Guest guest Posted April 9, 2003 Report Share Posted April 9, 2003 Those who postulate, "I can't go back to Godhead in this life; maybe next time" are unlikely to ever go back to Godhead, having virtually decided not to. For such an attitude will be carried on to the next life, and thus they will never adopt the serious determination to surrender and do whatever is required to achieve the ultimate goal. One who tries for it in this life, ever begging for the mercy of guru and Krsna in his otherwise nigh impossible endeavor, might make it back to Godhead in the next life or maybe even in this life. Certainly such an attitude will attract the mercy of guru and Krsna that is required to quickly terminate material bondage. But one who flippantly postpones the attempt is liable to be caught in perpetual procrastination and, in the words of Krsna, is killing himself: nr-deham adyam su-labham su-durlabham plavam su-kalpam guru-karna-dharam mayanukülena nabhasvateritam puman bhavabdhim na taret sa atma-ha "The human body, which can award all benefit in life is automatically obtained by the laws of nature, although it is a very rare achievement. This human body can be compared to a perfectly constructed boat having the spiritual master as the captain and the instructions of the Personality of Godhead as favorable winds impelling it on its course. Considering all these advantages, a human being who does not utilize his human life to cross the ocean of material existence must be considered the killer of his own soul." (SB 11.20.7) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2003 Report Share Posted April 10, 2003 "Bhakti Vikasa Swami" wrote.... Those who postulate, "I can't go back to Godhead in this life; maybe next time" are unlikely to ever go back to Godhead is it possible for a soul who is eternally part and parcel of the Lord to NEVER go back to GODHEAD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2003 Report Share Posted April 10, 2003 Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada. Bhakti Vikasa Swami <Bhakti.Vikasa.Swami (AT) pamho (DOT) net> wrote: Those who postulate, "I can't go back to Godhead in this life; maybe nexttime" are unlikely to ever go back to Godhead, having virtually decided notto. I have heard that there are two kinds of souls, nitya-baddha, eternally conditioned and nitya-mukta, eternally liberated (I think!). So, I understand you are referring to the former class? But, do these souls never get a chance? if that is the case, that brings in an element of partiality on Krishna's side. Why do some souls choose to be conditioned (or choose material enjoyment) and why not others? I believe answers to some of these questions are not very convincing, whichever sampradaya we look into. Although, the element of free will and its misuse explains a few things, it's very hard to understand, why some souls misuse their free will and are made to suffer (because of karmic laws, which are ultimately designed by Krishna), and while others (the eternal associates who help in his pastimes) seem to have eternal happiness by remembering Him all the time. I have heard that finding answers can be difficult and what we have to is to sincerely follow the process and we will know as we progress. Is that true? Or, are there some answers that I'm ignorant of that even a neophyte can grasp? Awaiting eagerly for your answers and thoughts of other devotees. Thanks in advance, in your service, Aravind. Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 11, 2003 Report Share Posted April 11, 2003 achintya, Aravind Mohanram <psuaravind> wrote: > I have heard that there are two kinds of souls, nitya-baddha, eternally conditioned and nitya-mukta, eternally liberated (I think!). So, I understand you are referring to the former class? But, do these souls never get a chance? if that is the case, that brings in an element of partiality on Krishna's side. Why do some souls > I have heard it said that Maadhvas do consider some souls to be eternally conditioned. However, the fault for this lies entirely with those souls rather than Krishna. It simply is the case that some individuals will always refuse to enter into Krishna's devotional service and thus remain in maayaa. But they always get the chance nevertheless. Thus, it is their own free will which they misuse, rather than any partiality on Krishna's part. - K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2003 Report Share Posted April 22, 2003 On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Bhakti Vikasa Swami wrote: > "The human body, which can award all benefit in life is automatically > obtained by the laws of nature, although it is a very rare achievement. This > human body can be compared to a perfectly constructed boat having the > spiritual master as the captain and the instructions of the Personality of > Godhead as favorable winds impelling it on its course. Considering all these > advantages, a human being who does not utilize his human life to cross the > ocean of material existence must be considered the killer of his own soul." > (SB 11.20.7) In a sense, anyone who has come into contact with a bonafide guru and sadhu-sanga, and who is trying to follow the process taught in sastra, has already come 