Guest guest Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Aravind Mohanram wrote: >I want to raise another point here with regard to the Mayavadis - in one of the verses in Bhagavatam, we have Mayavadis being glorified as Mahajanas (two kinds of transcendentalists, devotees and mayavadis...) and in other places we see such outright criticisms thrown at them - how can we reconcile such statements?> Dandavats. Jaya Srila Prabhupada. Pardon me for butting in here; one consideration is that it's important to distinguish between the mayavadi impersonalists and various other types of impersonalists. Many genuine impersonalists are simply innocent; they simply haven't yet received the mercy of pure devotees or Bhagavan. However, the mayavadis *refuse* such mercy due to their impudent ideology, with which they deny Bhagavan's exalted and transcendental status. That is, they say they're themselves transcendental, while also asserting that Bhagavan is ultimately mundane. That's both absurd and repugnant. Because they are also transcendalists, devotees sometimes respect even the impersonalists, but because the mayavadis are offenders, they're nonetheless rejected. In many cases, the "transcendentalism" of so-called mayavadi groups is also doubtful anyway; amongst so many cheating entrepreneurs in saffron robes, it's actually difficult to find a bonafide impersonalist these days. I don't think we'll find many references from Prabhupada's books in which mayavadis in particular are praised. I hope this helps. MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.