Guest guest Posted July 26, 2002 Report Share Posted July 26, 2002 Dear Subal das, Yasodanandana das and all prabhus, Please accept my humble obeisances at the lotus feet of Srila Prabhupada. Regarding the subject of Spirit/Soul... one way to explain it is going to the Lord's words in Bhagavad-gita. That which is 'me', that which is 'you'.. that is atma (spiritsoul), and is eternal. The symptoms of the presense of atma are the same regardless of the body, for without spiritsoul there can be no growth, no movemment, no reproduction, no being 'alive.' The quality of atma is equal even to that of Krsna ; only the quantity is different. One point that has helped my Christian mother and sister understand this concept came up when discussing the inevitable 'death' of a pet dog many years ago. My mother was stating that her dog has 'no soul'... so I asked, "What happens when she dies? Does she just run out of gas like a car? No... her 'life force'.. her 'self'... leaves her body. " There is also a part of the church service I recall from my growing up that may be used in most churches and therefore might help make the point... : "Praise God from whom all blessings flow. Praise Him all creatures here below. Praise him above, ye heavenly host...."... and so on... "Praise Him all creatures here below" If a being is not part and parcel of God, why would there be a calling to praise Him? This line does not say.. "Praise Him all humans here below." ... It COULD have... just as easily.. but it does not... Also, if one is a follower of Christ, who is shaktavesh avatar, that needs to be respected. As devotees, we know that one is not converted to Krsna consciousness but awakened to Krsna consciousness. Prasadam.. kirtan... These are the weapons against maya. So gentle persuading.. logical Vaishnava argument and lots of prasadam...<s>.... In any case, I try to remember always that Krsna tells us "Everyone follows My path in all respects.".. and that He "...is directing the wanderings of all living entities..."... Whether or not it is understood who Krsna is, He is still the Supreme Personality of Godhead... We are so fortunate to have begun awakening to our original Krsna consciousness by the mercy of Srila Prabhupada and all Vaishnavas. Hoping something here is useful in your preaching. Sincerely your servant, Bhuvana Pavani d.d. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2002 Report Share Posted July 27, 2002 Regarding preaching to Christians: Since Christians don't accept the same pramaanas that we do, it may be difficult to engage in dialogue with them. The underlying assumptions of each tradition are different. The best way to reach them, I think, is to use logic and analogy the way Srila Prabhupada did, and then later back it up with quotations from our scriptures. Regarding Jesus being a shaktyavesha avataara, I think there may be some statements by Srila Prabhupada to this effect, as there are statements by him indicating that he is a pure devotee, an empowered servant of Krishna, etc. However, objectively speaking, it is difficult to prove these points, since a disciple must know the scriptural basis behind his guru's teachings. Even more dangerous in making these claims is the inadvertent justification of some of Jesus' behavior which might not be consistent with Vedic injunctions or Vaishnava ethics. Indeed, it will likely be seen as hypocritical by other Vedic schools of thought, to give so much regard to non- Vedic prophets who do not follow scriptural regulations, as compared to respectable gurus in other sampradaayas like Shankara, etc. The best thing, as always, is to refrain from reinterpreting anyone else's religion and simply preach Krishna-consciousness as it is. If members of other religions like what they hear, then they can reexamine/reinterpret their own scriptures as they choose. It's not our responsibility to justify things according to non-Vedic scriptures. regards, - K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 10, 2002 Report Share Posted August 10, 2002 Harekrishna ....but in western countries we have to answer some questions about jesus and we ourselves must have an idea about the religion in wich we were born.... the personality of Jesus is easily judgeable by His acts. I am a christian born, i have a little more than average culture of gospels and bible and i cannot find behaviours of Lord Jesus not in line with the vaishnava siddhantas. If some vedic practitioners and scholars are not at ease with jesus, this is their problem...... we will not bring uselessly this subject when discussing with them but i do not understand in wich way we'd be considered in a bad way if we glorify jesus, as Srila Prabhupada often did. Of course we are vaishnavas and Srimad Bhagavatam, Caitanya C., Bh.Gita ecc. are our scriptures and there is no need to refer to the Bible or Gospel (or Coran and Buddhist Sutras) when there is not a real and specific need........ but again, i'd find very strange to find vedic practitioners who are not aware of the greatness of jesus obviously we know also that there are Puranas speaking specifically of jesus, Buddha and Mohamed ........ , the simple word God, knowing the science of vedas, is extremely generic.... Srila Prabhupada accepts the jesus's statement : "who sees me, sees the Father", in this way, i have not any difficulty, preaching to christians that make such questions at the sunday feast or so, to answer YES Jesus is GOD, then it is possible to continue with other important topics, without having anyone feeling offended, and without have said a lie........... when one will be introduced to the more specific and complex science of the infinite personalities emanated by Krishna, it will not very difficult to reconciliate these aspects. harekrishna yasodanandanadasa florence italy Regarding preaching to Christians: Since Christians don't accept the same pramaanas that we do, it may be difficult to engage in dialogue with them. The underlying assumptions of each tradition are different. The best way to reach them, I think, is to use logic and analogy the way Srila Prabhupada did, and then later back it up with quotations from our scriptures. Regarding Jesus being a shaktyavesha avataara, I think there may be some statements by Srila Prabhupada to this effect, as there are statements by him indicating that he is a pure devotee, an empowered servant of Krishna, etc. However, objectively speaking, it is difficult to prove these points, since a disciple must know the scriptural basis behind his guru's teachings. Even more dangerous in making these claims is the inadvertent justification of some of Jesus' behavior which might not be consistent with Vedic injunctions or Vaishnava ethics. Indeed, it will likely be seen as hypocritical by other Vedic schools of thought, to give so much regard to non- Vedic prophets who do not follow scriptural regulations, as compared to respectable gurus in other sampradaayas like Shankara, etc. The best thing, as always, is to refrain from reinterpreting anyone else's religion and simply preach Krishna-consciousness as it is. If members of other religions like what they hear, then they can reexamine/reinterpret their own scriptures as they choose. It's not our responsibility to justify things according to non-Vedic scriptures. regards, - K _______________ MSN Hotmail è il provider email più grande al mondo… cosa aspetti a farti un account? http://www.hotmail.it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.