Guest guest Posted August 31, 2005 Report Share Posted August 31, 2005 Hare Krishna, Padma Purana Uttara Khanda 227.41 states: yo'sau nirguna ityuktah sAstresu jagadishvarah prAkrtairhaiyasamyuktair gunairhinatvamucyate !! In the scriptures when the lord of the Universe is said to be devoid of qualities (Nirguna) it means that He has no detestable material qualities. Ahirbudhnya samhita 2.55 says aprakrtagunasparsam nirgunam parigiyate srnu narada sadgunyam Nirguna means non-material Guna or spiritual qualities. when the sastras themselves say that Nirguna means beyond the 3 modes, what is the necessity for the advaitins to call something as saguna and something as Nirguna. According to the puranas, suddha sattva means Nirguna. There is no difference between them.Any comments? dasa Narasimhan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2005 Report Share Posted August 31, 2005 Hare Hare Dandavat pranam ji. Here let the satra comment: Katha Up. 1.3.10: Higher than senses >sense objects >mind >buddhi >soul >avyakta. Then it says: avyakta purusah para purusa na param kincit sa kastha para gatah. The Purusa, the Personality of Godhead, is superior to the Avyakta. He is the ultimate Entity beyond Avyakta, the supreme goal. I think this one shlok is enough for the staunch followers of the Vedas and Upanisads. There is no less, less, less = 0 (mayavad or shunyavad). Rather, Above the formless and quality-less Brahman is Parabrahman. He is the ultimate highest goal. It would be nice that somebody gives the word for word translations and purports to Gopal tapani Upanisad. Ram Ram. ranganathan narasimhan <simhan74 wrote: Hare Krishna, Padma Purana Uttara Khanda 227.41 states: yo'sau nirguna ityuktah sAstresu jagadishvarah prAkrtairhaiyasamyuktair gunairhinatvamucyate !! In the scriptures when the lord of the Universe is said to be devoid of qualities (Nirguna) it means that He has no detestable material qualities. Ahirbudhnya samhita 2.55 says aprakrtagunasparsam nirgunam parigiyate srnu narada sadgunyam Nirguna means non-material Guna or spiritual qualities. when the sastras themselves say that Nirguna means beyond the 3 modes, what is the necessity for the advaitins to call something as saguna and something as Nirguna. According to the puranas, suddha sattva means Nirguna. There is no difference between them.Any comments? dasa Narasimhan Achintya Homepage: achintya DISCLAIMER: All postings appearing on Achintya are the property of their authors, and they may not be cross-posted to other forums without prior approval by said authors. Views expressed in Achintya postings are those of their authors only, and are not necessarily endorsed by the moderator or spiritual leaders of the Gaudiiya school. Hinduism Hinduism religion Different religions beliefs Visit your group "achintya" on the web. achintya Mail - You care about security. So do we. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 achintya, avadhuta raya <avadhutaraya> wrote: > Hare Hare > I think this one shlok is enough for the staunch followers of the Vedas and Upanisads. There is no less, less, less = 0 (mayavad or shunyavad). Rather, Above the formless and quality-less Brahman is Parabrahman. > Brahmajyoti is formless but not "quality-less." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Hare Hare Thank you for your remark. <Brahmajyoti is formless but not "quality-less." Srila Prabhupada writes that Brahman is nirguna, without qualities. Srimad Bhagavatam 11.15.17 mentions: nirgune—without qualities; brahmani—in Brahman; mayi—in Me - Krishna's nirguna Brahman. Any comments? Tnx ARd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Hare krishna, Some advaitins claim that statements like Satyasya satyam or Satyam Param in Srimad Bhagavatham establish gradations in Satya and hence vindicate sankara's theory of 3 levels of sathyam. Any comments? avadhuta raya <avadhutaraya wrote: Hare Hare Dandavat pranam ji. Here let the satra comment: Katha Up. 1.3.10: Higher than senses >sense objects >mind >buddhi >soul >avyakta. Then it says: avyakta purusah para purusa na param kincit sa kastha para gatah. The Purusa, the Personality of Godhead, is superior to the Avyakta. He is the ultimate Entity beyond Avyakta, the supreme goal. I think this one shlok is enough for the staunch followers of the Vedas and Upanisads. There is no less, less, less = 0 (mayavad or shunyavad). Rather, Above the formless and quality-less Brahman is Parabrahman. He is the ultimate highest goal. It would be nice that somebody gives the word for word translations and purports to Gopal tapani Upanisad. Ram Ram. ranganathan narasimhan wrote: Hare Krishna, Padma Purana Uttara Khanda 227.41 states: yo'sau nirguna ityuktah sAstresu jagadishvarah prAkrtairhaiyasamyuktair gunairhinatvamucyate !! In the scriptures when the lord of the Universe is said to be devoid of qualities (Nirguna) it means that He has no detestable material qualities. Ahirbudhnya samhita 2.55 says aprakrtagunasparsam nirgunam parigiyate srnu narada sadgunyam Nirguna means non-material Guna or spiritual qualities. when the sastras themselves say that Nirguna means beyond the 3 modes, what is the necessity for the advaitins to call something as saguna and something as Nirguna. According to the puranas, suddha sattva means Nirguna. There is no difference between them.Any comments? dasa Narasimhan Achintya Homepage: achintya DISCLAIMER: All postings appearing on Achintya are the property of their authors, and they may not be cross-posted to other forums without prior approval by said authors. Views expressed in Achintya postings are those of their authors only, and are not necessarily endorsed by the moderator or spiritual leaders of the Gaudiiya school. Hinduism Hinduism religion Different religions beliefs Visit your group "achintya" on the web. achintya Mail - You care about security. So do we. Achintya Homepage: achintya DISCLAIMER: All postings appearing on Achintya are the property of their authors, and they may not be cross-posted to other forums without prior approval by said authors. Views expressed in Achintya postings are those of their authors only, and are not necessarily endorsed by the moderator or spiritual leaders of the Gaudiiya school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Hare Krishna Dandavats In the beginning middle and the and in the whole Srimad Bhagavatam is only the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Sri Krishna glorified. HERE ARE SOME COMMMNTS ON ATYA FROM BALADEVA VIDYABHUSANA The word satya is famous as a name for the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Visnu. The scriptures use the word satya in this way. For example, the Taittiréya Upaniñad (2.1.2) says satyaà jAnam anantam (the unlimited Supreme Personality of Godhead is full of transcendental knowledge) and the Srimad-BhAgavatam (1.1.1) says satyam param dhimahi (I meditate on the Supreme Personality of Godhead). The word satyena is in the instrumental case to show in the sense of "because." The meaning here is that one becomes an ativAdi (wise man) because of the satya, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The person who meditates on prAna is called an ativAdi (wise man) because he is wise in comparison to they who meditate on the series of objects mentioned previously, beginning with prAëa and culminating in hope. But he who meditates on Lord Visnu is superior to the person who meditates on prAëa. Therefore he who meditates on Lord Visnu is the real, the best ativAdi (wise man). CONCLUSION THE SUPREME LORD'S FORM IS NOT AN IMAGINARY CONVENIENCE MEANT ONLY FOR CONCENTRATING THE MIND. THE UPANISADS (WITH WORDS LIKE SATYA, JNANA, ANANTA AND ANANDA) POINT TO HIS TRANSCENDENTAL FORM AS THE HIGHEST REALITY. HIS FORM IS NOT DIFFERENT FROM HIS TRANSCENDENTAL, BLISSFUL SELF. (Vs. 3.2.16) 10.13.54 satya jnananantananda- matraika-rasa-murtayah asprsta-bhuri-mahatmya api hy upanisad-drsam satya--eternal; jnana--having full knowledge; ananta--unlimited; ananda--fully blissful; matra--only; eka-rasa--always existing; murtayah--forms; asprsta-bhuri-mahatmyah--whose great glory is not touched; api--even; hi--because; upanisat-drsam--by those jnanis who are engaged in studying the Upanisads. TRANSLATION The visnu-murtis all had eternal, unlimited forms, full of knowledge and bliss and existing beyond the influence of time. Their great glory was not even to be touched by the jnanis engaged in studying the Upanisads. CHANDOGYA UPANISAD SIXTEENTH KHANDA 1. 