Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Vivekachudamani - The verses are not in the original

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

It would be a good idea to actually quote Vivekachudamani to discuss

what Sankara said in Vivekachudamani. These verses (VC 47, VC 190 &

VC 202) mentioned and commented by Krishna Susarla is not to be

found in Vivekachudamani by Sri Chandrasekara Bharthi of Srngeri

Sankara mutt. Krishna Susarla has picked up some unscholarly work

and decorated it with his own scholarly purport.

 

If the gosvamis have quoted Sankara direcly (meaning Sankara's own

words) and shown the fallacy in it. Why dont you just post that

instead of composing new works ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...