Guest guest Posted August 22, 2003 Report Share Posted August 22, 2003 Hi !!!!!! I wanna join the Amma-group "bad crowd" and contribute to the Hottt outlaw CLOSED TOPIC that just like the Energizer Bunny, it keeps going and going and going.... Dearest Don, I believe that Kali represents the divine feminine principle and Krishna represents the divine masculine principle. And I believe that Amma is a person who was either born or grew to be fully merged with these principles, therefore, I believe that Amma is an avatar. I also believe with conviction that The Beatles collectively were an avatar. It doesn't bother me at all if you disagree or see things differently. I think everybody sees things differently, naturally. Is the idea that some devotees beliefs may seem wacky to the general public so disturbing that we ought to keep our ideas to ourselves? Should we refrain from expressing peacefully our own spiritual beliefs lest we alienate somebody??? Are we supposed to worry that if we say "Amma is Krishna" (because for us it's true) it will upset, confuse, or scare someone and make us appear "cultish"? Isn't this list was the proper place to express these sentiments? Amma devotees are none the same, I've never seen such a diverse and loosely affiliated bunch of people, barely organized. There's no single belief or dogma, no intolerance or indoctrination... I just don't get what you mean by "cultish" If you wanna see "cultish" check out any mainstream religion! They scare the BE-Jesus out of me!!! ~ A culty woman according to Don (amarthya) In a message dated 8/22/03 7:38:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Ammachi writes: Message: 2 Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:19:20 -0000 "Don James" <djames Re: TOPIC CLOSED: Cultish behavior, emotional expression Ammachi, KandarW@a... wrote: > Djames@t... writes: << you misunderstand my position on cultic mindsets. I'm in agreement with you about those who leave their guru and then bash them for whatever reason which you went into detail about. I'm not talking about people who reject their guru, but in just keeping an open mind to being able to look at our own behavior and see how much of it is traditionalism and whether some of that is unexamined and may not really be to the advantage of Amma's cause(s) which are our causes, too. Those are, in my mind, to bring higher consciousness to those who can hear it and to bring love and comfort to all. I'm not trying to say anything negative, but just look at some of the ways that perhaps the traditionalism of the Hindu Bhakti yoga form may make Amma's mission less universal. Especially some of the more mythical thinking, such as her being an Avatar or in incarnation of some god like Kali of Krishna. These ideas would alienate some of the more simpler thinkers in society and turn them off and away from the very real and universal message of enlightenment that Amma does indeed bring and embody. >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 I know it does not matter who I "think" Amma is, for She is beyond my minds ability to comprehend. When I try to discuss Her my words fall so far short, arrows landing far from the target. What is true for me are my experiences around my Divine Mother. These experiences sound trivial when spoken, but when they happen they rock my entire being. Call Her guru, saint, avatar, divine incarnation, whatever you like. For me Amma is IT. As far as who other beings are, or have been I will not attempt to catagorize. I will try to remember to look for truth to be revealed to me in my heart with my Amma as the revealer. Jai Ma! Omana Ammachi, Dianadevi@a... wrote: > Hi !!!!!! > > I wanna join the Amma-group "bad crowd" and contribute to the Hottt outlaw > CLOSED TOPIC that just like the Energizer Bunny, it keeps going and going and > going.... > > Dearest Don, > > I believe that Kali represents the divine feminine principle and Krishna > represents the divine masculine principle. And I believe that Amma is a person who > was either born or grew to be fully merged with these principles, therefore, > I believe that Amma is an avatar. I also believe with conviction that The > Beatles collectively were an avatar. It doesn't bother me at all if you disagree > or see things differently. I think everybody sees things differently, > naturally. > > Is the idea that some devotees beliefs may seem wacky to the general public > so disturbing that we ought to keep our ideas to ourselves? Should we refrain > from expressing peacefully our own spiritual beliefs lest we alienate > somebody??? Are we supposed to worry that if we say "Amma is Krishna" (because for us > it's true) it will upset, confuse, or scare someone and make us appear > "cultish"? Isn't this list was the proper place to express these sentiments? > > Amma devotees are none the same, I've never seen such a diverse and loosely > affiliated bunch of people, barely organized. There's no single belief or > dogma, no intolerance or indoctrination... I just don't get what you mean by > "cultish" If you wanna see "cultish" check out any mainstream religion! They scare > the BE-Jesus out of me!!! > > ~ A culty woman according to Don (amarthya) > > > In a message dated 8/22/03 7:38:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > Ammachi writes: > > Message: 2 > Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:19:20 -0000 > "Don James" <djames@t...> > Re: TOPIC CLOSED: Cultish behavior, emotional expression > > Ammachi, KandarW@a... wrote: > > Djames@t... writes: > > << you misunderstand my position on cultic mindsets. I'm in agreement > with you about those who leave their guru and then bash them for > whatever reason which you went into detail about. I'm not talking > about people who reject their guru, but in just keeping an open mind > to being able to look at our own behavior and see how much of it is > traditionalism and whether some of that is unexamined and may not > really be to the advantage of Amma's cause(s) which are our causes, > too. Those are, in my mind, to bring higher consciousness to those > who can hear it and to bring love and comfort to all. I'm not trying > to say anything negative, but just look at some of the ways that > perhaps the traditionalism of the Hindu Bhakti yoga form may make > Amma's mission less universal. Especially some of the more mythical > thinking, such as her being an Avatar or in incarnation of some god > like Kali of Krishna. These ideas would alienate some of the more > simpler thinkers in society and turn them off and away from the very > real and universal message of enlightenment that Amma does indeed > bring and embody. > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.