Whistleblower researcher cries foul on AIDS and AZT therapy.

[Guest guest]

UNTOLD PITFALLS IN ALLOPATHY

by Beldeu Singh

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/01/14/decline_of_allopathic_medicine_w\

ill_cellular_health_ayurveda_form_new_paradigm.htm

(A Health Supreme Newsletter)

www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp

 

(excerpts below)

 

I refer to the recent letters in NST (New Straits Times) especially by GSL who

cites a WHO warning on alternative medicine. Well, first of all, we welcome all

warnings on consumables and that includes prescriptions. We cannot, but agree on

the sacrosanct belief in safety, making informed decisions and support the use

of medicines that promote no harm in the human body.

 

Then, it becomes but an equally sacrosanct imperative to state that many drugs

prescribed under allopathy are not a part of the normal metabolic pathways in

human cells and are not part of the healthy or optimal cellular function. Most

of them can, in fact interfere with these metabolic pathways. This is a

fundamental conflict that the allopathic fraternity does not talk about.

 

Most of the allopathic drugs are toxic or cytotoxic and generate free radicals

in the body. As a result many of them have the so called side effects and can

lead to complications arising from oxidative stress. Consequently, you hear of

the benefit-risk profile of allopathic drugs but nobody warns you of their

toxicity. In fact, it has become a part of our mindset in which we readily refer

to them as medicines and not drugs with a benefit-risk profile or drugs with

free radical generating capacity.

:

:AIDS and AZT

One of the drugs used in allopathy is AZT. AZT is highly toxic and it was

officially classified as a poison. AZT therapy was officially indicated only for

"AIDS" or "ARC" patients who either had "a history of cytologically confirmed

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) or an absolute CD4 (T4 helper/inducer)

lymphocyte count of less than 200/mm3 in the peripheral blood before therapy is

begun." (Physician's Desk Reference). This changed with claims that AZT was

beneficial for "HIV-infected" persons with "mild symptoms of immune system

damage" and also for "HIV- infected persons who have not yet developed

symptoms." Where are the clinical trials in large groups of people (double blind

and placebo) to prove that AZT is beneficial to "infected" people who have not

yet developed the symptoms. AZT is a poison that will invariably cause a host of

delapidating complications at the cellular and organ level within 18 months,

even when taken in the prescribed doses on a daily basis and lead

to death. Again, the basic science of poisons is not in agreement with the use

of AZT in people who have not developed the symtoms. Take a look at a 15 year

old label of AZT and decide for yourself if you can call it a medicine.

 

"Phial of 25 mg AZT supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH for use in research

laboratories, with the label bearing an orange stripe imprinted with a skull and

crossbones icon to signify potentially fatal toxic chemical hazard to the

handler - spelt out in six languages: Toxic Giftig Toxique Toxico Tossico

Vergiftig - and the warning: TOXIC

Toxic to inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed. Target organ(s):

Blood, Bone marrow. In case of accident or if you feel unwell, seek medical

advice immediately (show the label where possible). Wear suitable protective

clothing." (The latest label also contains a cancer warning.)

 

Allopathic doctors prescribe this poison as a retroviral. Where is the proof

gathered from laboratory tests or clinical trials or fundamental science to show

that AZT is a retroviral? The original data showed that it is highly cytotoxic.

How on earth can any substance that was once labelled as "TOXIC TO INHALATION"

become a prescription drug? Why is this never told to the patient? Perhaps, we

need to review our laws so that allopathic doctors give mandatory information on

the risks of the drugs they use.

 

I, too take pride in such studies as they are scientifically important and in

the case of allopathic drugs that are toxic, these are of critical importance.

In fact, I have even proposed an additional test (called the Leaf Test, named

after Dr. Alexander Leaf of Harvard) to test all drugs for toxicity on neonatal

heart cells to determine how many will initiate arrythimias as a guideline for

their safety and how much antioxidants are required to reverse it.

 

I like many others have derived benefit from allopathic practice and these

tests are simply a must especially for all those drugs that are not part of the

normal metabolic pathways if healthy tissues.

 

There remains a question for our allopathic fraternity to explain why AZT is

prescribed after antibodies are detected whereas the laws of immunization tell

us that once you develop the antibody, you get acquired immunity and you are on

the way to recovery. Why is this postulate in vaccination abondoned when a

person is tested "HIV-positive" and put on toxic drugs?

 

Dr, Gallo said that he had an isolate of the HIV-virus which of course was not

made according to the Koch postulates or the established gold standard and he

said the virus is "the probable" cause of AIDS. Where is the scientific proof

that there exists a virus that specifically targets the cells of the immune

system and destroys these cells?

:

:

:

It is worthy to note that those in positions and call for large scale testing

and clinical trial and serious research actually only state the lack of it as a

ground for not accepting it but do nothing to promote such research.

 

Research is the key for generating data and information that becomes part of

usable knowledge in the interest of humanity and health. Specialist knowledge

when confined to its cell is useless in development and progress. The use of

one's position in the establishment to deny the good or a potential good in

other fields is a curse. And to carry one's mindset as the singular truth with

the aim of projecting it as the only consumable reality is an abomination that

lacks scientific temper.

 

I invite the allopathic fraternity, led by the Health Minister, (Malayasia),

and Dr Ismail Merican to an open debate on allopathic toxicity and the pitfalls

of drug therapy as a measure to create public awareness. There is little value

in carrying on a debate through letters in the NST. I do not claim to know

everything for the most incorrigible vice is that of an ignorance that fancies

it knows everything. I am nothing more than a researcher looking for some

practical truth that may benefit mankind.

 

BELDEU SINGH

SELAYANG