re Sankara's gita commentary

[Guest guest]

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

 

Letter PAMHO:7362944 (26 lines)

Internet: "Rajaram Venkataramani" <v_raja_ram

16-Oct-03 09:29 -0400 (06:29 -0700)

tp_somesh_kumar

achintya

Cc: Bhakti Vikasa Swami [61103]

Comment: Text PAMHO:7365918 by Internet: Somesh Kumar

re Sankara's gita commentary

---------------------------

hare krishna somesh prabhu -

 

please accept my humble obeisances. all glories to sri guru and sri govinda.

i am not on achintya group and you may bounce it to them if you want.

 

my giving you arguments will only harden your stand but if you want we can

discuss over phone 91-44-2471-9405 or let me know if i should defend at all.

pl. note that we are debating what is correct interpretation of brahmano hi

verse :

 

- the lord is self situated as said by sankara or

- the brahma jyoti is situated in the lord as stated by gaudiyas

 

if you read your response, you will see you are using circular logic to

establish your point. you are taking the gaudiya interpretation is correct

to defend the same. that is incorrect.

 

yours humbly

rajaram v.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The New with improved product search

(Text PAMHO:7362944) ------

 

------- End of Forwarded Message ------

[Guest guest]

All these cross postings and forwardings are starting to get a little

confusing. I think some redundant material has already been posted.

 

Can someone simply invite the interested parties (Venkataraman R.) to

join Achintya so we can discuss the issue clearly here? I think this

would make for an interesting discussion, and it would be easier if

we were all doing it within one forum.

 

thanks,

 

the moderator