to ecjensen about A general missive on the use of tools

January 24, 2006

ecjensen wrote:

>> ...but

>> even if you had taken the "paycheck" as the typist that money is

>> Shakti that She can use. Amma along with words and ideas, also

>> donated $23 million to help relieve the suffering of the Tsunami

>> victims. so you could have had a positive influence thru affluence.

>> if more people with money were more spiritually minded, or if more

>> spiritually minded people had money, things would happen much

>> quicker. the poor are not exactly driving our countries resources or

>> decisions. money is a powerful form of Shakti on the physical plane.

Dear ecjensen ~ so true, and I'm actually very very happy that there are at

least some people who have money who use their wealth resources to contribute

to the wellbeing of humanity...

Jimmy Carter comes to mind. He built the Carter Center as a forum for ideas

and action, and also as a base, a base from which he, and sometimes he and

Rosalyn go out from and do amazing things like helping to cure river blindness

(I can't remember the country, but the cure was not rocket science; just know

how and resources) or being mediators and conflict resolvers in different

parts of the world. They do so much more; it would take pages and pages to tell

it. And there are others who take their "fame" wealth and use it to do

wonderful things like stand up for children with disabilities or work to find a

cure to Parkinsons Disease.

So much can be done with much. And even much can be done with only a little.

That is how groups like the Children's Health Fund and the March of Dimes

work. If not for the all the $10 and $15 donations, even with all the grant

money they receive, they would not be as effective.

As you say, it is all Shakti and the only question is what are we going to

do with it?

Jai Ma ~ Linda

Recommended Posts