Guest guest Posted January 24, 2002 Report Share Posted January 24, 2002 Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:11:21 -0800 (PST) ranganathan narasimhan <simhan74 Urgent doubts > but one crucial point is, he says there is > not one quotation about Lord Chaitanya , that can be > sighted, infact, he says there is no quotation at > all in any Scripture about him. If it's particularly the scriptural proofs of Lord Chaitanya's identity you want, then you might lke to view these websites: Sri Caitanya Upanisad: http://harekrsna.com/pancha/caitanya/upanisad.htm Caitanya Simhera: http://harekrsna.com/pancha/caitanya/simhera.htm (this is very good!!) Predictions Part 1: http://acbspn.com/godhead/gaura_1predictions.htm Predictions Part 2: http://acbspn.com/godhead/gaura_2predictions.htm The last three websites specifically contain quotes from Srimad Bhagavatam, as well as quotes from numerous other Shastras also. > 2) Can we say on the basis of the quote" Dehi-deha > vibhedoyam nengate Isvare Kvacit" that the Srira- > Sariri concept of Srivaishnavas cannot be > applied to the Lord as his sarira is non-different > from him ? What does that shloka mean and where can it be found? In service of Gaura-Nitai, Sanjay ===== "Radha-Krishna prana mora jugala-kisora, jivane marane gati aro nahi mora." "The divine couple, Sri Radha and Krsna, are my life and soul. In life or death I have no other refuge but Them." -- Srila Narottama Dasa Thakura Great stuff seeking new owners in Auctions! http://auctions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2002 Report Share Posted January 25, 2002 On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Sanjay Dadlani wrote: > > 2) Can we say on the basis of the quote" Dehi-deha > > vibhedoyam nengate Isvare Kvacit" that the Srira- > > Sariri concept of Srivaishnavas cannot be > > applied to the Lord as his sarira is non-different > > from him ? > > What does that shloka mean and where can it be found? Srila Prabhupada quotes it in Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila 5.41, among other places. I've seen it as: dehI-deha-vibhedo 'yaM nezvare vidyate kvacit which means: "In the Lord, there's never any such distinction between self and body." It seems to parallel the acintya-bhedabheda tattva which holds the Lord and His name to be one, yet also distinct; to express such inconceivable truths, we often use the term, "nondifferent." It's also similar to another idea among some schools, that the Personality of Godhead is "saguna" rather than "nirguna." In fact, Bhagavan is *only* nirguna--and not saguna (cf. Bhagavata 10.88.5, also cited in Cc., and see 11.25.25 too). However, words like "rupa,guna,kama," etc., are often used antithetically, which can be confusing for us. MDd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.