'But in reality he is an ativadin who declares the Highest Being to be the True (Satya).' SATYA IS ALWAYS ACCOMPANIED BY TARA The explanation of the word Sita From the Sita Upanisad goes as follows: Text 4 sakarah satyam amrtam praptih somas ca kirtyate takaras tara-laksmya ca vairajah prastarah smrta sakarah - the letter s; satyam - satyam; amrtam - eternity; praptih - attainment; somah - the moon; ca - and; kirtyate - is saud; takarah - the letter t; tara - of the sacred syllable Om; laksmya - with the goddess of fortune; ca - and; vairajah - the universal form; prastarah - manifested; smrta - considered. The letter S stands for satya" which means immortality" The letter TA stands for tara" which means the Supreme Personality of Godhead who is accompanied by the goddess of fortune". In the Smrti-sAstra it is said: satya-jnAnantAnanda-mAtraika-rasa-mUrtayah "The forms of the Supreme Lord are undivided. They are all full of eternity, knowledge, infinity, and bliss." CONFIRMATION BY VEDANTA SUTRA sa iva hi satyadayaH sA - she; eva - indeed; hi - indeed; satya - truth; Adayah - beginning with. Indeed, she is those that begin with truth. Purport by Srila Baladeva VidyabhUSana In the SvetAsvatara Upanisad (6.8) it is said: parAsya saktih "The Supreme has a potency that is spiritual." IN THE HIGHEST SENSE THE WORD SATYA REFERS ONLY TO KRISHNA 10.2.26 satya-vratam satya-param tri-satyam satyasya yonim nihitam ca satye satyasya satyam rta-satya-netram satyatmakam tvam saranam prapannah satya-vratam--the Personality of Godhead, who never deviates from His vow; satya-param--who is the Absolute Truth (as stated in the beginning of Srimad-Bhagavatam, satyam param dhimahi); tri-satyam--He is always present as the Absolute Truth, before the creation of this cosmic manifestation, during its maintenance, and even after its annihilation; satyasya--of all relative truths, which are emanations from the Absolute Truth, Krsna; yonim--the cause; nihitam--entered; ca--and; satye--in the factors that create this material world (namely, the five elements--earth, water, fire, air and ether); satyasya--of all that is accepted as the truth; satyam--the Lord is the original truth; rta-satya-netram--He is the origin of whatever truth is pleasi ng (sunetram); satya-atmakam--everything pertaining to the Lord is truth (sac-cid-ananda: His body is truth, His knowledge is truth, and His pleasure is truth); tvam--unto you, O Lord; saranam--offering our full surrender; prapannah--we are completely under Your protection. TRANSLATION The demigods prayed: O Lord, You never deviate from Your vow, which is always perfect because whatever You decide is perfectly correct and cannot be stopped by anyone. Being present in the three phases of cosmic manifestation--creation, maintenance and annihilation--You are the Supreme Truth. Indeed, unless one is completely truthful, one cannot achieve Your favor, which therefore cannot be achieved by hypocrites. You are the active principle, the real truth, in all the ingredients of creation, and therefore you are known as antaryami, the inner force. You are equal to everyone, and Your instructions apply for everyone, for all time. You are the beginning of all truth. Therefore, offering our obeisances, we surrender unto You. Kindly give us protection. ranganathan narasimhan <simhan74 wrote: Hare krishna, Some advaitins claim that statements like Satyasya satyam or Satyam Param in Srimad Bhagavatham establish gradations in Satya and hence vindicate sankara's theory of 3 levels of sathyam. Any comments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.