Guest guest Posted April 28, 2003 Report Share Posted April 28, 2003 >> It would be inappropriate to call the brahmajyoti Brahman if it did not share at least this basic characteristic, seeing as how even the jiivas are eternal. << Nityananda-Gauranga! I forgot to comment on this point about the eternality of jivas. I know that jivas are eternal on the strength of 'mamaivamso jivaloka jivabhuta sanatanah,' in which Sri Krishna insists that the jivas are but *eternal* fragmental parts of Himself. This led me to believe that jivas are/were never created but are/were always existing. That is perhaps, the definition of eternal and eternity? Perhaps I was mistaken? Yet on the Dvaita list, there appears to be a current side-discussion going on about how jivas are *created* whenever the necessity arises. Therefore it seems that the Madhvas have provision in their doctrine of new creations of jivas happening. I wonder why this is so. Kind regards, Jay ===== "One who chants Gauranga's name will get the mercy of Krsna, and he will be able to live in Vrndavana. One who worships Krsna without chanting the name of Gauranga will get Krsna only after a long time. But he who takes Gauranga's name quickly gets Krsna, for offenses do not remain within him." - Sri Narada Muni, Navadvipa Dhama-mahatmya, Chapter 7 The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.