Guest guest Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 It would be a good idea to actually quote Vivekachudamani to discuss what Sankara said in Vivekachudamani. These verses (VC 47, VC 190 & VC 202) mentioned and commented by Krishna Susarla is not to be found in Vivekachudamani by Sri Chandrasekara Bharthi of Srngeri Sankara mutt. Krishna Susarla has picked up some unscholarly work and decorated it with his own scholarly purport. If the gosvamis have quoted Sankara direcly (meaning Sankara's own words) and shown the fallacy in it. Why dont you just post that instead of composing new works ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.