Allergies and conventional/alternative medicine

[Guest guest]

Do you really know what allergy is? IT IS THE FIRST INDICATION THAT THE IMMUNE

SYSTEM IS BREAKING DOWN. Has it ever occurred to you that;

 

1. Allergic reactions have become extremely common since allopathy has been

vociferously pursued in India.

 

2. People are now becoming allergic to even nourishing things like milk and

curd? (This is a symptom of deep seated "psora" according to Hahnemann. Adverse

reaction to nourishing food is also a tubercular symptom)

 

3. A person who suffers from one kind of allergy increasingly becomes allergic

to many other substances after "treatment"!

 

So you see allergy is not a very minor thing as many suggest. And moreover

when mainstream practitioners cannot explain a certain set of symptoms they fall

back on two standard answers;

 

1. The patient has a "psychological problem". (Patients have been complaining

of fatigue since the last three decades, it is only last year that medical

community acknowledged that it was a disease. They said "chronic fatigue

syndrome" has a physical basis. Similiarly for fibromyalgia.)

 

2. The condition is an "allergy".

 

It is a fact that mainstream practitioners recognise only 34% of what the

patients offer as symptoms. They ascribe the remaining 66% to be "figments of

imagination". However all 100% are symptoms of dis-ease. It is only that 34%

have manifested physically and 66% are still at the mental/emotional level and

will become physical symptoms if neglected. PHYSICAL SYMPTOM IS THE LAST STAGE

OF DISEASE.

 

It is easy to shout at the ayurveds. They have suffered so much negligence in

the last two centuries that they have no recourse but to suffer silently. Today,

all over the world, it is the patients who have suffered under allopathy that

have taken up the cudgels. Is this not a very clear sign that something is

horribly wrong with the science?

 

People say I am misleading others. Now, pray, what has modern medicine been

doing all these years? Had they not blatantly mislead the public on basic health

theories today we would not have an epidemic of chronic diseases.

 

I have already posted on how the "virus" theory itself is faulty. Antoine

Beauchamp, MD, and a very renowned practitioner at the time of Louis Pasteur,

who was a mere laboratory assistant, had brought out a thesis condemning the

virus theory. This book continues to be published despite attempts to bury it

showing that even mainstream doctors have their apprehensions about the theory.

Even Pasteur made a dying declaration that, "germs cannot exist without a

terrain".

 

The immune system theory or even better, the swasthya theory of ayurveds,

should have been pursued. The swasthya theory goes one up on the immune theory

because the immune system comes into play AFTER the body has been attacked. The

swasthya or "established in ones self" theory is actually the "health &

wellness" or "symptom free" theory that is now gaining ground.

 

Ayurveda is way ahead of even recent findings. Instead of blindly opposing it

people should study it and find out what is "swasthya".

 

Regards,

Jagannath.