90% of the way. Out of 8,400,000 other possible species, someone has finally evolved to the human form; moreover, he or she may have even taken spiritual initiation, which is itself a major achievement as well. One simply has to diligently adhere to what Krsna has given so far (as per the advice of Upadesamrta), and success practically guaranteed. MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2003 Report Share Posted April 23, 2003 >> In a sense, anyone who has come into contact with a bonafide guru and sadhu-sanga, and who is trying to follow the process taught in sastra, has already come 90% of the way. Out of 8,400,000 other possible species, someone has finally evolved to the human form; moreover, he or she may have even taken spiritual initiation, which is itself a major achievement as well. << Haribol, What sense is this? Although I do not diagree with the idea that taking spiritual initiayion from a bona-fide guru is a great achievement, I observe that this verse is in Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu: adau sraddha tatah sadhu-sango ’tha bhajana-kriya tato ’nartha-nivrttih syat tato nistha rucis tatah athasaktis tato bhavas tatah premabhyudancati sadhakanam ayam premnah pradurbhave bhavet kramah So based on the above, sadhu-sanga and bhajana-kriya (often used to denote initiation) are the first two steps, so how do you equate that with saying that sadhakas who have achieved this level have come 90% of the way when there is so much more to achieve? In service of Nityananda-Gauranga, Jay ===== "One who chants Gauranga's name will get the mercy of Krsna, and he will be able to live in Vrndavana. One who worships Krsna without chanting the name of Gauranga will get Krsna only after a long time. But he who takes Gauranga's name quickly gets Krsna, for offenses do not remain within him." - Sri Narada Muni, Navadvipa Dhama-mahatmya, Chapter 7 The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2003 Report Share Posted April 24, 2003 (MDd wrote) > >> In a sense, anyone who has come into contact with a > bonafide guru and sadhu-sanga, and who is trying to > follow the process taught in sastra, has already come > 90% of the way. Out of 8,400,000 other possible > species, someone has finally evolved to the human > form; moreover, he or she may have even taken > spiritual initiation, which is itself a major > achievement as well. << On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Sanjay Dadlani wrote: > I observe that this verse > is in Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu: > > adau sraddha tatah sadhu-sango ’tha bhajana-kriya > tato ’nartha-nivrttih syat tato nistha rucis tatah > athasaktis tato bhavas tatah premabhyudancati > sadhakanam ayam premnah pradurbhave bhavet kramah > > So based on the above, sadhu-sanga and bhajana-kriya > (often used to denote initiation) are the first two > steps, so how do you equate that with saying that > sadhakas who have achieved this level have come 90% of > the way when there is so much more to achieve? I’m looking at it broadly, in terms of the millennia of reincarnations we conditioned souls undergo, and optimistically, as I’ve hinted above. An analogy explains the rarity of obtaining a bonafide guru; somewhere within the vast ocean, there is a particular sea turtle. Floating somewhere in that same ocean is a log which just happens to have a small knothole in it. Sea turtles rarely surface to breathe, so the likelihood of this turtle doing so in such a way that its head goes through the knothole of that driftwood is very slight; finding a bonafide guru in this life is equally rare. Of course, attaining a human birth is rare itself (durlabham manusam janma), so to attain both is quite an achievement. However, we also have to consider one’s specific spiritual goal, which is relative. My analysis stresses generic bhakti, or even liberation (i.e., “going back to Godhead” in the manner initially sought by most conditioned souls, viz., the four types of Vaisnava liberations); Srila Prabhupada himself stressed this at times. It is thus relevant for most people. At the same time, we Gaudiya Vaisnavas should also appreciate the rare, exalted, and highly confidential nature of the Krsna-prema offered only by Lord Caitanya and his followers. The quote you’ve given from Rupa Gosvami’s Bhaktirasamrta-sindhu neatly outlines the stages of spiritual advancement beginning from initial faith, to satsanga (saintly association), consequent bhajana-kriya (including initiation), anartha-nivrtti (removal of obstacles), fixity, firm attraction, and strong attachment, to affection (bhava), and then mature love of Krsna (prema). In fact, prema is itself subdivided into many further stages, such that Rupa Gosvami saw a need to write another entire book about it (Ujjvala-nilamani). So to someone, the “adau sraddha” verse might also seem as elementary or incomplete as my analysis. However, most people just don’t have the prerequisite qualifications to enter such topics, so it’s just as well to let these things remain relatively confidential, at least in public fora. Any such teaching is relative to the qualification of its intended audience. I hope this helps. MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.