Whose karma is whos???

[Guest guest]

Dear Soul,

 

Please understand the reality of "Karma". It is action-reaction. It is

impossible to GIVE or

take bad or good karma from anyone. We all, each soul in a body, from an atom up

to

Brahma, we ALL have our own karma. If I get a sacred object, and my karma

improves,

THAT is also my karma. We can only do as good or bad as our KARMA.

 

If it states in Shastra that donating gems is good karma for the giver then who

will say

that receiving a gem is not good luck? What sane man would reject a gemstone

gift? So by

gem donations, for Rahu, we donate a hessonite gem to a leper. And who will say

that's

not a lucky leper to get a flawless gem (jyotish quality MUST be used)? if

people are GIVING

away fine gems who is so foolish as to refuse one?

 

"Kind leper, here is a flawless hessonite gem, please accept!" <--- so what's

the harm?

 

Bottom line is that we all lose and gain exactly according to our karma. Even

changing

karma requires "Karma". So we cannot "give" OUR bad karma to another. The gem

for our

bad planet, to be donated, is not "bad luck" it is just a gem for that planet.

If it's jyotish

quality then it is always blessed.

 

YET, one common sense example is like this: A politician wants to harness Sun to

get

famous, so Shastra says for Sun must donate a fine ruby to a male government

leader. So

when searching for the recepient the giver can have their horoscope cast to see

who is the

BEST to receive the ruby from among goverment leaders... and what goverment

leader will

refuse a fine ruby that's good for their horoscope? On the other extreme a leper

doesn't

even know their birthdate

 

So giving and receiving, done correctly, is good for society.

 

Best rgds,

Richard

 

sacred-objects, "Richard Shaw-Brown II" <rsbj66>

wrote:

>

> Hi Diva,

>

> Namaste!!! A defective planetary position in Jyotish astrology is a planet in

an enemy

sign

> located in a bad house or enemy of the lord of the Rising Sign, etc. Please

send me your

> birth date, time & place and I'll tell you if there is any serious problem in

your Sidereal

> chart.

>

> Best,

> Richard

>

> PS: I'll post a picture of the "Queen Sirikit Navaratna" tonight on the

Sacred-objects

Home

> Page. A notice will be sent.

>

> sacred-objects, "divadevi108" <divadevi108> wrote:

> >

> > sacred-objects, "Richard Shaw-Brown II"

> > <rsbj66> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Diva Devi,

> > >

> > > The Navaratna is best used by Royalty or by someone with no

> > serious chart defects.

> >

> > dear richard: thank you very much for your response. what is

> > considered to be a chart defect? my knowledge of hindu astrology is

> > limited to the notion that everything moves back a sign from western

> > astrology. i know of some aspects in my chart but don't know what is

> > considered a chart defect.

> >

> > the navratna mala i wear was purchased in rishikesh and is composed

> > of faceted gemstones, graduated in size, with the exception of the

> > cat's eye, pearl and coral. the stones are not large. they're

> > rather delicate actually, but have lovely color and clarity. it has

> > a very light, magical energy.

> >

> > i also wear an akarshaya siddh mala, with 2 through 14 mukhi beads.

> > does this meet the need for the 10-mukhi bead you mentioned, or are

> > you speaking of wearing a single 10-mukhi by itself? do you mind

> > sharing how you decided on your personal combination to wear of

> > the 2, 4, 13 and 14 mukhi mala?

> >

> > it would be wonderful to see a picture of the navratna mala you made

> > for the queen of thailand. i couldn't follow the link you posted

> > here for your navratna pieces so will go to your website and check

> > there.

> >

> > namaste,

> >

> > diva devi

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > But

> > > more importantly it MUST contain flawless gems, including Natural

> > Pearl. There is no

> > > minimum size because QUALITY is ALL IMPORTANT. If you use all fine

> > gems – in 2 carat

> > > sizes it will cost a small fortune. We made one for HM The Queen

> > of Thailand using all one

> > > carat gems and it was very costly. Most of our Navaratna use fine

> > gems in the 4-5mm size

> > > range with larger ruby or red spinel in the center.

> > >

> > > The Rudraksha is more powerful talisman than gems, and the one

> > Rudraksha most

> > > suitable to pacify all the 9 planets is the Dos-mukhi (10 faced)

> > from Nepal.

> > >

> > > For our Navaratna designs:

> > > http://

> > >

> > www.agtgems.comcatalogadvanced_search_result.phpkeywords=Navaratna&os

> > Csid=7c9d

> > > b8325e51b0dfec8c036dccdf6a6f&x=7&y=7

> > >

> > > If a chart has troubled planetary positions then the best choice

> > is to wear a single gem for

> > > the most favourable planet. Donating gems for troubled planets is

> > the best remedy. If you

> > > need "Ratna-arpana" (gem donation) info please write again.

> > >

> > > Best regards,

> > > Richard

> > >

> > > Richard Shaw-Brown, PG

> > > http://www.richardshawbrown.com

> > >

> > > sacred-objects, "divadevi108"

> > <divadevi108> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > dear richard: i have been reading the posts on "sacred objects"

> > > > with great interest and have a question to ask, if i may. for

> > many

> > > > years i have studied and enjoyed the energies of gemstones and

> > > > rudrakshas and thought that wearing a navratna mala of good

> > quality

> > > > was a positive thing to do. since reading about the negative

> > > > effects of emerald, for instance, for certain signs or planetary

> > > > influences, i'm wondering if rudraksha would override this

> > possible

> > > > negative effect from the emerald in a navratna mala. in western

> > > > astrology i'm 0 degrees aries rising, scorpio sun, so have the

> > mars

> > > > influence which may contraindicate wearing emerald. my

> > birthdate is

> > > > november 8, 1945.

> > > >

> > > > i have tried wearing only my sphatika and rudraksha malas and

> > feel

> > > > quite naked without the navratna but do not wish to be engaging

> > in

> > > > astrologically foolish behaviour.

> > > >

> > > > thank you for providing such a wonderful site. your pieces are

> > > > exquisite!

> > > >

> > > > diva devi

> > > >

> > >

> >

>