Guest guest Posted August 30, 2005 Report Share Posted August 30, 2005 In yesterda's post tiltled Food and Cancer, we saw how chemical residues in food are propogating diseases such as cancer. The major attack of chemicals on human beings results in loss of fertility or intelligence/immune disfunction. Increase in assisted reproduction (ART), perimenopause related problems can be attributed to cheical induced CNS dysfunction. The reducing quantities of active ingredients in ayurvedic herbs has also been an area of concern to this author. Though old Vaidyas used to prepare medicines suited to each individual, the lack of availability of herb parts rich in active ingredient forces Vaidyas to depend on pharmacies supplying extracts or concentrates. And government is considering encouraging ayurvedic farming on similar principles as food farming. Unless this is done properly, we may be loosing original herbs, in the same manner as original seeds are no more available in case of food grains. In old days, Vaidyas used to bring the herbs from forests themselves, with the special knowledge they had on which part and in what condition to take. Some Vaidyas used to have medicinal plants in their court yard. And almost every Hindu in India keeps Tulsi in his house. Those suffering from bad breath can try five to eleven green Tulsi leaves chewing after every food, and no medication will ever be needed. Thus to gain health, some farming principles, science of how herbs obtain their medicnal qualities by absorbing fundamental elements (earth, water, fire, air) from environment is necessary. Once we learn how herbs obtain their qualities from environment, learning ayurveda becomes just one step further. Ayurvvijnan or what western scientists term Biodynamics is the science of life forces, a recognition of the basic principles at work in nature. Bio means "life" and dynamics refers to "energy". Hence Biodynamic agriculture suggests working with the energies which create and maintain life. There is not a single place on this planet, apart from a few very remote areas which have not been contaminated with chemical pesticides, or even with fertilisers. This has come about only in the last fifty years. Most of the fertilisers - especially the urea fertilisers - were developed during War time as explosives. Since that time, they have been used extensively in agriculture. In fact, the whole agriculture of this century has drawn upon natural reserves of humus and soil, which have been accumulated by Nature through many decades of natural vegetation growths. Having produced those chemicals, and we know very little about their consequent effects on the environment. Chemical fertilisers are very soluble salts, which change the nature of the soil, waters, and substantially alter the ecology of the plants. Using chemical fertilisers is similar to a non-nutritious human diet. Can plant nutrition be reduced to only a couple of minerals? The approach is similar to our popping vitamin pills and supplements. Fertiliser-based methods that reduce plant nutrition to a set of minerals imply that one can disconnect the health of a plant from its surrounding ecology, including insect pests. This approach is one that treats illnesses according to symptoms and not the cause. In this way it is similar to the modern allopathic method of treatment. Many modern medicines are based on symptomatic treatment. The same mode of thinking has been applied in agriculture: there is a pest and the pest has to be killed, no matter what happens around it. It is not realised, that often the pest has its origin in the malnutrition of the soil. Improving the quality of the soil leads to stronger, healthier plants which in turn are more disease and pest resistant. This fact suggests that if plants were healthier, pesticides would not be necessary. This philosophy is similar to the one applied by Dr Reams to Humna health In agriculture, a bad soil yields unhealthy vegetables, which are prone to parasites, to rot, fungi, etc. Inside a human body, the same applies. When the soil, i.e. the blood, the mineral and vitamin status is bad, the blood and tissue become a place where the protits (Enderlein) can't live anymore. They transform into pathogenic microbes (viri, bacteria, molds, fungi, yeasts) and start to destroy the host. At the same time, they try to create the perfect habitat by excreting acids that make the soil even worse, so these microbes can thrive inside the body. Modern medicine assumes that these diseases as caused by invasive microbes or because of an overactive immune system or a defective immune system. Energy medicine tries to kill the pathogenic materializations of the protits, but it doesn't change the soil. Alternative medicine like homeopathy tries to relieve the symptoms using interesting techniques. Low-carb approaches are also quite nice, as it strarves the microbes and boosts immunity. Alas, it's all not enough and it doesn't tackle the real problem: The soil is still a perfect habitat for the pathogenic microbes. The only real cure of any disease can be found when we start to focus on the soil. More info on this theory can be obtained at: http://www.newtreatments.org/reams The earth is a living body. Whatever we do at this part of the planet has consequences at another. Even the people living in the Arctic have been tested positive for traces of chlorides and DDT in their bodies, although there is no farming in those remote regions of the planet. Why? Somebody in Africa is spraying DDT on his cotton crops. The rains wash the pesticidine into the river which in turn carries it into the ocean. Oceans are the circulation body of the earth; all their currents reach to every corner of the