Guest guest Posted October 8, 2005 Report Share Posted October 8, 2005 Dear Prabhus, Humble obeisances. Jaya Srila Prabhupada. I've been through all the threads I could find on Lord Shiva's ontological position (as gunavatara & as Sadaashiva). Frankly, they left me a little confused. But before I rehash a hackneyed question, the first question below wasn't dealt with in those threads. I would appreciate it if devotees could clarify: 1) What exactly is Guru-tattva? What is the relationship between Shiva-tattva and Guru-tattva? I've heard Guru-tattva being identified with Sankarshana, and also sometimes with Shiva. I've also seen an identity relationship being expressed between Sadaashiva and Sankarshana. Can someone clarify? 2) I still cannot understand how a pariNaama kind of relationship can exist between Vishnu-tattva and Shiva-tattva, while keeping the doctrine of immutability of Brahman in tact. Thanks in advance. Hare Krishna. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 achintya, "webasura" <rind_19> wrote: > 2) I still cannot understand how a pariNaama kind of relationship > can exist between Vishnu-tattva and Shiva-tattva, while keeping the > doctrine of immutability of Brahman in tact. > I'm certainly no expert, but I thought the concept of "transformation" is simply being used to illustrate the *relationship* between Vishnu and Shiva. In other words, not that Vishnu literally "transforms" into Shiva (both Sadaashiva and Vishnu being eternal), but rather that Shiva, being neither Vishnu nor jiiva, is like a "transformed" Vishnu or in other words a unique entity in an in-between position. Again, that is merely my opinion. It could be just speculation on my part, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 Pranams Hare are some of my notes on Siva tattva that might be interesting for u. Hare krishna. ARd # When rAm was worshipping Siva near sea-side before going to lankA, He gave Lord Siva, the name -- rAmeSvara. hanumAn asked the purport of the name. Lord rAm said: rAmasya ISvarah, sah rAmeSvara | He, who is the Lord of rAm, is rAmeSvara. Lord Siva was watching all this from kailASa. When he heard the meaning of rAmeSvara given by rAmchandra, he laughed mildly. pArvati devI was sitting beside Him, she asked why He was laughing. Lord Siva said, look at the lIlA of the Supreme Lord, what games he plays with his devotees. Now he has made his servant, his master by changing the meaning of rAmeSvara. pArvati devI asked, then what is the meaning of rAmeSvara. Lord Siva said: rAma yasya ISvarah, sah rAmeSvara | He, whose Lord is rAma, is rAmeSvarah # from Brahma Vaivarta Purana in relation to Lord Siva. "Lord Siva is said to be a portion of Lord Krishna and arise out of the left side of Krshna's body. "vAmarddhAGgo mahAdevo dakSiNo gopikApatiH" The left half became Siva and the right became the Husband of Gopis. He is dearly loved by Krishna. The BVP says it is sin to slander Siva, Who is dearer to Krishna than His own life. Krishna Himself declares: "Among my favorites Brahma is dear to Me. Lakshmi, ever residing on my chest, is dearer than Brahma. Radha is yet dearer, and my devotees are dearer still. Dearest of all is Shankara (Siva); no one is dearer than He. My heart resides with my devotees, My life with Radha. My Self with Sankara, who is dearer than My life." THERE IS THE ORIGINAL SIVA IN SIVALOKA AND... This abode of Lord Siva’s is not a creation of Maya. In Sivaloka there is no unhappiness. That world is attained by the best of Lord Siva’s devotees - the ones who understand him to be non-different from Sri Krsna - not the Saivites who are karmis or jnanis or who worship Lord Siva as an independent supreme controller. The followers of Lord Siva whom Naarada saw on Sivaloka were all great Vaisnavas who deeply imbibed their master's mood of visnu-bhakti. Lord Siva praised them for their artistic accompaniment, especially his consort Paarvati for herhand-clapping, because their performance was manifested directly from pure devotion. (Source unknown - somebody know it?) >From Laghu Bhagavatamrita 28 Siva appears in eleven forms and eight forms. Generally he has ten arms and five heads, with three eyes on each head. 27 The scriptures explain that, as Brahma is, so Siva is sometimes a jiva soul and sometimes an amsa-avatara like Lord Sesa. Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 >the concept of "transformation" > is simply being used to illustrate the *relationship* between Vishnu > and Shiva. In other words, not that Vishnu literally "transforms" into > Shiva That makes sense. Is this relationship between Vishnu and Sadaashiva, or between Vishnu and the GuNaavatara Shiva? How is Sadaashiva related to Sankarshana? And how does "Guru-tattva" figure in all of this? Hare Krishna. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.