Guest guest Posted November 11, 2003 Report Share Posted November 11, 2003 or its just some kind of social evil that crept into vedic society ? Please answer. hare krishna Your Servant Always Sumeet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2003 Report Share Posted November 12, 2003 Hare Krishna! During the marriage ceremony of one of her sisters, Lord Shiva was not offered respect by Sati's father Daksha Prajapati. As such Sati- wife of Lord Shiva,who could not bear the insult- entered into the fire in the Yajna arena, and the self-immolation was termed after her! In Vedic civilization, a woman entered into fire willingly after the demise of her husbasnd. When Moghul Kings and other Islamic Invaders attacked in Rajasthan, queens showed their valor, fought Moslems attackers, and used to enter into fire willingly to self-immolate along with their husbands rather than facing humiliation from the foreign attackers. The system became evil when young women were forced by elderly Hindu family members and so called well wishers against the wishes of women, whose husbands passed away but those women did not want to self-immolate. Raja Ram Mohan Rai helped British Rulers in passing a law which declared it illegal to burn a woman against her will.A Bill was passed some 200 years ago. Hare Rama Dasanudas Dr. Prayag Narayan das Misra email: wwti Telephone: 480 814 1372 --- sumeet1981 <sumeet1981 wrote: > > or its just some kind of social evil that crept into > vedic society ? > > Please answer. > > hare krishna > > Your Servant Always > Sumeet. > > > Protect your identity with Mail AddressGuard http://antispam./whatsnewfree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2003 Report Share Posted November 12, 2003 On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, sumeet1981 wrote: > or its just some kind of social evil that crept into vedic society ? > Please answer. It's mentioned in various places in the Srimad-bhagavatam, as in 1.13.58. MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2003 Report Share Posted November 12, 2003 Hare Krishna Thank you Prayag Misra. MDD, What i actually want to know is that, is Sati pratha a "Vedic principle" which is to be followed by hindu women ? Are there rules laid down in dharma sastra or any other vedic sastra that a hindu women must commit Sati after death of her husband ? Your Servant Always, Sumeet. achintya, mpt@u... wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, sumeet1981 wrote: > > or its just some kind of social evil that crept into vedic society ? > > Please answer. > > It's mentioned in various places in the Srimad-bhagavatam, as in 1.13.58. > > MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2003 Report Share Posted November 12, 2003 On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, sumeet1981 wrote: > What i actually want to know is that, is Sati pratha a "Vedic > principle" which is to be followed by hindu women ? > Are there rules laid down in dharma sastra or any other vedic sastra > that a hindu women must commit Sati after death of her husband ? There are no such injunctions that I can think of. Generally, Srila Prabhupada (or anyone who is genuinely self realized) emphasizes the principle behind sati more than the traditional rite itself. After all, what's the use or value of any ossified tradition, apart from the profound spiritual inspiration that usually creates them? We each and all have our religious obligations, and the sometimes astonishing degree to which our predecessors were devoted to their own, can--and should--provide us with tremendous inspiration. Bereft of such eternal worth, such rituals tend to be empty, if not even obnoxious, and they thus become outdated, illegal, etc. >From the sati rite we can get a glimpse of how seriously people used to take their personal dharmas. Such commitment follows quite naturally from a more sublime appreciation of dharma in general, one which is firmly grounded in Vedic philosophy but too often absent (and perhaps even impossible) in modern cultures. I think the true meaning of the word dharma can hardly be sensed without understanding what deeper reality justifies its practice. Although normative (which makes it perfectly acceptable to translate dharma as "duty"), it is at the same time suprarational, in that any given duty embodies the whole significance of the higher reality that orders the cosmos, though hidden from ordinary experience and reason. In the Upanisads, it is called "rta," the orderly coursing of that central reality from which every manifestation has issued and which each one represents; thus the rule, or obligatory function, of all individuals is given by their very being--to the extent th! at they participate in this central reality. In this respect, one's dharma cannot possibly be any extrinsic imposition, or the mere correspondence of a specific proposition with some relative, independent result or aim; instead, it is wholly defined by one’s mere existence, relative to one’s practical recognition of ultimate reality. Given what we've heard or experienced about how participation in dharma increasingly decays in Kaliyuga, I would guess that a deeper sense of dharma, capable of inspiring the intensity of practice seen in “sati,” was previously intuited naturally by many people, without much conscious deliberation. MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2003 Report Share Posted November 13, 2003 Hare krsna.In MAHABHARATHA we have that famous incident where in MADRI wife of pandu went as sati,climbing husband's pyre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.