Guest guest Posted April 8, 2006 Report Share Posted April 8, 2006 In the verse SB 1.3.6 it is stated "sa eva prathamam deva". Who is referred to as sa here? It is clear from 1.2.27-28 that it is Vasudeva. vāsudeva-parā vedā vāsudeva-parā makhāḥ vāsudeva-parā yogā vāsudeva- parāḥ kriyāḥ vāsudeva-paraḿ jñānaḿ vāsudeva-paraḿ tapaḥ vāsudeva-paro dharmo vāsudeva-parā gatiḥ It is this Vasudeva who actually appears as purusha and creates this universe (SB 1.3.4 and SB 1.3.5). So even without going to SB 1.3.28, it is possible to establish that Vasudeva is the source of all incarnations. That Vasudeva refers to the son of Devaki and Vasudeva is stated by Sankara though some vaishnavas dispute that. So be it. Now, if it is already established in SB 1.3.6 that Vasudeva is the source of all incarnations, why should SB 1.3.28 re-state the fact saying krishnas tu bhagavan svayam? One is stessing the important points just like Chandogya Upaishad stresses tat tvam asi so many times because it is important - a maha vakya. It is also because the purusha lying down in the karana ocean, not incarnates as kaumaras, narada, sages, rama, narasimha, krishna etc., but he also creates 16 material principles (SB 1.3.1). So why should it SB 1.3.28 say krishnas tu bhagavan svayam? krishna also means existence and bliss - Sankara quotes references for this in his sahasranama bhashya. So this verse SB 1.3.28 state that the bhagavan (Vasudeva and His amsas) are verily the existence. Thus He is differentiated from the 16 material principles referred to in SB 1.3.1 and bodies of humans, animals and plants produced from these material elements (maya). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.