Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 In Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusan's Sri Aisvarya-kadambini, Pancami Vrsti, Fifth Shower, text 6 it states: hitva tasminn atma-putram yasoda- kanyam nitva so bhyadat kamsa-raje aikyam bimbir arbhayor va tadabhud ekanamsacintya-saktir yato 'sau Vasudeva placed his own son in Nanda's home, took Yasoda's daughter, and gave her to King Kamsa. By Lord Krsna's inconceivable potency the two Krsnas born separately from Devaki and Yasoda became one tiny child. Note: HDG A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada mentions this pastime in the following words (Srimad-Bhagavatam 10.3.47 Purport): `Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti discusses that Krsna appeared simultaneously as the son of Devaki and the son of Yasoda, along with the spiritual energy Yogamaya. As the son of Devaki, He first appeared as Visnu, and because Vasudeva was not in the position of pure affection for Krsna, Vasudeva worshiped his son as Lord Visnu. Yasoda, however, pleased her son Krsna without understanding His Godhood. This is the difference between Krsna as the son of Yasoda and as the son of Devaki. This is explained by Visvanatha Cakravarti on the authority of Hari-vamsa." Kusa-kratha also cites Srila Rupa Gosvami: "Srila Rupa Gosvami also discusses this pastime in these words (Laghu-Bhagavatamrta 1.5.454-456: kecid bhagavatah prahur evam atra puratanah vyuhah pradurbhaved adyo grhesv tu mayaya sardham sri-lila-purusottamah "In ancient times some devotees have said that the Lord appeared in His Vasudeva feature in the home of Maharaja Vasudeva, and at the same time He appeared in His original form Krsna in the village of Vraja. In this way these devotees have said that Sri Krsna and Yogamaya were the twin children of Yasoda in Vrajabhumi." gatva yadu-varo gostham tatra suri-grham visan kanyam eva param viksya tam adayavrajat puram pravisad vasudevas tu sri-lila-purusottamam "When Maharaja Vasudeva arrived in Vrajabhumi he entered Yasoda-devi's maternity room, saw Yasoda's daughter, took her, and returned with her to Mathura. The Vasudeva expansion Maharaja Vasudeva carried with him entered the body of Sri Krsna, who had just taken birth as the son of Yasoda. In this way the two forms of Vasudeva and Krsna became one." tac cati-rahasyatvan noktam tatra katha-krame kintu kvacit prasangena sucyate sri sukadibhih "Because this pastime is very confidential it was not related in Srimad-Bhagavatam. Nevertheless Sukadeva Gosvami and other great devotees have indirectly described it in some of their writings." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2003 Report Share Posted August 20, 2003 achintya, "rupavi" <rupavi@n...> wrote: > tac cati-rahasyatvan > noktam tatra katha-krame > kintu kvacit prasangena > sucyate sri sukadibhih > > "Because this pastime is very confidential it was not related in Srimad-Bhagavatam. Nevertheless Sukadeva Gosvami and other great devotees have indirectly described it in some of their writings." Bhagavata is the top most vaishnava scripture. Indeed it is Sri Krishna himself. It describes all the confidential past times of Krishna like Rasa-lila etc.... which is not understood by greatest of the transcendentalists. Bhagavata is last word on Vaishnava Vedanta, then why Bhagavata, the epitome of Vedas will exclude this past time ? Your Servant Always, Sumeet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2003 Report Share Posted August 22, 2003 > Bhagavata is the top most vaishnava scripture. Indeed it is Sri Krishna himself. It describes all the confidential past times of Krishna like Rasa-lila etc.... which is not understood by greatest of the transcendentalists. Bhagavata is last word on Vaishnava Vedanta, then why Bhagavata, the epitome of Vedas will exclude this past time ? Your Servant Always,Sumeet. Actually, the quote in question is from the writings of Srila Rupa Gosvami, not my idea. But in relation to the general import of your question, Sukadeva Gosvami had seven days to speak to Maharaja Pariksit. He didn't mention much about Radharani directly either, but discussion of Radharani and other topics is covered in some depth in other parts of Vedic literature. Not every confidential topic is discussed in unlimited detail in the SB; however, that doesn't diminish its status as the topmost Purana. Rupa-vilasa dasa To from this group, send an email to:achintyaAchintya Homepage: achintyaDISCLAIMER: All postings appearing on Achintya are the property of their authors, and they may not be cross-posted to other forums without prior approval by said authors. Views expressed in Achintya postings are those of their authors only, and are not necessarily endorsed by the moderator or spiritual leaders of the Gaudiiya school. Your use of Groups is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.