Guest guest Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 Hare Krishna, i have doubt regarding this.please clarify this. "is Lord Parasurama an empowered living entity or the direct incarnation of Supreme Lord" in the book "The Teachings of Lord Chaitanya",it is said that Parasurama is an empowered Living Entity. please also tell me about Lord Buddha Hare Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2005 Report Share Posted June 11, 2005 Hare Krishna! Srimad Bhagavatam 1.3.20 states: "Lord Visnu appeared as Parasuräma, the sixteenth avatära, and freed the earth from the ksatriyas (the courageous valiant class, which has the capacity to control the wicked and protect the virtuous) twenty-one times, as He was angry with them because of their rebellion against the brähmanas (the highest class endowed with comprehensive wisdom who give impartial advice to the ksatriyas to help them rule)." In the Sri Caitanya Caritämåta, Madhya-lila 20.246 Anubhasya commentary of Srila Bhakti Siddhänta Sarasvati Gosvämi Thäkura, Parasuräma has been enumerated as one of the saktyavesävatäras (a descent of the Lord's extraordinary power). Parasuräma is the manifested form of the power to suppress miscreants. Harinam Cintamani, Laghu Bhagavatamrta and various other scriptures count Lord Parasurama as saktyavesavatara. Yet, He is counted among lila-avataras also in some scriptures. Lord Buddha is described as the direct avatara of Supreme Lord. However some scriptures also count Him as an avesa avatara. Most importantly, the Siddartha Buddha is different from the Supreme Lord Buddha. "It is said that Säkyasimha Buddha, who is the son of Suddhodana and Mäyä, and the Buddha avatära Who is the Vaisnavas' Object of adoration, are not one and the same person. Our Most Revered Nityaliläpravista Om Visnupäda 108 Sri Srimad Bhakti Siddhänta Sarasvati Gosvämi Prabhupäda has clearly said, "Säkyasimha Buddha was merely a vastly learned person, so we cannot call him the original Buddha or Lord Buddha." - Dasavatara book by Srila B.B. Tirtha Goswami Maharaj. In service Hari Prasad Das > Message: 1 > Tue, 07 Jun 2005 06:21:51 -0000 > "manoj kumar" <manoj_7777 > is Lord Parasurama an empowered living entity or a direct > incarnation > > Hare Krishna, > i have doubt regarding this.please clarify this. > "is Lord Parasurama an empowered living entity or the direct > incarnation of Supreme Lord" > in the book "The Teachings of Lord Chaitanya",it is said > that Parasurama is an empowered Living Entity. > please also tell me about Lord Buddha > Hare Krishna > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Hare Krishna Prabhu, please explain the point "siddartha buddha is different from the actural Lord Buddha".this is an entirely new thing for me Hare Krishna achintya, "Hemant Agrawal" <hemant_itbhu@h...> wrote: > Hare Krishna! > > Srimad Bhagavatam 1.3.20 states: "Lord Visnu appeared as Parasuräma, the > sixteenth avatära, and freed the earth from the ksatriyas (the courageous > valiant class, which has the capacity to control the wicked and protect the > virtuous) twenty-one times, as He was angry with them because of their > rebellion against the brähmanas (the highest class endowed with > comprehensive wisdom who give impartial advice to the ksatriyas to help them > rule)." > > In the Sri Caitanya Caritämåta, Madhya-lila 20.246 Anubhasya commentary of > Srila Bhakti Siddhänta Sarasvati Gosvämi Thäkura, Parasuräma has been > enumerated as one of the saktyavesävatäras (a descent of the Lord's > extraordinary power). Parasuräma is the manifested form of the power to > suppress miscreants. > > Harinam Cintamani, Laghu Bhagavatamrta and various other scriptures count > Lord Parasurama as saktyavesavatara. Yet, He is counted among lila-avataras > also in some scriptures. > > Lord Buddha is described as the direct avatara of Supreme Lord. However some > scriptures also count Him as an avesa avatara. Most importantly, the > Siddartha Buddha is different from the Supreme Lord Buddha. > > "It is said that Säkyasimha Buddha, who is the son of Suddhodana and Mäyä, > and the Buddha avatära Who is the Vaisnavas' Object of adoration, are not > one and the same person. Our Most Revered Nityaliläpravista Om Visnupäda 108 > Sri Srimad Bhakti Siddhänta Sarasvati Gosvämi Prabhupäda has clearly said, > "Säkyasimha Buddha was merely a vastly learned person, so we cannot call him > the original Buddha or Lord Buddha." - Dasavatara book by Srila B.B. Tirtha > Goswami Maharaj. > > In service > Hari Prasad Das > > > > Message: 1 > > Tue, 07 Jun 2005 06:21:51 -0000 > > "manoj kumar" <manoj_7777> > > is Lord Parasurama an empowered living entity or a direct > > incarnation > > > > Hare Krishna, > > i have doubt regarding this.please clarify this. > > "is Lord Parasurama an empowered living entity or the direct > > incarnation of Supreme Lord" > > in the book "The Teachings of Lord Chaitanya",it is said > > that Parasurama is an empowered Living Entity. > > please also tell me about Lord Buddha > > Hare Krishna > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2005 Report Share Posted June 15, 2005 Dandavat Pranams! Following are some reference from the Dasavatar book of Srila Bhakti Ballabh Tirtha Goswami Maharaj. ---------- It is said that Sakyasimha Buddha, who is the son of Suddhodana and Maya, and the Buddha avatara Who is the Vaisnavas' Object of adoration, are not one and the same person. Our Most Revered Nityalilapravista Om Visnupada 108 Sri Srimad Bhakti Siddhanta Sarasvati Gosvami Prabhupada has clearly said, "Sakyasimha Buddha was merely a vastly learned person, so we cannot call him the original Buddha or Lord Buddha." "Thereafter, in the twenty-first manvantara at the beginning of Kali-yuga, the Lord will appear as Lord Buddha, the son of Aïjana, in the kikat pradesh (province of Gaya -Bihar), just for the purpose of deluding those who are envious of the faithful demigods." "Lord Buddha deluded the wicked natured people by establishing scriptures opposed to the Vedas in His 'asura-vimohana-lila' (the pastime of hypnotizing the demons). "Save me Lord Buddha from the terrible offence of disobeying the Vedas due to ignorance of their secret meanings". Factually, Lord Buddha is not a condemner of the Vedas for any reason whatsoever. This pastime is meant only to mesmerize the demons. " "Gautama's father's name was Suddhodana and His mother's name was Mayadevi. Aïjana's son and Maya's son both share the same name but one appeared at Gaya and the other at Kapilavastu. Thus, the appearance places and parents of Visnu Buddha and Gautama Buddha are totally different. Because the human Buddha was unable to understand the asura-vimohana-lila of Lord Visnu Buddha, he propagated anti-Vedic nihilism." In service Hari Prasad das Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:19:16 -0000 "manoj kumar" <manoj_7777 Re:is Lord Parasurama an empowered living entity or a direct incarnation Hare Krishna Prabhu, please explain the point "siddartha buddha is different from the actural Lord Buddha".this is an entirely new thing for me Hare Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.