Humble Request.

[Guest guest]

I offer my hmble obeisances to all the members of the group,

Here I'm expressing my views that seem to me as Mayavada in Gaudia Vaishnava

Philosophy. I request U plz to throw light on this subject matter.

 

1.It accepts all avataas are not of full knowledge and bliss (avataras of Lord

Krishna).

 

Lord Buddha not same as Krishna. So krishna is superior in terms of attributes

possesed compared to Buddha.This is what I mean from above.Is it not possible

that Lord Krishna is inherent in Lord Buddha.

 

2.Jiva as part and parcel of of Superme personality of Godhead

How is this possible, is it not part of ultimate purity is Supreme pure

whole.

 

3.In Gaudia philosophy there exisits a concept of Svaamsha and Vibhinna

Amsha.

 

Vibhinna Amsha means part and parcel do you agree this statement of Srila

Prabhupaad.

Lord's Amsha is not diffrent from Lord in other words its Lord only. His legs

his eyes are not different from him. A part of supreme is not different from the

whole. So it is the Supreme itself. In other words its equivalent to say that

i'm God. Hence mayavada.

If Bhagavan's part and parcel(Bhagavan) are to suffer in the material world in

the gutters of street it doesn't behold the position of Lord in other words

Bhagavan is not jnanamai and anandamai. This is what I mean!!!

 

4.Here jiva before coming into material World are accepted as to be as pure as

Lord himself.

I'm not convinced withthis statement of Prabhupaad.

 

5. Jiva is accepted as a drop in mighty ocean which are susceptible to come

under the influence of,Maya.But the Supreme Lord doesn't come under it. .

Since both Lord and jiva are from the same ocean(example). Why only jiva(drop)

why not Lord(mighty)?. Quality and quantity both are one and the same in terms

of Ultimate pure.

In otherwords lord's minute divine purity (jiva) is trapped in maya is

equivalent to Lord's part getting trapped in maya is equivalent to Lord getting

trapped!?. This what my understanding is.

 

 

6. Jivas original nature is accepted as Shudda sattva.

I've not got how?.

 

7. It follows Vishistadvaitic Traditions more than

that of Madhva Traditions. It mentions many of the Madhva Yatis

in the lineage but do follow do have links with Ramanuja's philosophy than

Madhva?.

 

Plz throw light on this matter.

 

8.Jivas are said to be exisiting at thatastha and at

this position jivas are said to be as pure as Lord!.

Plz throw light on this matter.

 

 

9. It is accepted here, as in Ramanuja tradition

that jivas are in indolent state before comng to the

Material World. Jivas are given the free will

(liberty) to select wether Vaikunta or Material world.

Plz throw light on this matter.

 

Expecting reply,

All glories to Nitai

Gauranga.

 

 

Send instant messages to your online friends http://in.messenger.