Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Doubtful sources

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, krishna_susarla <krishna_susarla wrote:

> I have definitely been told by devotees doing research that "not

> all that glitters is gold." Specifically, I have been informed of

> many works circulating in Vraj that are attributed by some to a

> respectable Gaudiiya aachaarya, but express conclusions that are

> clearly unacceptable, such as maayaavaada.

 

On the other hand, sometimes such dubious authors are deliberately

identified as Gaudiyas, etc., just to give them credibility; I can name

several works of this sort too.

 

 

 

 

> I'm still not sure what to think of SLJ - I never saw a copy of this

> published by the Gaudiya Math.

 

Jagat said he doesn't have any bibliodata after all.

 

 

 

 

(Madhava said)

> > Yes, I was in ISKCON once. My back-then guru became degraded in his

> practice of bhakti and I left him.

> One wonders if Bhaktivinod Thaakura had similar reasons for taking

> shelter of Jagannaatha daasa baabaajii. It has been my observation

> that disciples of degraded gurus do speak highly of the gurus, until

> they finally decide that enough is enough, and move on.

 

Prahlada maharaja even respected Sanda and Amarka.

 

MDd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...