Guest guest Posted April 23, 2005 Report Share Posted April 23, 2005 Asocyan anvasocas tvam prajna-vadams ca bhasase: [bg. 2.11] "Arjuna, you are talking like a learned man, but you are a fool number one." Gatasün agatasüms ca nanusocanti panditah. That means "If you had been actually pandita, learned man, then you would not have lamented for this body." Gatasün. "The body is neither a subject matter for lamentation, either living condition or dead condition. It has no value." This is the instruction, Krsna's word. But the modern civilization, they are giving all value to this body, all their philanthropic work, hospitalization, and this, so many things. Just like our Mr. George Harrison, he raised how many millions dollars for... Karandhara: Nine million. Prabhupada: Nine million dollars, and, to the... This is going on. In the Bhagavad-gita we don't find anywhere a single line that "You raise funds for," I mean to say, "giving relief to the poor" or "to the suffering." Is there any instruction in Bhagavad-gita? You have read. Can you find out? But these people, they have become more learned than Krsna. In our country, Vivekananda: daridra-narayana-seva. The whole Ramakrishna Mission is collecting funds only on this rascal plea. --Srimad-Bhagavatam 2.9.4 -- Japan, April 22, 1972 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2005 Report Share Posted April 24, 2005 > Prabhupada: Nine million dollars, and, to the... This is going on. In the > Bhagavad-gita we don't find anywhere a single line that "You raise funds > for," I mean to say, "giving relief to the poor" or "to the suffering." Is > there any instruction in Bhagavad-gita? You have read. Can you find out? But > these people, they have become more learned than Krsna. In our country, > Vivekananda: daridra-narayana-seva. The whole Ramakrishna Mission is > collecting funds only on this rascal plea. > --Srimad-Bhagavatam 2.9.4 -- Japan, April 22, 1972 Yesterday at the Houston International festival I saw a modern Sri Vaisnava organization whose display clearly proclaimed that they are "Serving God by serving man." MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2005 Report Share Posted April 24, 2005 Despite the Bhagavad-Gita not specifically teaching giving relief to the poor, in the Mahabharat, Yuddishtira was always giving charity to the Brahmins and other castes. In fact, a lot of wealth was required for the Rajsuya Yagna and also the Ashwamegha Yagya. The reason for that was because it was to be given in charity. In the Aswamegha Yagna, Yudhisthira, than the emperor of the entire earth, gifted it to Vyasadeva. Also, Srila Prabhupada himself said that no one should go hungry within 3 miles of a temple. He had setup huge Sunday feasts so that prasadam could be freely provided. Expanding on this, the ISKCON food-for-life program provides charity to all sorts of poor people around the world. They are doing a fantastic job building schools and providing prasadum to the villages around Vrindavan (this I have personally seen). So, I am a little confused by this excerpt, and it feels like it is being quoted out of context. Krishna _____ achintya [achintya] On Behalf Of Bhakti Vikasa Swami Saturday, April 23, 2005 5:00 AM achintya; Atri Muni Prabhu; Balarama LOK; Ganga IDS; Jagat Purush dasa; Mahesh Pandit Patna; Nitai Pada Kamala (IDS); Samvit Dasi; Vijaya Govinda (das) BSDS (Chennai - IN); BVKS Sanga; ICC (Indian Continental Committee); Prabhupada Disciples; Quotes Bhagavad-gita doesn't teach giving relief to the poor Asocyan anvasocas tvam prajna-vadams ca bhasase: [bg. 2.11] "Arjuna, you are talking like a learned man, but you are a fool number one." Gatasün agatasüms ca nanusocanti panditah. That means "If you had been actually pandita, learned man, then you would not have lamented for this body." Gatasün. "The body is neither a subject matter for lamentation, either living condition or dead condition. It has no value." This is the instruction, Krsna's word. But the modern civilization, they are giving all value to this body, all their philanthropic work, hospitalization, and this, so many things. Just like our Mr. George Harrison, he raised how many millions dollars for... Karandhara: Nine million. Prabhupada: Nine million dollars, and, to the... This is going on. In the Bhagavad-gita we don't find anywhere a single line that "You raise funds for," I mean to say, "giving relief to the poor" or "to the suffering." Is there any instruction in Bhagavad-gita? You have read. Can you find out? But these people, they have become more learned than Krsna. In our country, Vivekananda: daridra-narayana-seva. The whole Ramakrishna Mission is collecting funds only on this rascal plea. --Srimad-Bhagavatam 2.9.4 -- Japan, April 22, 1972 Achintya Homepage: achintya DISCLAIMER: All postings appearing on Achintya are the property of their authors, and they may not be cross-posted to other forums without prior approval by said authors. Views expressed in Achintya postings are those of their authors only, and are not necessarily endorsed by the moderator or spiritual leaders of the Gaudiiya school. _____ * achintya/ * achintya <achintya?subject=Un> * <> Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2005 Report Share Posted April 24, 2005 Hare Krishna. Based on my reading of Srila Prabhupada's views on social welfare, etc. I think that taking one quote to the exclusion of the others does not project His Divine Grace's overall view on these issues. Srila Prabhupada was against mundane welfarism, i.e. welfarism that simply stopped at the point of providing bodily and mental comfort and did away with spiritual education. Since many organisations do these, he did not feel the need for another in the form of the Krishna Consciousness movement. What is lacking is authentic spiritual knowledge to enlighten the jiva as to its actual cause of suffering. But, Srila Prabhupada very much supported social welfare activities which had Krishna Consciousness as the basis. The 2 need not be made mutually exclusive if one sees everything as part of spiritual nature. Any social programme that incorporates Harinama, prasadam distribution and education in the higher values of life is welcome. The idea that Srila Prabhupada admonished was that which projected solutions as simply man-made in a God-given world. But spiritual welfarism that included concern for the bodily and mental welfare on the population on the basis of Krishna Consciousness was never shunned by him. Rather, he promoted it. Otherwise, why would there be the stress on varnashrama, prasadam distribution, etc.? As for the Sri Vaishnava Society's slogan, this is promoted by H.H. Tridandi Chinna Jeeyar Swami. However, he is not simply promoting the mayavada idea of daridra narayana seva. He is actually promoting the idea of social welfarism on the basis of engaging everyone in the service of the Lord and in that way providing both the physical and mental welfare of the people as well as their spiritual needs. He has begun Gita Jothi programme to propagate the teachings of the Bhagavad Gita. He also has massive gatherings of recitation of Vishnu Sahasranama, etc. Furthermore, he has established tribal schools in Andhra Pradesh a and is reaching out to the 'untouchables' and providing education and spiritual upliftment as well. A spiritual society that is totally callous to the social condition cannot effectively make people understand on a practical level the value of spiritual life. Srila Prabhupada also recognised that in his method of preaching. So, we do need to approach Srila Prabhupada's views and those of the other Vaishnava Acharyas on this matter in a holistic manner and not take one conversation in isolation. The views may be addressed towards replying to the views of the particular person who is presenting his or her ideas. But the overall view is to be made after a thorough study of the matter. All of us live within a larger social discourse/community. If we influence that with a very mature responsible lifestyle of care and concern on all levels, then people would also be attracted to listen to our spiritual teachings and understand that for the enlightened person, there is no segregation between spiritual teachings and practical lifestyles. All that is needed is an impregnation of Krishna Consciousness into everything sphere of life and activity, not a rejection but an add-on and dovetailing. My humble views on this matter. Please forgive me for any offences committed. Hari bol ! ys r. jai simman jakarta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2005 Report Share Posted April 25, 2005 This answer perfectly summarizes Srila Prabhupada's attitude. It is always dangerous to try to turn a quote into a philosophy. Rupa-vilasa dasa > Based on my reading of Srila Prabhupada's views on > social welfare, etc. I think that taking one quote to > the exclusion of the others does not project His > Divine Grace's overall view on these issues. > > Srila Prabhupada was against mundane welfarism, i.e. > welfarism that simply stopped at the point of > providing bodily and mental comfort and did away with > spiritual education. Since many organisations do > these, he did not feel the need for another in the > form of the Krishna Consciousness movement. What is > lacking is authentic spiritual knowledge to enlighten > the jiva as to its actual cause of suffering. > > But, Srila Prabhupada very much supported social > welfare activities which had Krishna Consciousness as > the basis. The 2 need not be made mutually exclusive > if one sees everything as part of spiritual nature. > Any social programme that incorporates Harinama, > prasadam distribution and education in the higher > values of life is welcome. The idea that Srila > Prabhupada admonished was that which projected > solutions as simply man-made in a God-given world. But > spiritual welfarism that included concern for the > bodily and mental welfare on the population on the > basis of Krishna Consciousness was never shunned by > him. Rather, he promoted it. Otherwise, why would > there be the stress on varnashrama, prasadam > distribution, etc.? > > As for the Sri Vaishnava Society's slogan, this is > promoted by H.H. Tridandi Chinna Jeeyar Swami. > However, he is not simply promoting the mayavada idea > of daridra narayana seva. He is