entitled to be called a brahmachari - Black Lotus L Rosenberg Ammachi Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:40 AM Re: Re: Bhagavadgita translation : [for dummies Doesn't Ammachi preach Non-violence as well? (As did Martin Luther King, Jr.) I was attracted to Hinduism (aside from the beauties of Hindu art, nusic, food, and culture) because of its many traditions of peace-making and conflict resolution. Outside of certain ashrams, I would probably be very uncomfortable in this modern, Gandhi-hating India you describe. -- Len/ Kalipadma Om lokah samastah sukino bhavantu Om shanti shanti shantih On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:42:35 -0800 (PST) avinash ramidi <avinash7_99 writes: > > First of all you should avoid reading Bagvad Gita > comming from two sets of people, First from ISKON > second from GANDHI. Don't even dare to read Gandhi's > translation. He views in totally different angle. > According to him Krishna actually doesn't advice > Arjuna to fight with his enemies, rather the fight is > symbolic signifying our fight with ever wondering > senses. Offcourse this is nothing but creation of > Gandhi himself, who was personification of > Non-violence. He viewed everything with glassess of > Non-violence, wether reading ramayana, mahabaratha or > bagvad gita every thing seemed preaching non-violence. > If anybody reading earlier translations of Bagvad Gita > they would be simply surprised by Gandhi's > conclusions. I don't know what Gandhi would have > adviced Sri Rama, since his wife Sita was abducted by > Ravana. Definetly he would have asked Rama not to > fight, but that was not the case,he fought, killed > Ravana and rescued Sita. No wonder Sri Rama is the > national hero, a role model of India. Gandhi is not at > all popular among Indain youth, surprisingly when I > came to United states many westerners think Indians > revere Gandhi, I would say yes but only old people. As > a student, I never, never, never met any boy or girl > in my school days impressed by Gandhi. Why Gandhi was > made a saint in India is due to simple reason, due to > INC or Indian National Congress. This is the political > party which Gandhi hails from, and this party ruled > India for nearly 50 years. In 50 years of their rule > Gandhi was made a saint,a mahatma, a guru. I should > say I am simply amazed by the westerners admiration > for Gandhi, In my high school he was a subject of > numerous jokes. I can challange any body right now at > this point to conduct survey on Gandhi's popularity in > India among the youth(not old people) the result would > be 90% against him. > ______________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha! Ammachi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.