globe including the poles ... and the circle continues. We need to change the way of farming, not only of medicinal plants but also of our food, fruits and grains. Ayurvijnan recognises that soil itself can be alive. In Hindu philosophy, earth is called mother. If we enrich the soil with life-sustaining properties the plants will carry those life forces. That, in turn, will give us life as well. Therefore, one of Ayurvijnan fundamental efforts is to build up stable humus in our soil through composting. After using chemical fertilisers for nearly 40 years, in India, more than 1000 farmers are now cultivating cotton in new way. Along with cotton they cultivate a whole range of crops, such as wheat, maize, peas, soya beans, bananas and sugar-cane. In South India, these agricultural principles are used in an area of about 7000 acres. Also tea is cultivated organically. Likewise, these methods are in use in some of the Darjeeling tea gardens. Origin of Ayurvijnan Agriculture Though Indian agriculture used these methods for millennium, this ecological agricultural system was researched in the 1920s in Europe and Australiya. It draws extensively on traditional agricultural knowledge and wisdom which was present in the traditional farming communities. Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925), an Austrian philosopher, scientist, artist, educator, and the founder of antroposophy, developed this agricultural system and gave the name Biodynamics. Biodynamic cultivation has developed into a world-wide movement since 1922. The products from this type of agriculture are marketed in Europe, the United States, Australia or New Zealand. Informed consumers in the industrialised countries have now realised the importance of organic and biodynamic food, and are willing to pay a premium price for food that is 100% free from any pesticides. Quality or Quantity The main aim of natural cultivation is to improve the quality of either food, fiber or medicinal plants. Of course, it also aims at improving the yields but, most importantly, it concentrates on quality. In this century, more and more chemical fertilisers and genetically modified seeds have been developed to produce maximum yields. The main objective has been to increase the yields. The reason is simple: bigger yields bring more money. Most vegetable producers have been cheating the consumer by selling them water for the price of vegetables. For example, dried carrots which have been chemically fertilised show less weight than organic carrots. Adding fertilisers, which are salts, to plants, means that the plants draw more water from the soil in order to balance the ratio of fiber to salt inside. Consequently, as the plant cells expand and swell with water, the ratio of proteins and even vitamins decreases, and the essential oils, which have important medicinal properties, deteriorate. It has been scientifically proven that the amount of vitamins is less in chemically fertilised products. There is an imbalance of vitamins because the fertilised plants draw only one kind of nutrient and not all the trace elements. Hence, it does not produce the entire range of vitamins, and its whole value changes. Quality of Medicinal Plants What we want to achieve in natural farming of medicinal plants, is the cultivation of the inherent quality of the plant. That is the very subtle active principle, which the plant has in very minute quantities. Instead of substance, here we are dealing with essential oils, which are almost not substantial, sometimes present only in parts per million. What is quality, and how can we provide quality in food or in medicinal plants? What are the indicators for quality in medicinal plants? Quality comprises certain active principles, such as taste, juice, colour, seed content in the fruits, nutritional value, the vitamin and protein content. The question is, do we know how to evaluate subtle medicinal properties? How do we define the taste, the aroma, the smell of flowers? How do we increase the scent of a rose, and how do we make oranges more sweet? How do we increase the content of active principles in medicinal plants? Does science know how to produce the best quality of food? Author question whether we know, for example, how to produce maize with the best content of protein or vitamins. The answer is perhaps no. Modern agricultural sciences are based on how to work with yields. We know how to produce quantity but we don't know how to produce quality. We are facing the tragedy that roses don't have any smell any more; oranges have lost their taste; tomatoes are not sweet any more; carrots are bitter, and cultivated medicinal plants have less active principles. Characteristics of the Himalayan Flora and Fauna Each plant develops in a particular ecological zone. Here in the Darjeeling Hills we meet with this fantastic possibility of having land from very low elevations up to very high summits. Additionally the climate provides a lot of warmth and moisture. This combination of moisture and warmth creates very specific kinds of chemicals in the plants. In high altitude mountains the principles are mainly dry and cold, with a lot of light. In contrast, the valleys are full of moisture, heat with a lot of vegetation and rather dark forests. Those extremes produce substances that are very different from each other. In the higher regions of the Himalayas plants grow on very dry soils. These, in many cases, are sandy and not very fertile. The cold climate limits the plants' growth. On lower elevations, the plants produces a lot of leaf, and in higher altitude they prominent with the flowers. The post will be continued tomorrow. Dr Bhate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.