actually promoting the > idea of social welfarism on the basis of engaging > everyone in the service of the Lord and in that way > providing both the physical and mental welfare of the > people as well as their spiritual needs. He has begun > Gita Jothi programme to propagate the teachings of the > Bhagavad Gita. He also has massive gatherings of > recitation of Vishnu Sahasranama, etc. Furthermore, he > has established tribal schools in Andhra Pradesh a and > is reaching out to the 'untouchables' and providing > education and spiritual upliftment as well. A > spiritual society that is totally callous to the > social condition cannot effectively make people > understand on a practical level the value of spiritual > life. Srila Prabhupada also recognised that in his > method of preaching. > > So, we do need to approach Srila Prabhupada's views > and those of the other Vaishnava Acharyas on this > matter in a holistic manner and not take one > conversation in isolation. The views may be addressed > towards replying to the views of the particular person > who is presenting his or her ideas. But the overall > view is to be made after a thorough study of the > matter. All of us live within a larger social > discourse/community. If we influence that with a very > mature responsible lifestyle of care and concern on > all levels, then people would also be attracted to > listen to our spiritual teachings and understand that > for the enlightened person, there is no segregation > between spiritual teachings and practical lifestyles. > All that is needed is an impregnation of Krishna > Consciousness into everything sphere of life and > activity, not a rejection but an add-on and > dovetailing. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2005 Report Share Posted April 25, 2005 I just wanted to share some context. Recently in India there were some devotees claiming that "the greatest service to Lord Krishna is to feed a hungry child." Apparently there is some project separate from Food for Life being conducted by brahmacharis there who are (I think but am not sure) making money from it. I think that's why BV Swami posted these quotes from Prabhupada. We have to differentiate between mundane welfare work and real welfare work. Unfortunately, some devotees are not making the distinction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2005 Report Share Posted April 25, 2005 I think it is a question of consciousness more than the activity itself. Even devotees who take part in food for life programs, if they are not in proper consciousness, it is not going to have the desired effect of *feeding* the soul. The case you have cited is a great example. The key for those interested in both social service and Krishna consciousness is to cultivate KC internally, very nicely and then venture out serving others. Also, it is important to note that social service that is done in a selfless manner is going to bring people to the platform of goodness and it is highly likely they will take up KC - so, KC and service to others work hand-in-hand. I was once having a nice conversation with a devotee who has been doing the food for life for years - he said that welfare work if done in proper consciousness (that Krishna is the supreme enjoyer etc.) will purify our heart, which in turn results in real KC activities - without that purification, even if we wear nice devotee dress and engage in food for life, it doesn't matter. There are also KC devotees who avoid doing any kind of social service because they think it would result in unnecessary karma - I have noticed that such devotees are more concerned with their own spiritual welfare than serving others. So, SP's quotes are meant to break our strong illusion that we are not this body, but spirit souls and to drive home the point that welfare activity is a question of proper consciousness. I find his statements to be true and applicable, irrespective of context. One only needs to understand SPs intention and maharaj's before getting emotional about them. iys Aravind. krishna_susarla <krishna_susarla wrote: I just wanted to share some context. Recently in India there were some devotees claiming that "the greatest service to Lord Krishna is to feed a hungry child." Apparently there is some project separate from Food for Life being conducted by brahmacharis there who are (I think but am not sure) making money from it. I think that's why BV Swami posted these quotes from Prabhupada. We have to differentiate between mundane welfare work and real welfare work. Unfortunately, some devotees are not making the distinction. Achintya Homepage: achintya DISCLAIMER: All postings appearing on Achintya are the property of their authors, and they may not be cross-posted to other forums without prior approval by said authors. Views expressed in Achintya postings are those of their authors only, and are not necessarily endorsed by the moderator or spiritual leaders of the Gaudiiya school. achintya/ achintya Aravind Mohanram Ph.D. Candidate Dept. of Mat Sci and Engg., Penn State University, University Park, PA 16801 www.personal.psu.edu/aum105 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.